| Literature DB >> 32887939 |
Yuying Lv1, Xiurong Zhang1, Lu Luo1, Hui Yang1, Pinghua Li1, Kun Zhang1, Fengzhen Liu2, Yongshan Wan3.
Abstract
GPAT, the rate-limiting enzyme in triacylglycerol (TAG) synthesis, plays an important role in seed oil accumulation. In this study, two AhGPAT9 genes were individually cloned from the A- and B- genomes of peanut, which shared a similarity of 95.65%, with 165 site differences. The overexpression of AhGPAT9 or the knock-down of its gene expression increased or decreased the seed oil content, respectively. Allelic polymorphism analysis was conducted in 171 peanut germplasm, and 118 polymorphic sites in AhGPAT9A formed 64 haplotypes (a1 to a64), while 94 polymorphic sites in AhGPAT9B formed 75 haplotypes (b1 to b75). The haplotype analysis showed that a5, b57, b30 and b35 were elite haplotypes related to high oil content, whereas a7, a14, a48, b51 and b54 were low oil content types. Additionally, haplotype combinations a62/b10, a38/b31 and a43/b36 were associated with high oil content, but a9/b42 was a low oil content haplotype combination. The results will provide valuable clues for breeding new lines with higher seed oil content using hybrid polymerization of high-oil alleles of AhGPAT9A and AhGPAT9B genes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32887939 PMCID: PMC7474056 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71578-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Sequence analysis of peanut AhGPAT9 genes. (A) Gene structure of AhGPAT9A and AhGPAT9B. The UTRs are indicated with dark blue boxes, and the exons and introns are shown in yellow and green, respectively. The numbers are the sequence lengths. (B) Sequence alignment of AhGPAT9 proteins with related GPATs from other plants. "*" indicates an amino acid difference between AhGPAT9A and AhGPAT9B. The boxed motifs I, II, III and IV are conserved domains for acyltransferase. The catalytic activity centers are indicated by blue triangles, and the binding sites of the substrate are indicated by red circles. (C) Transmembrane domain prediction for AhGPAT9A and AhGPAT9B in TMHMM. The x-axis shows the amino acids, and the y-axis shows the posterior probabilities. (D) Phylogenetic tree based on the deduced amino acid sequences of GPATs. The amino acid sequences from other species are indicated as follows: At, Arabidopsis thaliana; Gm, Glycine max; Br, Brassica napus; Mt, Medicago truncatula; Vu, Vigna unguiculata; Vr, Vigna radiate; Va, Vigna angularis; Ci, Cicer arietinum; Gr, Gossypium raimondii; He, Helianthus annuus; Sm, Selaginella moellendorffii; Tc, Theobroma cacao; Vv, Vitis vinifera; Cs, Citrus sinensis; Cc, Cajanus cajan; Ap, Abrus precatorius; Vf, Vernicia fordii; Mm, Mus musculus; Jc, Jatropha curcas; Hs, Homo sapiens; Os, Oryza sativa.
Figure 2Expression analysis of AhGPAT9 using qRT-PCR in different peanut tissues and at seed development stages. R, root; ST, stem; F, flower; SD, seed. The relative mRNA abundance was normalized with respect to that of peanut AhACT11. The bars indicate the standard deviations (SD) of three replications.
