Literature DB >> 32887804

Polar amplification of Pliocene climate by elevated trace gas radiative forcing.

Peter O Hopcroft1, Gilles Ramstein2, Thomas A M Pugh3,4, Stephen J Hunter5, Fabiola Murguia-Flores6,7, Aurélien Quiquet2,8, Yong Sun2,9, Ning Tan2,10, Paul J Valdes6.   

Abstract

Warm periods in Earth's history offer opportunities to understand the dynamics of the Earth system under conditions that are similar to those expected in the near future. The Middle Pliocene warm period (MPWP), from 3.3 to 3.0 My B.P, is the most recent time when atmospheric CO2 levels were as high as today. However, climate model simulations of the Pliocene underestimate high-latitude warming that has been reconstructed from fossil pollen samples and other geological archives. One possible reason for this is that enhanced non-CO2 trace gas radiative forcing during the Pliocene, including from methane (CH4), has not been included in modeling. We use a suite of terrestrial biogeochemistry models forced with MPWP climate model simulations from four different climate models to produce a comprehensive reconstruction of the MPWP CH4 cycle, including uncertainty. We simulate an atmospheric CH4 mixing ratio of 1,000 to 1,200 ppbv, which in combination with estimates of radiative forcing from N2O and O3, contributes a non-CO2 radiative forcing of 0.9 [Formula: see text] (range 0.6 to 1.1), which is 43% (range 36 to 56%) of the CO2 radiative forcing used in MPWP climate simulations. This additional forcing would cause a global surface temperature increase of 0.6 to 1.0 °C, with amplified changes at high latitudes, improving agreement with geological evidence of Middle Pliocene climate. We conclude that natural trace gas feedbacks are critical for interpreting climate warmth during the Pliocene and potentially many other warm phases of the Cenezoic. These results also imply that using Pliocene CO2 and temperature reconstructions alone may lead to overestimates of the fast or Charney climate sensitivity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GCM; Pliocene; biogeochemistry; methane; trace gas; wetland

Year:  2020        PMID: 32887804      PMCID: PMC7519348          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2002320117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  21 in total

1.  Pliocene and Eocene provide best analogs for near-future climates.

Authors:  K D Burke; J W Williams; M A Chandler; A M Haywood; D J Lunt; B L Otto-Bliesner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  SEA-LEVEL RISE. Sea-level rise due to polar ice-sheet mass loss during past warm periods.

Authors:  A Dutton; A E Carlson; A J Long; G A Milne; P U Clark; R DeConto; B P Horton; S Rahmstorf; M E Raymo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Making sense of palaeoclimate sensitivity.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Plio-Pleistocene climate sensitivity evaluated using high-resolution CO2 records.

Authors:  M A Martínez-Botí; G L Foster; T B Chalk; E J Rohling; P F Sexton; D J Lunt; R D Pancost; M P S Badger; D N Schmidt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  High-resolution alkenone palaeobarometry indicates relatively stable pCO(2) during the Pliocene (3.3-2.8 Ma).

Authors:  Marcus P S Badger; Daniela N Schmidt; Andreas Mackensen; Richard D Pancost
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Improved attribution of climate forcing to emissions.

Authors:  Drew T Shindell; Greg Faluvegi; Dorothy M Koch; Gavin A Schmidt; Nadine Unger; Susanne E Bauer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Climate change and trace gases.

Authors:  James Hansen; Makiko Sato; Pushker Kharecha; Gary Russell; David W Lea; Mark Siddall
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Understanding the glacial methane cycle.

Authors:  Peter O Hopcroft; Paul J Valdes; Fiona M O'Connor; Jed O Kaplan; David J Beerling
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Simulation of Eocene extreme warmth and high climate sensitivity through cloud feedbacks.

Authors:  Jiang Zhu; Christopher J Poulsen; Jessica E Tierney
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Bayesian Analysis of the Glacial-Interglacial Methane Increase Constrained by Stable Isotopes and Earth System Modeling.

Authors:  Peter O Hopcroft; Paul J Valdes; Jed O Kaplan
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2018-04-22       Impact factor: 4.720

View more
  1 in total

1.  Atmospheric CO2 during the Mid-Piacenzian Warm Period and the M2 glaciation.

Authors:  Elwyn de la Vega; Thomas B Chalk; Paul A Wilson; Ratna Priya Bysani; Gavin L Foster
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.