Literature DB >> 32894010

Preoperative MRI for predicting pathological changes associated with surgical difficulty during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

K Omiya1, K Hiramatsu1, T Kato1, Y Shibata1, M Yoshihara1, T Aoba1, A Arimoto1, A Ito1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severe inflammation with necrosis and fibrosis of the gallbladder in acute cholecystitis increases operative difficulty during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study aimed to assess the use of preoperative MRI in predicting pathological changes of the gallbladder associated with surgical difficulty.
METHODS: Patients who underwent both preoperative MRI and early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis between 2012 and 2018 were identified retrospectively. On the basis of the layered pattern of the gallbladder wall on MRI, patients were classified into three groups: high signal intensity (HSI), intermediate signal intensity (ISI), and low signal intensity (LSI). The endpoint was the presence of pathological changes of the gallbladder associated with surgical difficulty, such as necrosis, abscess formation and fibrosis.
RESULTS: Of 229 eligible patients, pathological changes associated with surgical difficulty were found in 17 (27 per cent) of 62 patients in the HSI group, 84 (85 per cent) of 99 patients in the ISI group, and 66 (97 per cent) of 68 patients in the LSI group (P < 0·001). For detecting these changes, intermediate to low signal intensity of the gallbladder wall had a sensitivity of 90 (95 per cent c.i. 84 to 94) per cent, specificity of 73 (60 to 83) per cent and accuracy of 85 (80 to 90) per cent.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative MRI predicted pathological changes associated with surgical difficulty during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.
© 2020 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Journal of Surgery Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32894010      PMCID: PMC7709376          DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJS Open        ISSN: 2474-9842


Introduction

Surgical difficulty during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) differs, depending on the degree of inflammation and fibrosis of the gallbladder . Severe local inflammation and fibrosis of the gallbladder wall increase both operative difficulty and frequency of intraoperative complications during LC , . The Tokyo Guidelines from 2018 proposed that intraoperative findings such as necrosis, abscess formation and fibrosis of the gallbladder are considered to be novel, objective and direct indicators for measuring surgical difficulty in LC for AC. Indicators such as open conversion rate and duration of surgery are not considered appropriate because they depend substantially on surgeons' skills and experiences , . However, in clinical practice, preoperative predictions of these pathological changes in the gallbladder wall are also crucial in deciding a treatment strategy to reduce severe complications. These histopathological changes of the gallbladder wall in AC develop with time within the following stages: first stage, oedematous cholecystitis (2–4 days); second stage, necrotizing cholecystitis (3–5 days); third stage, suppurative cholecystitis (7–10 days); and fourth stage, chronic cholecystitis (repeated occurrence of cholecystitis) . The second and third stages comprise gangrenous changes, and the third and fourth stages comprise fibrosis of the gallbladder wall . However, it is difficult to determine precisely the time that has passed since disease onset . In addition, some cases of AC occur as a result of exacerbations of chronic cholecystitis . Therefore, it is difficult to predict the pathological condition of the gallbladder in AC, and surgeons often discover unpredictable severe necrosis and fibrosis of the gallbladder wall during early surgery, sometimes even within 48 h of disease onset. Although many studies have tried to identify indicators of surgical difficulty in LC, only a few have focused on preoperative assessment to predict pathological changes of the gallbladder wall associated with increased surgical difficulty. Some studies have reported that the gallbladder wall showed various signal intensities and layered patterns on MRI; the MRI findings correlated well with the pathological findings and were useful for diagnosis of gallbladder disease, such as AC, gangrenous cholecystitis, chronic cholecystitis and gallbladder carcinoma , , , . The present authors have assumed that layered patterns of the gallbladder wall in AC before surgery are also associated with pathological changes associated with surgical difficulty, such as necrosis, abscess formation and fibrosis. This study aimed to assess the usefulness of preoperative non‐contrast‐enhanced MRI to predict the pathological changes of the gallbladder wall associated with increased surgical difficulty during early cholecystectomy for AC.

