Olusesan Ayodeji Makinde1,2, Clifford Obby Odimegwu3, Mojisola O Udoh4, Sunday A Adedini5, Joshua O Akinyemi6, Akinyemi Atobatele7, Opeyemi Fadeyibi8, Fatima Abdulaziz Sule2, Stella Babalola9, Nosakhare Orobaton10. 1. Viable Helpers Development Organization , Abuja, Nigeria. 2. Viable Knowledge Masters , Abuja, Nigeria. 3. Demography and Population Studies Program, Schools of Public Health and Social Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg, South Africa. 4. Department of Pathology, University of Benin/University of Benin Teaching Hospital , Benin-City, Nigeria. 5. Vaccine and Infectious Disease Analytics Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg, South Africa. 6. Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan , Ibadan, Nigeria. 7. Monitoring and Evaluations Unit, United States Agency for International Development , Abuja, Nigeria. 8. Health Department, World Bank , Abuja, Nigeria. 9. Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, MD, USA. 10. MNCH Program Strategy Team, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation , Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Death registration provides an opportunity for the legal documentation of death of persons. Documentation of deaths has several implications including its use in the recovery of inheritance and insurance benefits. It is also an important input for construction of life tables which are crucial for national planning. However, the registration of deaths is poor in several countries including Nigeria. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the performance of death registration in Nigeria and factors that may affect its performance. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review of death registration completeness in Nigeria to identify, characterize issues as well as challenges associated with realizing completeness in death registration. RESULTS: Only 13.5% of deaths in Nigeria were registered in 2007 which regressed to 10% in 2017. There was no data reported for Nigeria in the World Health Organization database between 2008 and 2017. The country scored less than 0.1 (out of a maximum of 1) on the Vital Statistics Performance Index. There are multiple institutions with parallel constitutional and legal responsibilities for death registration in Nigeria including the National Population Commission, National Identity Management Commission and Local Government Authorities, which may be contributing to its overall poor performance. CONCLUSIONS: We offer proposals to substantially improve death registration completeness in Nigeria including the streamlining and merger of the National Population Commission and the National Identity Management Commission into one commission, the revision of the legal mandate of the new agency to mainly coordination and establishment of standards. We recommend that Local Government authorities maintain the local registries given their proximity to households. This arrangement will be enhanced by increased utilization of information and communications technology in Civil Registration and Vital Statistics processes that ensure records are properly archived.
BACKGROUND:Death registration provides an opportunity for the legal documentation of death of persons. Documentation of deaths has several implications including its use in the recovery of inheritance and insurance benefits. It is also an important input for construction of life tables which are crucial for national planning. However, the registration of deaths is poor in several countries including Nigeria. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the performance of death registration in Nigeria and factors that may affect its performance. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review of death registration completeness in Nigeria to identify, characterize issues as well as challenges associated with realizing completeness in death registration. RESULTS: Only 13.5% of deaths in Nigeria were registered in 2007 which regressed to 10% in 2017. There was no data reported for Nigeria in the World Health Organization database between 2008 and 2017. The country scored less than 0.1 (out of a maximum of 1) on the Vital Statistics Performance Index. There are multiple institutions with parallel constitutional and legal responsibilities for death registration in Nigeria including the National Population Commission, National Identity Management Commission and Local Government Authorities, which may be contributing to its overall poor performance. CONCLUSIONS: We offer proposals to substantially improve death registration completeness in Nigeria including the streamlining and merger of the National Population Commission and the National Identity Management Commission into one commission, the revision of the legal mandate of the new agency to mainly coordination and establishment of standards. We recommend that Local Government authorities maintain the local registries given their proximity to households. This arrangement will be enhanced by increased utilization of information and communications technology in Civil Registration and Vital Statistics processes that ensure records are properly archived.
Entities:
Keywords:
Civil registration; death certificates; death registration; demography; governance; health planning; outcome evaluation; sustainable development goals; vital statistics
Authors: Prasanta Mahapatra; Kenji Shibuya; Alan D Lopez; Francesca Coullare; Francis C Notzon; Chalapati Rao; Simon Szreter Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-11-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Michel Garenne; Mark A Collinson; Chodziwadziwa W Kabudula; F Xavier Gómez-Olivé; Kathleen Kahn; Stephen Tollman Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: James C Thomas; Eva Silvestre; Shannon Salentine; Heidi Reynolds; Jason Smith Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2016-06-13 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Emeka Francis Okonji; Osaretin Christabel Okonji; Ferdinand C Mukumbang; Brian Van Wyk Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Blake Angell; Olutobi Sanuade; Ifedayo M O Adetifa; Iruka N Okeke; Aishatu Lawal Adamu; Muktar H Aliyu; Emmanuel A Ameh; Fatima Kyari; Muktar A Gadanya; Diana A Mabayoje; Adesola Yinka-Ogunleye; Tolu Oni; Rabiu Ibrahim Jalo; Fatimah I Tsiga-Ahmed; Sarah L Dalglish; Seye Abimbola; Tim Colbourn; Obinna Onwujekwe; Eme Theodora Owoaje; Gambo Aliyu; Sani H Aliyu; Belinda Archibong; Alex Ezeh; Chikwe Ihekweazu; Zubairu Iliyasu; Stephen Obaro; Ebenezer Babatunde Obadare; Friday Okonofua; Muhammed Pate; Babatunde L Salako; Fatima H Zanna; Scott Glenn; Ally Walker; Maha Ezalarab; Mohsen Naghavi; Ibrahim Abubakar Journal: Lancet Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 79.321