Jieni Li1,2,3, Tiange Yu1,2,4, Irum Javed1,2, Chaitanya Siddagunta1,2, Ratna Pakpahan1, Marvin E Langston1,5, Leslie K Dennis6, Darrel M Kingfield7, David J Moore8, Gerald L Andriole9, H Henry Lai9,10, Graham A Colditz1, Siobhan Sutcliffe1. 1. Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. 2. Brown School at Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri. 3. STATinMED Research, Plano, Texas. 4. engage2Health, Health Advocate, Westlake Village, California. 5. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California. 6. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona. 7. Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, NOAA/OAR/ESRL/Global Systems Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado. 8. School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona. 9. Division of Urological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. 10. Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To investigate whether meteorological factors (temperature, barometric pressure, relative humidity, ultraviolet index [UVI], and seasons) trigger flares in male and female urologic chronic pelvic pain patients. METHODS: We assessed flare status every 2 weeks in our case-crossover study of flare triggers in the Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain 1-year longitudinal study. Flare symptoms, flare start date, and exposures in the 3 days preceding a flare or the date of questionnaire completion were assessed for the first three flares and at three randomly selected nonflare times. We linked these data to daily temperature, barometric pressure, relative humidity, and UVI values by participants' first 3 zip code digits. Values in the 3 days before and the day of a flare, as well as changes in these values, were compared to nonflare values by conditional logistic regression. Differences in flare rates by astronomical and growing seasons were investigated by Poisson regression in the full study population. RESULTS: A total of 574 flare and 792 nonflare assessments (290 participants) were included in the case-crossover analysis, and 966 flare and 5389 nonflare (409 participants) were included in the full study analysis. Overall, no statistically significant associations were observed for daily weather, no patterns of associations were observed for weather changes, and no differences in flare rates were observed by season. CONCLUSIONS: We found minimal evidence to suggest that weather triggers flares, although we cannot rule out the possibility that a small subset of patients is susceptible.
BACKGROUND: To investigate whether meteorological factors (temperature, barometric pressure, relative humidity, ultraviolet index [UVI], and seasons) trigger flares in male and female urologic chronic pelvic painpatients. METHODS: We assessed flare status every 2 weeks in our case-crossover study of flare triggers in the Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain 1-year longitudinal study. Flare symptoms, flare start date, and exposures in the 3 days preceding a flare or the date of questionnaire completion were assessed for the first three flares and at three randomly selected nonflare times. We linked these data to daily temperature, barometric pressure, relative humidity, and UVI values by participants' first 3 zip code digits. Values in the 3 days before and the day of a flare, as well as changes in these values, were compared to nonflare values by conditional logistic regression. Differences in flare rates by astronomical and growing seasons were investigated by Poisson regression in the full study population. RESULTS: A total of 574 flare and 792 nonflare assessments (290 participants) were included in the case-crossover analysis, and 966 flare and 5389 nonflare (409 participants) were included in the full study analysis. Overall, no statistically significant associations were observed for daily weather, no patterns of associations were observed for weather changes, and no differences in flare rates were observed by season. CONCLUSIONS: We found minimal evidence to suggest that weather triggers flares, although we cannot rule out the possibility that a small subset of patients is susceptible.
Authors: Karin Zebenholzer; Ernest Rudel; Sophie Frantal; Werner Brannath; Karin Schmidt; Ciçek Wöber-Bingöl; Christian Wöber Journal: Cephalalgia Date: 2010-11-26 Impact factor: 6.292
Authors: Siobhan Sutcliffe; Catherine S Bradley; James Quentin Clemens; Aimee S James; Katy S Konkle; Karl J Kreder; Hing Hung Henry Lai; Sean C Mackey; Cody P Ashe-McNalley; Larissa V Rodriguez; Edward Barrell; Xiaoling Hou; Nancy A Robinson; Chris Mullins; Sandra H Berry Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Geoffrey V Martin; Timothy Houle; Robert Nicholson; Albert Peterlin; Vincent T Martin Journal: Cephalalgia Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 6.292
Authors: J Richard Landis; David A Williams; M Scott Lucia; Daniel J Clauw; Bruce D Naliboff; Nancy A Robinson; Adrie van Bokhoven; Siobhan Sutcliffe; Anthony J Schaeffer; Larissa V Rodriguez; Emeran A Mayer; H Henry Lai; John N Krieger; Karl J Kreder; Niloofar Afari; Gerald L Andriole; Catherine S Bradley; James W Griffith; David J Klumpp; Barry A Hong; Susan K Lutgendorf; Dedra Buchwald; Claire C Yang; Sean Mackey; Michel A Pontari; Philip Hanno; John W Kusek; Chris Mullins; J Quentin Clemens Journal: BMC Urol Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 2.264
Authors: Alberto Herrero Babiloni; Fernando G Exposto; Connor M Peck; Bruce R Lindgren; Marc O Martel; Christophe Lenglet; David A Bereiter; Lynn E Eberly; Estephan J Moana-Filho Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 4.996