Literature DB >> 32890896

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the excluded stomach after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A case report and literature review.

Wagner A Nascimento1, Carlos Eduardo S Macedo1, Fernando Santa-Cruz2, Henrique G B Coelho3, Daniel T Camelo Soares3, Álvaro A B Ferraz4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is an extremely rare condition to occur after bariatric surgery, and most of the reported cases are adenocarcinomas. Regarding gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), there are only two reported cases occurring after bariatric surgery (one after gastric banding and the other following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)). CASE
PRESENTATION: A 48-year-old woman with previous history of obesity and type 2 diabetes, treated with a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass 2 years earlier, was referred to our center due to complains of diffuse abdominal pain and distension associated with asthenia. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a cystic-solid mass located in the right hypochondrium, measuring 19.5 × 13.5 × 16 cm, suggesting the diagnosis of a retroperitoneal tumor. Based on these findings, a laparotomy, evidencing that the larger cystic-solid tumor was originating from the excluded stomach post-RYGB. The gastrectomy of the excluded stomach was performed aside with a conventional cholecystectomy. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry confirmed to be a gastric GIST with epithelioid cells. Currently, 12 months after surgery, the patient presents no signs of recurrence.
CONCLUSION: This is the second case of gastric GIST occurring after RYGB to be reported in the literature.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; Gastric cancer; Gastrointestinal stromal tumor; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Year:  2020        PMID: 32890896      PMCID: PMC7481502          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep        ISSN: 2210-2612


Introduction

In the last decades, the prevalence of obesity has reached levels higher than a third of the global population. Besides this high prevalence, the morbimortality is also alarming, as it was estimated that obesity and overweight were responsible for 3.4 million deaths in 2010 [1]. Apart from the cardiovascular, endocrine and other pathologies caused by obesity, it is known that patients with this condition are at an increased risk of developing cancer [2]. It is even estimated that almost 20% of cancer cases are intimately related to overweight and obesity. The mechanisms involving carcinogenesis and overweight are related to various factors, such as hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance, oxidative stress and activity of IGF and its binding proteins [3,4]. Among all therapeutic strategies, bariatric surgery seems to be the most effective in treating obesity and its related comorbidities within short and long-term. Bariatric Surgery is one of the most commonly performed gastrointestinal surgeries worldwide. The literature shows that patients undergoing bariatric surgery present a higher incidence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), approximately 0.8% – and generally diagnosed as an incidental finding at the bariatric procedure -, in comparison to the rest of the population, that present an estimated incidence of 14.5 per million and prevalence of 129 per million [5,6]. Although there are some conflicting results about the relationship between bariatric surgery and cancer development, most studies have reported a reduction of the cancer risk in patients who underwent bariatric surgery, especially those obesity related cancers. There are only a few cases of gastric cancer following bariatric surgery and there is still a lack of evidence linking gastric cancer and Bariatric Surgery [[7], [8], [9]]. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, usually expressing the KIT protein and harboring mutations of a gene that encodes a type III tyrosine kinase receptor. It is believed that GIST arises from the interstitial cell of Cajal, the pacemaker cells of the gastrointestinal tract. Both GIST and Cajal cells exhibit neuronal and smooth muscle cell features in immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy [11,12]. Most of the patients are symptomatic, and these symptoms are usually related to the tumor size. The most frequent site of these tumors is the stomach, with a prevalence of 50% [[10], [11], [12], [13]]. Herein, we describe a rare case of GIST of the excluded stomach two years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), the second case reported in english language literature until now. This work has been reported in line with the SCARE criteria [14].