Methods

An institutional surgery database was searched to identify patients who had undergone cholecystectomy at Toyohashi Municipal Hospital in Japan from January 2012 to December 2018. Patient information was collected retrospectively from the electronic medical records. Eligibility criteria were: patients with AC diagnosed clinically according to the Tokyo Guidelines of 2007 , 2013 and 2018 , who underwent cholecystectomy 7 days or less after disease onset (early cholecystectomy), and had MRI and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) 24 h or less before surgery. Exclusion criteria were: gallbladder wall thickness less than 3 mm on MRI, and clinical suspicion of gallbladder cancer. The ethics committee of Toyohashi Municipal Hospital approved the study protocol.

MRI and MRCP procedure

Non‐contrast‐enhanced MRI and MRCP on a 3‐T superconducting instrument (MAGNETOM Skyra; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) were performed routinely to assess the presence of common bile duct stones and abnormal anatomical variations in the bile duct before surgery. After initial T1‐weighted images, HASTE (Half‐Fourier‐Acquired Single‐shot Turbo spin Echo) T2‐weighted images sequence were applied in the axial, coronal, and oblique sagittal planes. The oblique sagittal plane was applied parallel to the course of the common bile duct, as demonstrated on initial coronal scout views. Images were acquired in each imaging plane. MRCP was performed using a HASTE sequence. The following parameters were used: prospective acquisition correction technique; repetition time, ∞; echo time, 86 ms; thickness, 3 mm; gap, 0 mm; flip angle, 130°; matrix size, 256 × 256; phase partial Fourier 4/8; field of view, 300 × 300 mm; and fat saturation (spectral‐attenuated inversion recovery). Data from the MRCP and original HASTE MRI of each patient were routinely stored in the electronic medical records.

Interpretation of MRI

The previously obtained preoperative MRI and MRCP data for all patients were assessed retrospectively and independently by two surgeons blinded to the clinical information and type of surgery but aware of the presence of cholecystitis. HASTE T2‐weighted images captured during MRCP were assessed, and gallbladder wall thickness was measured from the section showing the thickest part of the wall. The layered pattern of the thickened wall was classified into three groups: a high signal intensity (HSI) group (two layers with a discrete margin composed of a thin inner layer (3 mm or less) with low signal and a relatively thick outer layer with high signal); an intermediate signal intensity (ISI) group (two layers with a partially ill‐defined margin composed of a partially thickened inner layer (more than 3 mm) with low signal and an outer layer with high or partially heterogeneous intermediate signal); and a low signal intensity (LSI) group (ill‐defined layers composed of a diffusely thickened inner layer (more than 3 mm) with low signal and an outer layer with intermediate to low signal). Examples of images from the three groups are shown in Fig.  . Signal intensities were determined by using standardized regions of interest (ROI). The ROI size was similar for all measurements and patients, and varied between 0·03 and 0·06 cm2. LSI lesions of the gallbladder wall were judged in comparison with the signal intensity of the renal parenchyma.
Fig. 1

Layered pattern of the gallbladder wall

Layered pattern of the gallbladder wall

Histopathological examination

Details of histopathological findings in the surgical specimens of each patient were obtained from the pathology reports. These reports were made within 2 weeks of surgery by a staff pathologist who was aware of the presence of cholecystitis and type of surgery but was not informed about the radiological findings.

Endpoint

The endpoint of this study was the presence of pathological changes predictive of surgical difficulty, such as necrosis, abscess formation or fibrosis. On the basis of the results of the three groups, the appropriate cut‐off point for MRI findings of the gallbladder wall was determined for predicting pathological changes associated with surgical difficulty. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR−) were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the use of preoperative MRI findings for predicting the pathological condition of the gallbladder wall in patients with AC who had undergone surgery within 48 h of disease onset.

Statistical analysis

Median (range) values are presented. Fisher's exact test was used to test differences between categorical variables, and the Mann‐Whitney U test and the Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test for differences between continuous variables. All P values were two‐sided, and associations were considered significant at P < 0·050. If there was a significant difference among the three groups, pairwise comparisons for all groups were performed, with P values adjusted by the Holm method. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.5.2 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and EZR (Saitama Medical Centre, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), which is a graphical user interface for R.