Figure 3Identification of putative AhGPAT9 transgenic plants and the seed oil contents of transgenic plants. (A) The expression vectors containing the sense and anti-sense sequences of the AhGPAT9 gene. Sense and anti-sense AhGPAT9 gene fragments were inserted into the pGPVE vector between the BamHI and NotI restriction sites. LB, left border; RB, right border; NOS Pro is the promoter of the nopaline synthase gene; Bar gene, phosphinothricin acetyltransferase; 35S, cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. (B) Identification of transgenic plants showing overexpression and antisense-expression of the AhGPAT9 genes. G represents the recombinant plasmids, M is a 1,000 bp DNA marker and FH2 represents the wild-type (WT). G1-4, G1-1, G1-2, G9-2, G9-6, G9-1, and G9-6 were OE transgenic plants, and R1-9, R1-1, R1-3, R1-4, R1-5, R12-1 and R12-3 were AE transgenic plants. (C) Oil content distribution of transgenic T1 seeds. FH2, wild-type control including 14 plants; GT1, AhGPAT9-overexpressing transgenic T1 peanut line including 20 plants; RT1, antisense-expressing transgenic T1 peanut line including 24 plants. The box contains 50% of the data points. The black and red bars across the boxes represent the medians and means, respectively. The top and bottom ends of the ‘whiskers’ represented the highest and lowest values observed, respectively. Black dots represent outliers. (D) Seed oil content of T2 AhGPAT9 overexpressing transgenic peanut plants. Mean G1-4 T2 indicates the mean of seven G1-4 transformants; Mean G9-2 T2 indicates the mean of seven G9-2 transformants; Mean G T2 indicates the mean of 14 G1-4 and G9-2 transformants. Values are the average seed oil percentage ± SD (n = 7 and 7 for G1-4 and G9-2, respectively). (E) Seed oil content of homozygous T2 AhGPAT9 anti-sense expressing transgenic peanut plants. Mean R1-1 T2 indicates the mean of five R1-1 transformants; Mean R12-3 T2 indicates the mean of seven R12-3 transformants; Mean R T2 indicates the mean of 10 R1-1 and R12-3 transformants. Values are the average seed oil percentage ± SD (n = 5 and 5 for R1-1 and R12-3, respectively). (F) Expression analysis of AhGPAT9 in T3 transgenic lines. Total RNA was prepared from the transgenic lines. Gene expression levels are shown relative to the expression of AhACT11 in each sample. Values are means ± SDs (n = 3). The transcription level of each gene in the wild-type FH2 was set as 1. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the FH2 and transgenic lines at p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.05 (*). (G) Effect of AhGPAT9 overexpression and antisense expression on the seed oil content of T3 lines. Values are means ± SDs (n = 10).
Figure 4Clustering analysis of 171 peanut germplasm based on allelic polymorphisms from AhGPAT9A (A) and AhGPAT9B (B). The germplasm of the same haplotype are indicated in one color, and the a1 and b1 haplotypes are colored in blue.
Characteristics of different protein types encoded by AhGPAT9 in peanut germplasm.
| Protein type | Non-synonymous mutations | Amino acid differences | G3P binding sites | Catalytic centers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AP1 | – | – | Met256, | His171, Asp176 |
| AP2 | Ag.4941 T > C | p.F365S | – | His171, Asp176 |
| AP3 | Ag.1789G > A | p.S127N | His171, Asp176 | |
| AP4 | Ag.2874G > A Ag.3035A > C | p.R162Q· p.T184P· | Gly56, Ala57, Asp60, Ser62, | His171, Asp176 |
| AP5 | Ag.44A > G | p.E15G | Met256, | His171, Asp176 |
| AP6 | Ag.4595G > T | p.G346 | Met256, | His171, Asp176 |
| AP7 | Ag.4947A > G Ag.4950C > T | p.E367G p.S368F | – | – |
| AP8 | Ag.38A > G | p.E13G | Met256, | His171, Asp176 |
| AP9 | Ag.1720 T > C Ag.1798A > G | p.L104S p.K130R | Met256, | His171, Asp176 |
| AP10 | Ag.38A > G Ag.1720 T > C Ag.1798A > G | p.E13G p.L104S p.K130R | Met256, | His171, Asp176 |
| AP11 | Ag.2804A > G | p.M139V | Gly56, Ala57, Asp60, Ser62, | His171, Asp176 |
| AP12 | Ag.883G > A | p.V95I | Val118, His119, Leu122, Ile204, Met256, | His171, Asp176 |
| BP1 | – | – | Val118, His119, Leu122, Ile204, Met256, | His171, Asp176 |
| BP2 | Bg.4328 T > C Bg.4344 T > C | p.L291F p.L296P | Met256, | His171, Asp176 |
| BP3 | Bg.4323A > G | p.Q289R | Met256, | His171, Asp176 |
| BP4 | Bg.4344 T > C | p.L296P | Met256, | His171, Asp176 |
| BP5 | Bg.4193A > G | p.N276S | – | – |
| BP6 | Bg.1747G > A | p.A114T | – | – |
| BP7 | Bg.1733 T > C | p.M109T | – | His171, Asp176 |
Protein types AP1 to AP12 were obtained from AhGPAT9A, while BP1 to BP7 were obtained from AhGPAT9B, and their amino acid differences compared with AP1 and BP1, respectively, were determined. p.F365S indicates a change from phenylalanine to serine at amino acid no.365 in AP2. · indicates that the amino acid changes were located in the acyltransferase domain. * indicates that the amino acid was terminal. The amino acids Phe, Glu and Arg in bold format represent typical G3P binding sites in GPAT9 proteins.