Case presentation

A 48-year old woman presenting moderate abdominal pain, distension, asthenia and weight loss (> 6 kg in one month) attended to a consultation in a secondary local hospital where an abdominal CT was requested. The scans showed a cystic-solid heterogenous complex mass located in the right hypochondrium/mesogastrium, measuring 20 × 14.1 × 12.6 cm. The patient was then referred to our center. At admission, the patient persisted with the complains of diffuse abdominal pain and distension associated with asthenia. The patient reported a previous history of obesity and Type 2 diabetes treated with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) 2 years before. Denied personal or familial history of cancer. At physical examination, there was periumbilical abdominal tenderness, and a moveable fibroelastic mass of approximately 25 × 18 cm was palpated on the right hypochondrium. Laboratory tests indicated the following values: hemoglobin (9.1 g/dL), hematocrit (30.2%), leucocytes (6750/mm3), platelets (339000/mm3), INR (1.15), PPT (27.1 s), fibrinogen (533 mg/dL), Na+ (137.9 mmol/L), K+ (5.1 mmol/L), Cl− (101.3 mmol/L), creatinine (0.6 mg/dL), urea (23.1 mg/dL). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed to be a cystic-solid mass of approximately 19.5 × 13.5 × 16 cm in right anterolateral situation, located between the liver, gallbladder, pancreas head and ascending colon, with thick and irregular walls and multiple septa interspersed with solid areas (Fig. 1-B and C). Furthermore, it showed peripheral contrast-enhancement (Fig. 1-A and D) and multiple cholelithiasis in the gallbladder (Fig. 1-C). The MRI report suggested the diagnosis of an undetermined retroperitoneal tumor.
Fig. 1

Magnetic resonance imaging showing a solid-cystic lesion (A), measuring 19.5 × 13.5 × 16 cm, with thick and irregular walls (D), multiple septa interspersed with solid areas (B), peripheral contrast-enhancement (A, B and D), located in the right hypochondrium, bulging the gallbladder superiorly (C).

Magnetic resonance imaging showing a solid-cystic lesion (A), measuring 19.5 × 13.5 × 16 cm, with thick and irregular walls (D), multiple septa interspersed with solid areas (B), peripheral contrast-enhancement (A, B and D), located in the right hypochondrium, bulging the gallbladder superiorly (C). Based on these findings, an exploratory laparotomy was indicated in December 27th 2018. Intraoperative findings were a large cystic-solid and hypervascular tumor, fulfilling the entire mesogastrium within the peritoneal cavity, with epicenter and origin in the excluded stomach (post-RYGB) (Fig. 2). A gastrectomy of the excluded stomach was performed aside with a conventional cholecystectomy and lymphadenectomy (7 lymph nodes for pathology). The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient got discharged at the 3rd day after surgery.
Fig. 2

Surgical specimen. A large cystic-solid mass arising from the excluded stomach, and the gallbladder without morphological alterations.

Surgical specimen. A large cystic-solid mass arising from the excluded stomach, and the gallbladder without morphological alterations. Histopathological examination confirmed a mesenchymal neoplasm, comprised of atypical epithelioid cells surrounded by a partially hyalinized stroma, presenting 1 mitotic figure per 50 high power fields (Fig. 3). Surgical margins were clear and there were no signs of neoplastic invasion in none of the excised lymph nodes. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) showed DOG1 (+), CD34 (+) and cKit (−) (Fig. 3). The proliferation index Ki-67 was 10%. These findings confirmed a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with epithelioid cells.
Fig. 3

Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining showing mesenchymal neoplasm, comprised of atypical epithelioid cells surrounded by a partially hyalinized stroma. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) positive for DOG1 CD34 and negative cKit.

Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining showing mesenchymal neoplasm, comprised of atypical epithelioid cells surrounded by a partially hyalinized stroma. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) positive for DOG1 CD34 and negative cKit. Currently, around 12 months after surgery, the patient is free of disease, presenting no signs of recurrence nor metastasis, reporting a good quality of life, with no physical complains.

Discussion

GISTs are rare malignant tumors, with only two case reported in the literature after bariatric surgery according to our knowledge: one after RYGB and one after gastrectomy banding (GB). The mean age at diagnosis of GIST after bariatric surgery among the two cases reported and ours is 49.33 ± 3.67 years, and all of them occurred in women [13,15]. Contrastingly, the literature shows a major prevalence at the age of 60 s for GISTs in general (Table 1) [12].
Table 1

Previous reported cases of GISTs after bariatric surgery.