Results

Data were collected for 651 patients who had underwent cholecystectomy after diagnosis of AC. Of these patients, 258 had undergone early cholecystectomy and 393 had had delayed cholecystectomy. Some 231 of the patients who underwent early cholecystectomy had MRI and MRCP within 24 h of surgery. Two patients were excluded owing to gallbladder wall thickness of less than 3 mm on MRI. Ultimately, 62, 99 and 68 patients respectively were selected for the HSI, ISI and LSI groups (Fig.  ).
Fig. 2

Flow diagram of patient selection

Flow diagram of patient selection Table  shows baseline patient characteristics, preoperative findings and type of operation. Baseline characteristics were similar among the three groups. Gallbladder wall thickness measured on MRI was significantly greater in the ISI and LSI groups than in the HSI group (HSI versus ISI, P < 0·001; ISI versus LSI, P = 0·277; LSI versus HSI, P < 0·001). Preoperative C‐reactive protein (CRP) level was significantly higher in decreasing order of LSI, ISI and HSI in pairwise comparisons (HSI versus ISI, P < 0·001; ISI versus LSI, P < 0·001; LSI versus HSI, P < 0·001). The rate of planned open cholecystectomy was significantly higher in decreasing order of LSI, ISI and HSI (HSI versus ISI, P = 0·022; ISI versus LSI, P = 0·022; LSI versus HSI, P < 0·001).
Table 1

Characteristics of the three groups

HSI group (n = 62)ISI group (n = 99)LSI group (n = 68) P
Baseline characteristics
Age (years)* 59 (46–68)65 (51–73)67 (57–75)0·068§
Sex ratio (M : F)36 : 2667 : 3245 : 230·439
BMI (kg/m2)* 25·0 (21·3–28·1)24·3 (21·8–27·4)24·8 (22·4–27·1)0·878§
ASA physical status0·037
I28 (45)34 (34)21 (31)
II34 (55)59 (60)39 (57)
III0 (0)6 (6)8 (12)
Diabetes mellitus11 (18)14 (14)15 (22)0·418
Previous diagnosis of gallstones17 (27)34 (34)22 (32)0·793
Past gallbladder attack13 (21)17 (17)14 (21)0·790
Past acute cholecystitis3 (5)7 (7)7 (10)0·530
Preoperative findings
Body temperature (°C)* 36·7 (36·3–37·2)37·0 (36·6–37·5)37·0 (36·6–37·6)0·029§
Preoperative gallbladder drainage0 (0)2 (2)1 (1)0·789
Thickness of gallbladder wall on MRI (mm)* 5 (4–7)7 (6–8)7 (6–9)< 0·001§
Gallstones recognized on MRI53 (85)83 (84)53 (78)0·117
WBC (cells/μl)* 10 135 (8445–13 960)10 670 (8835–14 615)12 715 (9470–15 512)0·054§
CRP (mg/dl)* 0·31 (0·08–1·05)0·60 (0·14–5·99)6·51 (1·18–15·14)< 0·001§
AST (units/l)* 24 (19–37)24 (18–33)24 (19–34)0·721§
ALT (units/l)* 26 (18–39)23 (17–41)25 (16–52)0·519§
ALP (units/l)* 213 (163–283)223 (184–289)221 (183–282)0·442§
Total bilirubin (mg/dl)* 0·7 (0·5–1·0)1·0 (0·7–1·6)1·0 (0·7–1·5)< 0·001§
Severity grade 0·037
I60 (97)86 (87)57 (84)
II2 (3)13 (13)11 (16)
Surgical details
Type of surgery< 0·001
Laparoscopic60 (97)81 (82)42 (62)
Open conversion0 (0)8 (8)14 (21)
Open2 (3)10 (10)12 (18)
Time from disease onset to surgery (h)0·114
≤ 4855 (89)78 (79)51 (75)
> 487 (11)21 (21)17 (25)

Values in parentheses are percentages unless indicated otherwise;

values are median (range).

Assessed according to Tokyo Guidelines of 2007, 2013 and 2018. HSI, high signal intensity; ISI, intermediate signal intensity; LSI, low signal intensity; WBC, white blood cell; CRP, C‐reactive protein; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase.

Fisher's exact test, except

Kruskal–Wallis test.