Figure 5Proteins spatial structure prediction of AhGPAT9. AP1 to AP12 were obtained from AhGPAT9A, and BP1 to BP7 were obtained from AhGPAT9B. The spatial structures were predicted by using the online software I-TASSER (https://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/).
Detection of oil content in 171 peanut germplasm.
| Year | Min | Max | Mean | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 46.52 | 56.89 | 50.97 | 2.06 | 4.03 | 0.43 | − 0.17 | 84.6 |
| 2015 | 42.41 | 57.29 | 48.41 | 2.50 | 5.16 | 0.51 | 0.30 | |
| 2016 | 42.65 | 56.93 | 48.61 | 2.43 | 5.00 | 0.62 | 0.74 | |
| 2017 | 40.01 | 57.78 | 50.08 | 2.44 | 4.87 | − 0.34 | 1.71 | |
| Mean | 43.73 | 56.89 | 49.52 | 2.07 | 4.18 | 0.40 | 0.56 |
SD, standard deviations; CV, coefficient of variation; Sk, skewness; Ku, kurtosis; h2 = [VG/(VG + VE)] × 100%, where VG is genotypic variance and VE is environmental variance.
Figure 6Phenotypic distribution histograms of seed oil content in peanut germplasm. The x-axis shows groups with different oil content ranges, and the y-axis shows the number of lines in each group.
Elite haplotype selection of AhGPAT9 for oil content in peanut germplasm.
| Type | Haplotype combination | Protein combination | Oil content (%) | Phenotypic effect (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AP1/BP1 | 54.05 ± 0.97aA | 9.23 | ||
| AP2/BP1 | 47.84 ± 2.04cBC | − 3.32 | ||
| AP12/BP1 | 46.62 ± 1.99cdCD | − 5.79 | ||
| AP1/BP1 | 45.72 ± 1.30dD | − 7.61 | ||
| – | 49.48 ± 1.12bB | – | ||
| AP1/BP1 | 56.89 ± 0.81aA | 14.54 | ||
| AP1/BP1 | 54.59 ± 0.70bAB | 9.91 | ||
| AP1/BP1 | 53.98 ± 1.19bB | 8.68 | ||
| AP1/BP7 | 49.71 ± 1.75cC | 0.09 | ||
| AP1/BP1 | 44.29 ± 1.31dD | − 10.83 | ||
| AP1/BP1 | 43.73 ± 1.71dD | − 11.95 | ||
| – | 49.67 ± 1.03cC | – | ||
| AP1/BP1 | 53.60 ± 1.67aA | 7.52 | ||
| AP3/BP6 | 52.70 ± 1.25bAB | 5.72 | ||
| AP4/BP1 | 52.34 ± 1.47bB | 5.00 | ||
| AP7/BP1 | 45.93 ± 1.31dD | − 7.86 | ||
| – | 49.85 ± 1.11cC | – |
The phenotypic effects suggested that the oil content of germplasm of a certain type (a−/b−) was increased or decreased compared with the references in the same groups, which were a−/b1 for type a, a1/b– for type b, and a1/b1 for type a/b. Different capital and lowercase letters indicate significant differences within groups at p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively.