Thomas J Galloway1, Luiz Paulo Kowalski2, Leandro L Matos3, Gilberto Castro Junior4, John A Ridge5. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA. Electronic address: thomas.galloway@fccc.edu. 2. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology, A C Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil. 3. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo ICESP, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil; Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil. 4. Department of Clinical Oncology, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo ICESP, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil. 5. Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
We read the recent international consensus recommendations from Hisham Mehanna and colleagues in The Lancet Oncology regarding head and neck surgical practice in the setting of resource constraint due to the COVID-19 pandemic with great interest. However, the sections dedicated to the prioritisation of treatment should be considered controversial, even though the methodology employed is well regarded. The monograph characterised treatment of advanced head and neck cancer with “do not delay surgery; operate within 4 weeks of diagnosis”, while adopting a more permissive policy toward T1–T2 N0 oral cancer and T1 N0 laryngeal cancer: “do not delay surgery beyond 8 or 12 weeks”. Although it seems logical to assign high treatment priority to advanced tumours in a setting of resource constraint, the limited data testing the precept do not fully support these recommendations.Head and neck squamous cancers progress at a rate that can be measured in the course of typical clinical practice. Node progression due to prolonged time to treatment initiation replaces stage I–II with stage III–IV cancer. The survival impact of such progression is reflected in the staging system. In a setting of resource constraint the crucial issue should be consideration of which outcome is most affected by prolonged time to begin treatment. Which is more detrimental to survival: T1 N0 progressing to T1 N1 or T3 N2b developing greater node burden?Murphy and colleagues addressed this question for squamous cancers. A treatment delay of 31–60 days adversely affects survival for stage I–II head and neck cancer (HR 1·17; 95% CI 1·12–1·23), but not stage III-IV (1·02; 0·99–1·07). A similar relation exists for longer delays of 61–90 days for early stage (HR 1·54; 95% CI 1·41–1·68) and advanced stage (1·08; 1·02–1·14) squamous cancer. Delay in treatment more significantly affects survival of stage I–II head and neck cancer than stage III–IV. Although it seems logical to operate on a patient soon to become formally unresectable or develop more advanced nodal disease, the data suggest that stage I–II patients (with a more favourable prognosis before progression) will derive greater benefit.The COVID-19 pandemic creates challenges in the management of patients with head and neck cancer. Allocation of scarce resources will be difficult. Available data, not solely expert opinion, should be employed when assigning priorities.
Authors: Colin T Murphy; Thomas J Galloway; Elizabeth A Handorf; Brian L Egleston; Lora S Wang; Ranee Mehra; Douglas B Flieder; John A Ridge Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Karl Y Bilimoria; Clifford Y Ko; James S Tomlinson; Andrew K Stewart; Mark S Talamonti; Denise L Hynes; David P Winchester; David J Bentrem Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Hisham Mehanna; John C Hardman; Jared A Shenson; Ahmad K Abou-Foul; Michael C Topf; Mohammad AlFalasi; Jason Y K Chan; Pankaj Chaturvedi; Velda Ling Yu Chow; Andreas Dietz; Johannes J Fagan; Christian Godballe; Wojciech Golusiński; Akihiro Homma; Sefik Hosal; N Gopalakrishna Iyer; Cyrus Kerawala; Yoon Woo Koh; Anna Konney; Luiz P Kowalski; Dennis Kraus; Moni A Kuriakose; Efthymios Kyrodimos; Stephen Y Lai; C Rene Leemans; Paul Lennon; Lisa Licitra; Pei-Jen Lou; Bernard Lyons; Haitham Mirghani; Anthonny C Nichols; Vinidh Paleri; Benedict J Panizza; Pablo Parente Arias; Mihir R Patel; Cesare Piazza; Danny Rischin; Alvaro Sanabria; Robert P Takes; David J Thomson; Ravindra Uppaluri; Yu Wang; Sue S Yom; Yi-Ming Zhu; Sandro V Porceddu; John R de Almeida; Chrisian Simon; F Christopher Holsinger Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 41.316