Characteristics of the three groups Values in parentheses are percentages unless indicated otherwise; values are median (range). Assessed according to Tokyo Guidelines of 2007, 2013 and 2018. HSI, high signal intensity; ISI, intermediate signal intensity; LSI, low signal intensity; WBC, white blood cell; CRP, C‐reactive protein; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase. Fisher's exact test, except Kruskal–Wallis test.

Outcomes

Pathological gallbladder changes associated with surgical difficulty were identified in 27 per cent of patients in the HSI group, 85 per cent of patients in the ISI group, and 97 per cent of those in the LSI group (P < 0·001) (Table  ). In the pairwise comparisons, the proportion of patients with any pathological change associated with surgical difficulty was significantly higher in decreasing order of LSI, ISI and HSI (Table  ).
Table 2

Pathological outcomes in the three groups

HSI group (n = 62)ISI group (n = 99)LSI group (n = 68) P *
Pathological change associated with surgical difficulty 17 (27)84 (85)66 (97)< 0·001
Details of pathological change
Necrosis9 (15)51 (52)49 (72)< 0·001
Abscess formation2 (3)8 (8)9 (13)0·126
Fibrosis10 (16)50 (51)37 (54)< 0·001

Values in parentheses are percentages. HSI, high signal intensity; ISI, intermediate signal intensity; LSI, low signal intensity.

Fisher's exact test.

In pairwise comparisons: P < 0·001 (HSI versus ISI), P = 0·010 (ISI versus LSI) and P < 0·001 (LSI versus HSI);

in pairwise comparisons: P < 0·001 (HSI versus ISI), P = 0·640 (ISI versus LSI) and P < 0·001 (LSI versus HSI) (Fisher's exact test with adjustment by Holm method).

Pathological outcomes in the three groups Values in parentheses are percentages. HSI, high signal intensity; ISI, intermediate signal intensity; LSI, low signal intensity. Fisher's exact test. In pairwise comparisons: P < 0·001 (HSI versus ISI), P = 0·010 (ISI versus LSI) and P < 0·001 (LSI versus HSI); in pairwise comparisons: P < 0·001 (HSI versus ISI), P = 0·640 (ISI versus LSI) and P < 0·001 (LSI versus HSI) (Fisher's exact test with adjustment by Holm method). With regard to the types of pathological change, necrosis in the gallbladder wall was detected in 15 per cent of patients in the HSI group, 52 per cent of patients in the ISI group, and 72 per cent of those in the LSI group. In the pairwise comparisons, the proportion of patients with necrosis of the gallbladder was significantly higher in decreasing order of LSI, ISI and HSI (Table  ). Fibrosis in the gallbladder wall was detected in 16 per cent of the HSI group, 51 per cent of the ISI group, and 54 per cent of the LSI group. In the pairwise comparisons, the proportion of patients with fibrosis of the gallbladder was significantly higher in the ISI and LSI groups than in the HSI group (Table  ). Abscess formation in the gallbladder wall was found in 3, 8 and 13 per cent of patients in the HSI, ISI and LSI group respectively, but the differences were not significant (Table  ).

Use of MRI to predict gallbladder wall changes associated with surgical difficulty

As the outcomes were relatively similar between ISI and LSI groups, intermediate to low signal intensity in the gallbladder wall was defined as positive and high signal intensity as negative. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, LR+ and LR− of MRI for predicting pathological changes associated with surgical difficulty were 90 (95 per cent c.i. 84 to 94) per cent, 73 (60 to 83) per cent, 85 (80 to 90) per cent, 3·28 (95 per cent c.i. 2·18 to 4·93) and 0·14 (0·09 to 0·23) respectively. Because preoperative CRP concentration was significantly higher in the decreasing order of LSI, ISI and HSI (Tables  and ), an additional analysis was performed for the utility of CRP level in predicting pathological change; this was later compared with MRI scans. The resulting Mann–Whitney U test highlighted a significant difference between preoperative CRP level and pathological changes. However, as with all cut‐off points, the accuracy, LR+ and LR− values of CRP for predicting pathological changes associated with surgical difficulty were inferior to those of MRI.
Table 3

Characteristics of the subgroups of patients undergoing surgery within 48 h of disease onset