AuthorSexAgeBSTimeaClinical presentationDiagnosisIHCTreatmentPrognosis
Our caseF48RYGB2 yearsAbdominal tenderness + anemiaCT + MRIDOG1 (+)CD34 (+)cKIT (−)Gastrectomy (excluded stomach) + dudodenal suture + cholecystectomyWithout signs of recurrence 12 months after surgery
De Roover et al. [13]F47GB12 yearsProgressive dysphagia + vomitingEndoscopy + exploratory laparotomyCD117 (+)cKIT (+)Total gastrectomy.Imatinib after recurrence.Recurrence 3 years after the procedure. Good response to Imatinib
Abellan et al. [15]F53RYGB7 yearsAsymptomaticIncidental (at an appendectomy)cKIT (+)Gastrectomy of the residual stomachNot reported

BS: bariatric surgery; RYGB: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; GB: gastric banding; IHC: immunohistochemistry; CT: computed tomography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.

Time between BS and GIST diagnosis.

Previous reported cases of GISTs after bariatric surgery. BS: bariatric surgery; RYGB: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; GB: gastric banding; IHC: immunohistochemistry; CT: computed tomography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging. Time between BS and GIST diagnosis. There is a large spectrum in the symptomatology of GIST, and gastrointestinal bleeding appears to be the most prevalent one, followed by bowel obstruction. Overall, this bleeding lead to abdominal pain and anemia, as seen in the current case. GIST patients can also exhibit dysphagia as reported by DeRoover et al., or even asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally, just as described by Aberllan [12,13,15,16]. The mainstay treatment of this neoplasm, when localized and resectable, is primarily surgery, aiming to resect the entire tumor with an intact pseudocapsule, taking special care to avoid tumor rupture, which is intimately related to poor prognosis [11]. Surgical treatment can be both curative or palliative. The curative surgery is the standard treatment, usually effective, but can be harder depending on the tumor location: gastro-esophageal junction, lesser curve, posterior wall, antrum and pylorus are considered unfavorable locations. Laparoscopy is as effective as open surgeries, especially in patients with tumors smaller than 8 cm [17,18]. On the other hand, for those patients where there is metastatic disease, surgery does not seem to be as effective. In these cases, and in unresectable GISTs, the use of Imatinib is the standard therapy. Imatinib is a tyrosine Kinase inhibitor of KIT and PDGRFA receptors that can also be used as adjuvant therapy to prevent tumor recurrence [11,19]. Not only GISTs are reported in patients after bariatric surgery. Most reports of post-bariatric gastric cancer cases are adenocarcinomas. However, Mackenzie et al., in a cohort study compared 8794 obese post bariatric surgery patients with the same number of patients who did not underwent surgery, and found that, in general, there is a decrease in the cancer development rate in those patients who have undergone the procedure [9,20]. These findings are reinforced by De Siqueira et al., that reported a significant decrease in the expression of potential cancer proteins in obese patients after bariatric surgery [21]. The prognosis of patients with GIST is often favorable, with a 5-year survival rate after surgery of 65%. Nevertheless, several factors can interfere in the prognosis, such as age, tumor site, mitotic index, tumor size, occurrence of curative resection and postoperative imatinib. Alongside, there are some studies showing relation between immunohistochemistry and prognosis, such as c-Kit and CD-34 positivity as a potential good outcome. On the other hand, DOG1 positivity, found in our patient, seems to be a potential poor outcome marker [[22], [23], [24]]. Moreover, literature shows that GISTs showing large dimensions (over 9,5 cm), such as the current case, present higher chance of accelerate growth in a short period of time [25]. In those cases of GIST following bariatric surgery, there is still a lack of data in the literature due to the rarity of the condition. Notwithstanding, it is possible that our patient may require further interventions to treat an eventual recurrence or metastases, such as happened in the case described by DeRoover et al. [7,13]. The main limitation of our case is the fact that there are no details regarding the previous RYGB since it was performed in another state and the patient did not carry any exams nor the surgical report of this operation. Furthermore, the patient reported that she did not undergo an esophagogastroduodenoscopy before the RYGB, so it is not possible to determine whether the tumor was already in the stomach or not at that time.

