Literature DB >> 32888933

Using Geospatial Analysis to Evaluate Access to Lung Cancer Screening in the United States.

Liora Sahar1, Vanhvilai L Douangchai Wills2, Ka Kit Liu2, Ella A Kazerooni3, Debra S Dyer4, Robert A Smith2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening current and former heavy smokers 55 to 80 years of age for lung cancer (LC) with low-dose chest CT scanning has been recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force since 2013. Although the number of screening facilities in the United States has increased, screening uptake has been slow. RESEARCH QUESTION: To what extent is geographic access to screening facilities a barrier for screening uptake nationally? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Screening facilities were defined as American College of Radiology (ACR) Lung Cancer Screening Registry (LCSR) facilities. Analysis was performed at different geographic levels using a road network to calculate travel distances for the recommended age groups. Full access to screening was defined as the entire 55- to 79-year-old population being within 40 miles of an ACR LCSR facility. No access was defined as lack of access by the entire target population. Partial access was expressed in intervening quartiles. A geospatial approach then was used to integrate accessibility with smoking prevalence and LC mortality rates to identify potential focus areas visually.
RESULTS: Screening facilities addresses were geocoded to identify 3,592 unique locations. Analysis of census tracts and aggregation to counties revealed that among 3,142 counties, adults 55 to 79 years of age have full access to an LC screening registry facility in 1,988 (63%) counties, partial access in 587 (19%) counties, and no access in 567 (18%) counties. Overall, less than 6% of those 55 to 79 years of age do not have access to registry screening facilities. Variation in screening facility access was noted across the United States, between states, and within some states.
INTERPRETATION: It is recommended to calculate accessibility using subcounty geographies and to examine variation regionally and within states. A foundation geographic accessibility layer can be integrated with other variables to identify geographic disparities in access to screening and to focus on areas for interventions. Identifying areas of greatest need can inform state and local officials and healthcare organizations when planning and implementing LC screening programs.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  access to screening; geographic information science; lung cancer

Year:  2020        PMID: 32888933     DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.08.2081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  3 in total

1.  Distribution and Geographic Accessibility of Lung Cancer Screening Centers in the United States.

Authors:  Soumya J Niranjan; William Opoku-Agyeman; Nathaniel W Carroll; Amanda Dorsey; Meghan Tipre; Monica L Baskin; Mark T Dransfield
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2021-09

2.  Lung Cancer Diagnosed Through Screening, Lung Nodule, and Neither Program: A Prospective Observational Study of the Detecting Early Lung Cancer (DELUGE) in the Mississippi Delta Cohort.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Wei Liao; Nicholas R Faris; Meghan Meadows-Taylor; Carrie Fehnel; Jordan Lane; Sara C Williams; Anita A Patel; Olawale A Akinbobola; Alicia Pacheco; Amanda Epperson; Joy Luttrell; Denise McCoy; Laura McHugh; Raymond Signore; Anna M Bishop; Keith Tonkin; Robert Optican; Jeffrey Wright; Todd Robbins; Meredith A Ray; Matthew P Smeltzer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 50.717

3.  Access to Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration: Does Geographic Distribution Match Need in the Population?

Authors:  Jacqueline H Boudreau; Donald R Miller; Shirley Qian; Eduardo R Nunez; Tanner J Caverly; Renda Soylemez Wiener
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 10.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.