HSI group (n = 55)ISI group (n = 78)LSI group (n = 51) P
Baseline characteristics
Age (years)* 60 (49–69)65 (51–71)67 (59–75)0·129§
Sex ratio (M : F)32 : 2353 : 2531 : 200·439
BMI (kg/m2)* 25·0 (21·3–28·1)24·3 (21·8–27·4)24·8 (22·4–27·1)0·484§
ASA physical status0·026
I26 (47)26 (33)17 (33)
II29 (53)48 (62)27 (53)
III0 (0)4 (5)7 (14)
Diabetes mellitus10 (18)11 (14)13 (25)0·262
Previous diagnosis of gallstones14 (25)27 (35)18 (35)0·471
Past gallbladder attack11 (20)14 (18)11 (22)0·891
Past acute cholecystitis2 (4)4 (5)6 (12)0·244
Preoperative findings
Body temperature (°C)* 36·6 (36·2–37·2)36·9 (36·3–37·5)36·9 (36·5–37·7)0·038§
Preoperative gallbladder drainage0 (0)1 (1·3)0 (0)1·000
Thickness of gallbladder wall on MRI (mm)* 5 (4–7)7 (6–8)7 (6–9)< 0·001§
Gallstones recognized on MRI47 (85)67 (86)42 (82)0·869
WBC (cells/μl)* 11 260 (8850–14 140)10 595 (8873–14 060)12 690 (9440–15 835)0·141§
CRP (mg/dl)* 0·25 (0·08–0·85)0·52 (0·12–5·12)3·18 (0·47–11·39)< 0·001§
AST (units/l)* 24 (19–34)25 (18–33)25 (19–42)0·972§
ALT (units/l)* 25 (18–38)23 (17–43)25 (16–54)0·919§
ALP (units/l)* 206 (161–272)222 (182–288)217 (174–285)0·240§
Total bilirubin (mg/dl)* 0·6 (0·2–0·9)1·0 (0·7–1·6)1·0 (0·7–1·5)< 0·001§
Severity grade 0·049
I53 (96)68 (87)42 (82)
II2 (4)10 (13)9 (18)
Type of surgery < 0·001
Laparoscopic55 (100)66 (85)33 (65)
Open conversion0 (0)6 (8)11 (22)
Open0 (0)6 (8)7 (14)

Values in parentheses are percentages unless indicated otherwise;

values are median (range).

Assessed according to Tokyo Guidelines of 2007, 2013 and 2018. HSI, high signal intensity; ISI, intermediate signal intensity; LSI, low signal intensity; WBC, white blood cell; CRP, C‐reactive protein; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase.

Fisher's exact test, except

Kruskal–Wallis test.

Characteristics of the subgroups of patients undergoing surgery within 48 h of disease onset Values in parentheses are percentages unless indicated otherwise; values are median (range). Assessed according to Tokyo Guidelines of 2007, 2013 and 2018. HSI, high signal intensity; ISI, intermediate signal intensity; LSI, low signal intensity; WBC, white blood cell; CRP, C‐reactive protein; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase. Fisher's exact test, except Kruskal–Wallis test.

Subgroup analysis

A total of 184 patients who had surgery within 48 h of disease onset were eligible for subgroup analysis. Pathological changes associated with surgical difficulty, such as necrosis, abscess formation and fibrosis, were detected in 130 (70·7 per cent) of these patients: 55 in the HSI group, 78 in the ISI group and 51 in the LSI group. Subgroup results are shown in Table  . For each group, the proportion of patients with pathological changes associated with surgical difficulty was similar to that in analysis of the whole cohort.
Table 4

Pathological outcomes in the subgroup of patients undergoing surgery within 48 h of disease onset

HSI group (n = 55)ISI group (n = 78)LSI group (n = 51) P *
Pathological change associated with surgical difficulty 14 (25)66 (85)50 (98)< 0·001
Details of pathological change
Necrosis8 (15)36 (46)37 (73)< 0·001
Abscess formation2 (4)5 (6)7 (14)0·149
Fibrosis7 (13)40 (51)26 (51)< 0·001§

Values in parentheses are percentages. HSI, high signal intensity; ISI, intermediate signal intensity; LSI, low signal intensity.

Fisher's exact test.

In pairwise comparisons: P < 0·001 (HSI versus ISI), P = 0·015 (ISI versus LSI) and P < 0·001 (LSI versus HSI);

in pairwise comparisons: P < 0·001 (HSI versus ISI), P = 0·004 (ISI versus LSI) and P < 0·001 (LSI versus HSI);

in pairwise comparison: P < 0·001 (HSI versus ISI), P = 1·000 (ISI versus LSI) and P < 0·001 (LSI versus HSI) (Fisher's exact test with adjustment by Holm method).

Pathological outcomes in the subgroup of patients undergoing surgery within 48 h of disease onset Values in parentheses are percentages. HSI, high signal intensity; ISI, intermediate signal intensity; LSI, low signal intensity. Fisher's exact test. In pairwise comparisons: P < 0·001 (HSI versus ISI), P = 0·015 (ISI versus LSI) and P < 0·001 (LSI versus HSI); in pairwise comparisons: P < 0·001 (HSI versus ISI), P = 0·004 (ISI versus LSI) and P < 0·001 (LSI versus HSI); in pairwise comparison: P < 0·001 (HSI versus ISI), P = 1·000 (ISI versus LSI) and P < 0·001 (LSI versus HSI) (Fisher's exact test with adjustment by Holm method). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, LR+ and LR− of MRI in identifying pathological changes associated with surgical difficulty of gallbladder wall in patients with AC who had surgery within 48 h of disease onset were 89 (95 per cent c.i. 83 to 94) per cent, 76 (62 to 87) per cent, 85 (79 to 90) per cent), 3·71 (95 per cent c.i. 2·30 to 5·98) and 0·14 (0·09 to 0·24) respectively.

Discussion

There were three major findings from this single‐centre retrospective study. First, variations in the layered pattern of the gallbladder wall on non‐contrast‐enhanced MRI classified by the study criteria were significantly associated with fibrosis and necrosis of the gallbladder wall in patients with AC. Second, intermediate to low signal intensity of the gallbladder wall had a sensitivity of 90 per cent and a specificity of 73 per cent for predicting pathological changes in the gallbladder wall associated with surgical difficulty during LC in AC. Third, even in patients who had early cholecystectomy within 48 h of disease onset, 70·7 per cent had pathological changes associated with surgical difficulty, and MRI findings were useful in predicting such changes. These results indicate that MRI is a promising method for predicting surgical difficulty for LC. Many previous studies , , , , , , have reported predictors of surgical difficulty during LC for AC, such as preoperative radiological findings (non‐visualized gallbladder on preoperative cholangiography, cystic duct length, gallbladder wall thickening, incarcerated stones in the gallbladder neck, fluid retention around the gallbladder), duration of raised CRP, white blood cell count, low albumin, high bilirubin, diabetes and male sex. These studies included factors such as open conversion rate and duration of surgery as indicators of surgical difficulty. However, some studies , have indicated that the criteria for open conversion vary among surgeons and that the operating time is highly dependent on the skills and experience of the operator. Based on a Delphi consensus amongst a large number of surgeons of varying nationalities, Iwashita and colleagues , reported that intraoperative findings that have a substantial effect on surgical difficulty during LC, such as necrosis, abscess formation and fibrosis of the gallbladder wall, may be novel indicators of surgical difficulty. The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 recommended the use of these intraoperative findings as objective, direct indicators that are capable of measuring surgical difficulty. As a next step, the present authors focused here on the preoperative prediction of these pathological conditions of the gallbladder wall in patients with AC. MRCP is a non‐invasive technique that has been used previously in the assessment of bile duct abnormality. The HASTE sequence captured for MRCP has already been shown to be a technique for assessing pathology of the gallbladder wall. Jung et al. reported that the thickened gallbladder wall on HASTE MRI had two layers: a low‐signal inner layer and a high‐signal outer layer. Pathologically, the inner layer corresponded to the mucosa and muscular layer, and the outer layer corresponded to serosal oedema. These researchers also reported that, in some cases, thickening of the low‐signal layer with an ill‐defined margin corresponded to sloughed mucosa or haemorrhagic necrosis, and the ISI area of the outer layer corresponded to prominent fibrosis in the muscular layer and serosa. The results of the present study may be radiologically and pathologically compatible. In general, necrosis and fibrosis of the gallbladder wall occur approximately 3 and 7 days, respectively, after the onset of AC . Some studies , , , , assessing the appropriate timing for surgery have reported that early LC within 72 h of disease onset is relatively safe, and the Tokyo Guidelines 2013 previously recommended early cholecystectomy within 72 h of the onset of symptoms . However, in the present study, approximately 70 per cent of patients who had early surgery within 48 h after onset of AC already had either fibrosis, necrosis or abscess formation of the gallbladder wall. This finding might be because, in some cases, AC had begun some days before the patients noticed their symptoms or AC occurred in the mechanism of acute exacerbations of chronic cholecystitis. The present results indicate that MRI findings might also be useful for predicting such clinically unpredictable pathological conditions. Several limitations of the present study should be acknowledged. First, this was a retrospective analysis. As the outcomes were assessed on the basis of the pathological report from a staff pathologist before the study protocol was devised, mild pathological changes might not have been recorded. In addition, the study included only patients who had undergone MRI within 24 h of surgery. Gangrenous change of the gallbladder wall in AC may progress day by day. Although some extension of the time between MRI and surgery might be acceptable, care should be taken when extrapolating the present results to patients under other circumstances. Furthermore, during the 2012–2018 study period, most patients who were diagnosed as having AC more than 72 h from disease onset underwent delayed surgery in the authors' hospital, because the Tokyo Guidelines 2013 recommended early surgery only for patients with disease onset of 72 h or less . Further validation is necessary before patients diagnosed as having AC 72 h after onset can be assessed.
  26 in total