Conclusion

To sum up, among the three cases of GIST after bariatric surgery ever reported in the literature to date, only two cases were reportedly symptomatic. Our case stands as the first cKIT (−) GIST after bariatric surgery to be reported.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.

Funding

The authors declare no financial support.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Federal University of Pernambuco, under the registration number CAAE 277734620.0.0000.8807.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.

Author’s contribution

Study concept and design: CESM, NSL, AABF. Data Collection: WAN, DTCS, MARCA. Data Analysis and interpretation: WAN, CESM, MARCA. Writing the paper: WAN, FSC, HGBC. Revision: CESM, NSL, AABF.

Registration of research studies

N/A.

Guarantor

Wagner A. Nascimento.

Provenance and peer review

Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.
  25 in total

Review 1.  Incidental gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in the excluded stomach after Roux- en-Y gastric bypass: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  I Abellán; D Ruíz de Angulo; P Parrilla
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 4.734

2.  The SCARE 2018 statement: Updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines.

Authors:  Riaz A Agha; Mimi R Borrelli; Reem Farwana; Kiron Koshy; Alexander J Fowler; Dennis P Orgill
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 3.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).

Authors:  H Joensuu
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): a size-matched comparison.

Authors:  Giorgos C Karakousis; Samuel Singer; Junting Zheng; Mithat Gonen; Daniel Coit; Ronald P DeMatteo; Vivian E Strong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Gastric mesenchymal tumors as incidental findings during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Everton Cazzo; Helena Paes de Almeida de Saito; José Carlos Pareja; Elinton Adami Chaim; Francisco Callejas-Neto; João de Souza Coelho-Neto
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 4.734

