Nan Meng1,2, Xuejia Wang3, Jing Sun4, Dongming Han3, Yan Bai1,2, Wei Wei1,2, Zhe Wang5, Fei Jia3, Kaiyu Wang6, Meiyun Wang7,8. 1. Department of Radiology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital & Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. 2. Academy of Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. 3. Department of MR, the First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Zhengzhou Central Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. 5. Department of Anesthesiology, the Third Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China. 6. MR Research China, GE Healthcare, Beijing, China. 7. Department of Radiology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital & Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. mywang@ha.edu.cn. 8. Academy of Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. mywang@ha.edu.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the value of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions and analyze the correlations between the derived parameters and prognostic factors of breast cancer. METHODS: One hundred thirty-five women underwent breast APTWI and DKI. The magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym (3.5 ppm)), apparent kurtosis coefficient (Kapp), and non-Gaussian diffusion coefficient (Dapp) were calculated according to the histological subtype, grade, and prognostic factors (Ki-67, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2), lymph node metastasis, and maximum lesion diameter). The differences, efficacy, and correlation between the parameters were determined. RESULTS: The Kapp value was higher and the Dapp and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) values were lower in the malignant group than in the benign group (all p < 0.001; AUC (Kapp) = 0.913, AUC (Dapp) = 0.910, and AUC (MTRasym (3.5 ppm)) = 0.796). The differences in the AUC between Kapp and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) and between Dapp and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) were significant (p = 0.023, 0.046). Kapp was moderately correlated with the pathological grade (|r| = 0.724) and mildly correlated with Ki-67 and HER-2 expression (|r| = 0.454, 0.333). Dapp was moderately correlated with the pathological grade (|r| = 0.648) and mildly correlated with Ki-67 expression (|r| = 0.400). MTRasym (3.5 ppm) was only mildly correlated with the pathological grade (|r| = 0.468). CONCLUSION: DKI is superior to APTWI in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions. Each parameter is correlated with some prognostic factors to a certain extent. KEY POINTS: • DKI and APTWI provide valuable information regarding lesion characterization. • Kapp, Dapp, and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) are valid parameters for the characterization of tissue microstructure. • DKI is superior to APTWI in the study of breast cancer.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the value of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions and analyze the correlations between the derived parameters and prognostic factors of breast cancer. METHODS: One hundred thirty-five women underwent breast APTWI and DKI. The magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym (3.5 ppm)), apparent kurtosis coefficient (Kapp), and non-Gaussian diffusion coefficient (Dapp) were calculated according to the histological subtype, grade, and prognostic factors (Ki-67, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), humanepidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2), lymph node metastasis, and maximum lesion diameter). The differences, efficacy, and correlation between the parameters were determined. RESULTS: The Kapp value was higher and the Dapp and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) values were lower in the malignant group than in the benign group (all p < 0.001; AUC (Kapp) = 0.913, AUC (Dapp) = 0.910, and AUC (MTRasym (3.5 ppm)) = 0.796). The differences in the AUC between Kapp and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) and between Dapp and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) were significant (p = 0.023, 0.046). Kapp was moderately correlated with the pathological grade (|r| = 0.724) and mildly correlated with Ki-67 and HER-2 expression (|r| = 0.454, 0.333). Dapp was moderately correlated with the pathological grade (|r| = 0.648) and mildly correlated with Ki-67 expression (|r| = 0.400). MTRasym (3.5 ppm) was only mildly correlated with the pathological grade (|r| = 0.468). CONCLUSION: DKI is superior to APTWI in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions. Each parameter is correlated with some prognostic factors to a certain extent. KEY POINTS: • DKI and APTWI provide valuable information regarding lesion characterization. • Kapp, Dapp, and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) are valid parameters for the characterization of tissue microstructure. • DKI is superior to APTWI in the study of breast cancer.
Entities:
Keywords:
APT; Breast neoplasms; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
Authors: Ashley M Mendez; Lauren K Fang; Claire H Meriwether; Summer J Batasin; Stéphane Loubrie; Ana E Rodríguez-Soto; Rebecca A Rakow-Penner Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 5.738