1.  Gallbladder wall thickening: MR imaging and pathologic correlation with emphasis on layered pattern.

Authors:  S E Jung; J M Lee; K Lee; S E Rha; B G Choi; E K Kim; S T Hahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Preoperative Risk Factors for Conversion of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy to Open Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Authors:  Josephine Philip Rothman; Jakob Burcharth; Hans-Christian Pommergaard; Søren Viereck; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 2.588

3.  The "right" way is not always popular: comparison of surgeons' perceptions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis among experts from Japan, Korea and Taiwan.

Authors:  Taizo Hibi; Yukio Iwashita; Tetsuji Ohyama; Goro Honda; Masahiro Yoshida; Tadahiro Takada; Ho-Seong Han; Tsann-Long Hwang; Satoshi Shinya; Kenji Suzuki; Akiko Umezawa; Yoo-Seok Yoon; In-Seok Choi; Wayne Shih-Wei Huang; Kuo-Hsin Chen; Fumihiko Miura; Manabu Watanabe; Yuta Abe; Takeyuki Misawa; Yuichi Nagakawa; Dong-Sup Yoon; Jin-Young Jang; Hee Chul Yu; Keun Soo Ahn; Song Cheol Kim; In Sang Song; Ji Hoon Kim; Sung Su Yun; Seong Ho Choi; Yi-Yin Jan; Shyr-Ming Sheen-Chen; Yan-Shen Shan; Chen-Guo Ker; De-Chuan Chan; Cheng-Chung Wu; Naoyuki Toyota; Ryota Higuchi; Yoshiharu Nakamura; Yoshiaki Mizuguchi; Yutaka Takeda; Masahiro Ito; Shinji Norimizu; Shigetoshi Yamada; Naoki Matsumura; Junichi Shindoh; Hiroki Sunagawa; Takeshi Gocho; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Toshiki Rikiyama; Naohiro Sata; Nobuyasu Kano; Seigo Kitano; Hiromi Tokumura; Yuichi Yamashita; Goro Watanabe; Kunitoshi Nakagawa; Taizo Kimura; Tatsuo Yamakawa; Go Wakabayashi; Itaru Endo; Masaru Miyazaki; Masakazu Yamamoto
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 7.027

4.  Preoperative evaluation to predict technical difficulties of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the basis of histological inflammation findings on resected gallbladder.

Authors:  S Sakuramoto; S Sato; T Okuri; K Sato; Y Hiki; A Kakita
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 5.  MR imaging of acute biliary disorders.

