Carlos Navarro Cuéllar1, Elena Bullejos Martínez2, Ignacio Navarro Cuéllar3, Ana María López López2, Manuel Tousidonis Rial3, Arturo Sánchez Pérez4, José Ignacio Salmerón Escobar5. 1. Associate Professor, Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: cnavarrocuellar@gmail.com. 2. Assistant Professor, Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. 3. Assistant Professor, Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón Madrid, Spain. 4. Assistant Professor, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain. 5. Professor and Head, Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Oncological patients who undergo bilateral subtotal maxillectomies develop functional and esthetic sequelae that require immediate reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the primary reconstruction of maxillary defects with fibula flap and dental implants assisted by virtual surgical planning (VSP) and to assess the postoperative outcomes compared with standard surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was designed between January 2016 and April 2020 with 12 oncologic patients who underwent subtotal bilateral maxillectomy. Six consecutive patients were treated by standard surgical procedure (SS) at the beginning of the study. In 2018, the VSP was implemented, and 6 consecutive patients were treated using this technique. All patients were rehabilitated with Ticare implants and implant prostheses. Anatomic position of the bone, bone apposition, change of vertical distance, and horizontal shift, the operative and ischemia time, the esthetic results, and the functional rehabilitation were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The position of the bone in anatomical position was 100% in the VSP group vs 66% in the SS group. The bone apposition was 100% in the VSP group vs 83.3%. The change of vertical distance and the horizontal shift were lower in the VSP group (P < .05). The ischemia time and operative time were shorter in the VSP group (P < .05). A good esthetic result was achieved in 83.3% in the VSP group vs 33.3% in the SS group; 81 dental implants and 1 zygomatic implant were placed. The success rate was 95% in the VSP group and 92.6% in the SS group. All patients were rehabilitated with implant prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: VSP improves the accuracy of midface reconstruction (class IIC defect) with a better anatomical position of the bone, a higher rate of bone contact, and a lower change in vertical distance compared with standard surgery. It significantly improves the esthetic result, reduces ischemia time, and operation time.
PURPOSE: Oncological patients who undergo bilateral subtotal maxillectomies develop functional and esthetic sequelae that require immediate reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the primary reconstruction of maxillary defects with fibula flap and dental implants assisted by virtual surgical planning (VSP) and to assess the postoperative outcomes compared with standard surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was designed between January 2016 and April 2020 with 12 oncologic patients who underwent subtotal bilateral maxillectomy. Six consecutive patients were treated by standard surgical procedure (SS) at the beginning of the study. In 2018, the VSP was implemented, and 6 consecutive patients were treated using this technique. All patients were rehabilitated with Ticare implants and implant prostheses. Anatomic position of the bone, bone apposition, change of vertical distance, and horizontal shift, the operative and ischemia time, the esthetic results, and the functional rehabilitation were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The position of the bone in anatomical position was 100% in the VSP group vs 66% in the SS group. The bone apposition was 100% in the VSP group vs 83.3%. The change of vertical distance and the horizontal shift were lower in the VSP group (P < .05). The ischemia time and operative time were shorter in the VSP group (P < .05). A good esthetic result was achieved in 83.3% in the VSP group vs 33.3% in the SS group; 81 dental implants and 1 zygomatic implant were placed. The success rate was 95% in the VSP group and 92.6% in the SS group. All patients were rehabilitated with implant prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: VSP improves the accuracy of midface reconstruction (class IIC defect) with a better anatomical position of the bone, a higher rate of bone contact, and a lower change in vertical distance compared with standard surgery. It significantly improves the esthetic result, reduces ischemia time, and operation time.
Authors: Gustaaf J C van Baar; Kitty Schipper; Tymour Forouzanfar; Lars Leeuwrik; Henri A H Winters; Angela Ridwan-Pramana; Frank K J Leusink Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 4.241