Literature DB >> 32888080

A combination of subcuticular sutures and subcutaneous closed-suction drainage reduces the risk of incisional surgical site infection in loop ileostomy closure.

Kohei Fukuoka1, Fumikazu Koyama2,3, Hiroyuki Kuge1, Shinsaku Obara1, Takayuki Nakamoto1,4, Yosuke Iwasa1, Takeshi Takei1, Yayoi Matsumoto1, Tomomi Sadamitsu1, Masayuki Sho1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a wound closure method using a combination of subcuticular sutures and subcutaneous closed-suction drainage (SS closure) for preventing incisional surgical site infection (SSI) in loop ileostomy closure.
METHODS: A total of 178 consecutive patients who underwent loop ileostomy closure at Nara Medical University Hospital between 2004 and 2018 were retrospectively assessed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the conventional skin closure (CC) group from 2004 to 2009 (75 patients) and the SS closure (SS) group from 2010 to 2018 (103 patients). The incidence of incisional SSI was compared between the two groups, and the factors associated with incisional SSI were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Incisional SSI occurred in 7 cases (9.3%) in the CC group but was significantly reduced to only 1 case (0.9%) in the SS group (p = 0.034). In the univariate analysis, the hemoglobin levels, serum creatinine levels, and SS closure were associated with incisional SSI. SS closure was the only independent preventive factor for incisional SSI according to the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio = 0.24, p = 0.011).
CONCLUSION: The combination of subcuticular sutures and subcutaneous closed-suction drainage may be a promising way of preventing incisional SSI in loop ileostomy closure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Closed-suction drainage; Loop ileostomy closure; Subcuticular suture; Surgical site infection

Year:  2020        PMID: 32888080     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02128-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  2 in total

1.  Stoma closure and wound infection: an evaluation of risk factors.

Authors:  D J Hackam; O D Rotstein
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  The effectiveness of negative-pressure wound therapy for wound healing after stoma reversal: a randomised control study (SR-PICO study).

Authors:  Sohyun Kim; Sung Il Kang
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.279

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.