Authors:  Yuji Watanabe; Masako Nagayama; Akira Okumura; Yoshiki Amoh; Takashi Katsube; Tsuyoshi Suga; Shingo Koyama; Kohya Nakatani; Yoshihiro Dodo
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 6.  Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos).

Authors:  Go Wakabayashi; Yukio Iwashita; Taizo Hibi; Tadahiro Takada; Steven M Strasberg; Horacio J Asbun; Itaru Endo; Akiko Umezawa; Koji Asai; Kenji Suzuki; Yasuhisa Mori; Kohji Okamoto; Henry A Pitt; Ho-Seong Han; Tsann-Long Hwang; Yoo-Seok Yoon; Dong-Sup Yoon; In-Seok Choi; Wayne Shih-Wei Huang; Mariano Eduardo Giménez; O James Garden; Dirk J Gouma; Giulio Belli; Christos Dervenis; Palepu Jagannath; Angus C W Chan; Wan Yee Lau; Keng-Hao Liu; Cheng-Hsi Su; Takeyuki Misawa; Masafumi Nakamura; Akihiko Horiguchi; Nobumi Tagaya; Shuichi Fujioka; Ryota Higuchi; Satoru Shikata; Yoshinori Noguchi; Tomohiko Ukai; Masamichi Yokoe; Daniel Cherqui; Goro Honda; Atsushi Sugioka; Eduardo de Santibañes; Avinash Nivritti Supe; Hiromi Tokumura; Taizo Kimura; Masahiro Yoshida; Toshihiko Mayumi; Seigo Kitano; Masafumi Inomata; Koichi Hirata; Yoshinobu Sumiyama; Kazuo Inui; Masakazu Yamamoto
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 7.027

Review 7.  Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Kohji Okamoto; Kenji Suzuki; Tadahiro Takada; Steven M Strasberg; Horacio J Asbun; Itaru Endo; Yukio Iwashita; Taizo Hibi; Henry A Pitt; Akiko Umezawa; Koji Asai; Ho-Seong Han; Tsann-Long Hwang; Yasuhisa Mori; Yoo-Seok Yoon; Wayne Shih-Wei Huang; Giulio Belli; Christos Dervenis; Masamichi Yokoe; Seiki Kiriyama; Takao Itoi; Palepu Jagannath; O James Garden; Fumihiko Miura; Masafumi Nakamura; Akihiko Horiguchi; Go Wakabayashi; Daniel Cherqui; Eduardo de Santibañes; Satoru Shikata; Yoshinori Noguchi; Tomohiko Ukai; Ryota Higuchi; Keita Wada; Goro Honda; Avinash Nivritti Supe; Masahiro Yoshida; Toshihiko Mayumi; Dirk J Gouma; Daniel J Deziel; Kui-Hin Liau; Miin-Fu Chen; Kazunori Shibao; Keng-Hao Liu; Cheng-Hsi Su; Angus C W Chan; Dong-Sup Yoon; In-Seok Choi; Eduard Jonas; Xiao-Ping Chen; Sheung Tat Fan; Chen-Guo Ker; Mariano Eduardo Giménez; Seigo Kitano; Masafumi Inomata; Koichi Hirata; Kazuo Inui; Yoshinobu Sumiyama; Masakazu Yamamoto
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 7.027

8.  The diagnostic utility of HASTE MRI in the evaluation of acute cholecystitis. Half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo SE.

Authors:  F Regan; D C Schaefer; D P Smith; J D Petronis; M E Bohlman; T H Magnuson
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Definitions, pathophysiology, and epidemiology of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines.

Authors:  Yasutoshi Kimura; Tadahiro Takada; Yoshifumi Kawarada; Yuji Nimura; Koichi Hirata; Miho Sekimoto; Masahiro Yoshida; Toshihiko Mayumi; Keita Wada; Fumihiko Miura; Hideki Yasuda; Yuichi Yamashita; Masato Nagino; Masahiko Hirota; Atsushi Tanaka; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Steven M Strasberg; Thomas R Gadacz
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2007-01-30

10.  Comparison of early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: experience from a single center.

Authors:  Rouf Gul; Rayees Ahmad Dar; Riyaz Ahmad Sheikh; Nazir Ahmad Salroo; Adnan Rashid Matoo; Sabiya Hamid Wani
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2013-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.