6.  A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

Authors:  Stephen S Lim; Theo Vos; Abraham D Flaxman; Goodarz Danaei; Kenji Shibuya; Heather Adair-Rohani; Markus Amann; H Ross Anderson; Kathryn G Andrews; Martin Aryee; Charles Atkinson; Loraine J Bacchus; Adil N Bahalim; Kalpana Balakrishnan; John Balmes; Suzanne Barker-Collo; Amanda Baxter; Michelle L Bell; Jed D Blore; Fiona Blyth; Carissa Bonner; Guilherme Borges; Rupert Bourne; Michel Boussinesq; Michael Brauer; Peter Brooks; Nigel G Bruce; Bert Brunekreef; Claire Bryan-Hancock; Chiara Bucello; Rachelle Buchbinder; Fiona Bull; Richard T Burnett; Tim E Byers; Bianca Calabria; Jonathan Carapetis; Emily Carnahan; Zoe Chafe; Fiona Charlson; Honglei Chen; Jian Shen Chen; Andrew Tai-Ann Cheng; Jennifer Christine Child; Aaron Cohen; K Ellicott Colson; Benjamin C Cowie; Sarah Darby; Susan Darling; Adrian Davis; Louisa Degenhardt; Frank Dentener; Don C Des Jarlais; Karen Devries; Mukesh Dherani; Eric L Ding; E Ray Dorsey; Tim Driscoll; Karen Edmond; Suad Eltahir Ali; Rebecca E Engell; Patricia J Erwin; Saman Fahimi; Gail Falder; Farshad Farzadfar; Alize Ferrari; Mariel M Finucane; Seth Flaxman; Francis Gerry R Fowkes; Greg Freedman; Michael K Freeman; Emmanuela Gakidou; Santu Ghosh; Edward Giovannucci; Gerhard Gmel; Kathryn Graham; Rebecca Grainger; Bridget Grant; David Gunnell; Hialy R Gutierrez; Wayne Hall; Hans W Hoek; Anthony Hogan; H Dean Hosgood; Damian Hoy; Howard Hu; Bryan J Hubbell; Sally J Hutchings; Sydney E Ibeanusi; Gemma L Jacklyn; Rashmi Jasrasaria; Jost B Jonas; Haidong Kan; John A Kanis; Nicholas Kassebaum; Norito Kawakami; Young-Ho Khang; Shahab Khatibzadeh; Jon-Paul Khoo; Cindy Kok; Francine Laden; Ratilal Lalloo; Qing Lan; Tim Lathlean; Janet L Leasher; James Leigh; Yang Li; John Kent Lin; Steven E Lipshultz; Stephanie London; Rafael Lozano; Yuan Lu; Joelle Mak; Reza Malekzadeh; Leslie Mallinger; Wagner Marcenes; Lyn March; Robin Marks; Randall Martin; Paul McGale; John McGrath; Sumi Mehta; George A Mensah; Tony R Merriman; Renata Micha; Catherine Michaud; Vinod Mishra; Khayriyyah Mohd Hanafiah; Ali A Mokdad; Lidia Morawska; Dariush Mozaffarian; Tasha Murphy; Mohsen Naghavi; Bruce Neal; Paul K Nelson; Joan Miquel Nolla; Rosana Norman; Casey Olives; Saad B Omer; Jessica Orchard; Richard Osborne; Bart Ostro; Andrew Page; Kiran D Pandey; Charles D H Parry; Erin Passmore; Jayadeep Patra; Neil Pearce; Pamela M Pelizzari; Max Petzold; Michael R Phillips; Dan Pope; C Arden Pope; John Powles; Mayuree Rao; Homie Razavi; Eva A Rehfuess; Jürgen T Rehm; Beate Ritz; Frederick P Rivara; Thomas Roberts; Carolyn Robinson; Jose A Rodriguez-Portales; Isabelle Romieu; Robin Room; Lisa C Rosenfeld; Ananya Roy; Lesley Rushton; Joshua A Salomon; Uchechukwu Sampson; Lidia Sanchez-Riera; Ella Sanman; Amir Sapkota; Soraya Seedat; Peilin Shi; Kevin Shield; Rupak Shivakoti; Gitanjali M Singh; David A Sleet; Emma Smith; Kirk R Smith; Nicolas J C Stapelberg; Kyle Steenland; Heidi Stöckl; Lars Jacob Stovner; Kurt Straif; Lahn Straney; George D Thurston; Jimmy H Tran; Rita Van Dingenen; Aaron van Donkelaar; J Lennert Veerman; Lakshmi Vijayakumar; Robert Weintraub; Myrna M Weissman; Richard A White; Harvey Whiteford; Steven T Wiersma; James D Wilkinson; Hywel C Williams; Warwick Williams; Nicholas Wilson; Anthony D Woolf; Paul Yip; Jan M Zielinski; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray; Majid Ezzati; Mohammad A AlMazroa; Ziad A Memish
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Obesity as a major risk factor for cancer.

Authors:  Giovanni De Pergola; Franco Silvestris
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2013-08-29

8.  Parallelism of DOG1 expression with recurrence risk in gastrointestinal stromal tumors bearing KIT or PDGFRA mutations.

Authors:  Francesca Maria Rizzo; Raffaele Palmirotta; Andrea Marzullo; Nicoletta Resta; Mauro Cives; Marco Tucci; Franco Silvestris
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  The cut-off value of tumor size and appropriate timing of follow-up for management of minimal EUS-suspected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Zhidong Gao; Chao Wang; Qian Xue; Jingtong Wang; Zhanlong Shen; Kewei Jiang; Kai Shen; Bin Liang; Xiaodong Yang; Qiwei Xie; Shan Wang; Yingjiang Ye
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 10.  Imatinib treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST).

Authors:  Lisandro F Lopes; Carlos E Bacchi
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 5.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.