Antoine Dionne1, Andréane Richard-Denis1,2, Victor Lim1, Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong3,4,5. 1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Pavillon Roger-Gaudry, S-749, C.P. 6128, succ. Centre-ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada. 2. Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, 5400 Gouin Boul. West, Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada. 3. Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Pavillon Roger-Gaudry, S-749, C.P. 6128, succ. Centre-ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada. jean-marc.mac-thiong@umontreal.ca. 4. Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, 5400 Gouin Boul. West, Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada. jean-marc.mac-thiong@umontreal.ca. 5. Sainte-Justine University Hospital Research Center, 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada. jean-marc.mac-thiong@umontreal.ca.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of data from a prospective database of a Level 1 trauma center. OBJECTIVES: This project aims to identify factors collected during the acute and rehabilitative care following a traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) associated with success and failure to return home after inpatient intensive functional rehabilitation (IFR). SETTING: Level 1 trauma center specialized in TSCI care in Montreal, Canada. METHODS: All eligible patients from our prospective database were separated into two groups according to discharge destination following IFR. Clinical variables collected during the acute and rehabilitative care as well as demographic variables were compared between patients who managed to return home (Group 1) and those who were discharged elsewhere (Group 2). Multivariable regression analyses were conducted with variables that were significant at the univariate level. RESULTS: Out of the 193 patients included, 22 (11%) failed to return home following IFR. Six variables were associated with failure to return home at the univariate level: longer acute length of stay (LOS), longer rehabilitation LOS, living alone, higher neurological level of injury, having comorbidities, and having a pressure injury (PI) during acute care. Three variables remained significant at the multivariate level: living alone, increasing acute LOS and presenting a high cervical (C1-C4) neurological level of injury. CONCLUSIONS: It is important that acute care clinicians recognize the aforementioned factors early after TSCI in order to optimize patients for community reintegration.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of data from a prospective database of a Level 1 trauma center. OBJECTIVES: This project aims to identify factors collected during the acute and rehabilitative care following a traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) associated with success and failure to return home after inpatient intensive functional rehabilitation (IFR). SETTING: Level 1 trauma center specialized in TSCI care in Montreal, Canada. METHODS: All eligible patients from our prospective database were separated into two groups according to discharge destination following IFR. Clinical variables collected during the acute and rehabilitative care as well as demographic variables were compared between patients who managed to return home (Group 1) and those who were discharged elsewhere (Group 2). Multivariable regression analyses were conducted with variables that were significant at the univariate level. RESULTS: Out of the 193 patients included, 22 (11%) failed to return home following IFR. Six variables were associated with failure to return home at the univariate level: longer acute length of stay (LOS), longer rehabilitation LOS, living alone, higher neurological level of injury, having comorbidities, and having a pressure injury (PI) during acute care. Three variables remained significant at the multivariate level: living alone, increasing acute LOS and presenting a high cervical (C1-C4) neurological level of injury. CONCLUSIONS: It is important that acute care clinicians recognize the aforementioned factors early after TSCI in order to optimize patients for community reintegration.