| Literature DB >> 32887485 |
Stefan Stuppner1,2, Sophia Mayr1, Anel Beganovic1, Krzysztof Beć1, Justyna Grabska1, Urban Aufschnaiter1, Magdalena Groeneveld1, Matthias Rainer1, Thomas Jakschitz2, Günther K Bonn1,2, Christian W Huck1.
Abstract
Elderberry (Sambucus nigra L., fructus) is a very potent herbal drug, deriving from traditional European medicine (TEM). Ripe elderberries are rich in anthocyanins, flavonols, flavonol esters, flavonol glycosides, lectins, essential oils, unsaturated fatty acids and vitamins. Nevertheless, unripe elderflower fruits contain a certain amount of sambunigrin, a toxic cyanogenic glycoside, whose concentration decreases in the ripening process. Therefore, quality assurance must be carried out. The standard method described in literature is the photometric determination (pH-differential method) of the total anthocyanin content (TAC) that is the highest when the berries are ripe. The drawback of the pH-differential method is the extensive sample preparation and the low accuracy of the method. Therefore, the goal of this publication was to develop a fast non invasive near-infrared (NIR) method for the determination of TAC in whole berries. TAC of elderberries was measured using pH-differentiation method where TAC values of 632.87 mg/kg to 4342.01 mg/kg were measured. Additionally, cyanidin-3-O-glucoside, cyanidin-3-O-sambubioside and cyanidin-3-O-sambubioside-5-O-glucoside which represent more than 98% of TAC in elderberry were quantified using ultra high performance liquid chromatography-multiple wavelength detection-ultra high resolution-quadrupole-time of flight-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MWD-UHR-Q-TOF-MS) and their sum parameter was determined, ranging between 499.43 mg/kg and 8199.07 mg/kg. Using those two methods as reference, whole elderberries were investigated by NIR spectroscopy with the Büchi NIRFlex N-500 benchtop spectrometer. According to the constructed partial least squares regression (PLSR) models the performance was as follows: a relative standard deviation (RSDPLSR) of 13.5% and root mean square error of calibration (RMSECV/RMSEC) of 1.31 for pH-differentiation reference and a RSDPLSR of 12.9% and RMSECV/RMSEC of 1.28 for the HPLC reference method. In this study, we confirm that it is possible to perform a NIR screening for TAC in whole elderberries. Using quantum chemical calculations, we obtained detailed NIR band assignments of the analyzed compounds and interpreted the wavenumber regions established in PLSR models as meaningful for anthocyanin content. The NIR measurement turned out to be a fast and cost-efficient alternative for the determination of TAC compared to pH-differential method and UHPLC-MWD-UHR-Q-TOF-MS. Due to the benefit of no sample preparation and extraction the technology can be considered as sustainable green technology. With the above mentioned inversely proportional ratio of TAC to total amount of toxic cyanogenic glycosides, NIR proves to be a reliable screening method for the ideal harvest time with maximal content of TAC and lowest content of cyanogenic glycosides in elderberry.Entities:
Keywords: NIR spectroscopy; elderberry; total anthocyanin content (TAC)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32887485 PMCID: PMC7506738 DOI: 10.3390/s20174983
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Overlay of extracted ion chromatograms of Cy-3-sam-5-glu (m/z 743.23) (1), Cy-3-glu (m/z 449.12) (2) and Cy-3-sam (m/z 518.17) as well as UV 279 nm.
Technical characteristics of Büchi NIRFlex N-500 spectrometer.
| Spectral Range | 12,500–4000 cm−1 |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 8 cm−1 |
| Spectra per sample | 9 |
| Scans per sample | 64 |
| Data points | 1501 |
| Light source | Tungsten-halogen lamp |
| Laser type | 12 VDC HeNe, up to 633 nm |
| Monochromator/ | FT-NIR-polarization interferometer with TeO2 wedges |
| Detector | InGaAs |
| Measuring mode | Diffuse reflection |
| Dimensions | 350 × 250 × 450 mm (w × h × d) |
| Measuring cell | NIRFlex solids with spinner add-on |
Figure 2Elderberries compressed for near-infrared (NIR) measurements.
Total anthocyanin content determined by pH-differentiation method.
| Sample | Total Anthocyanin Content Represented as | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|
| S1 | 2428.68 | 18.5 |
| S3 | 3885.30 | 12.9 |
| S6 | 1716.63 | 26.8 |
| S7 | 3121.65 | 33.9 |
| S9 | 3264.08 | 30.1 |
| S10 | 1191.33 | 19.2 |
| S11 | 4342.01 | 23.7 |
| S12 | 898.39 | 24.1 |
| S13 | 2034.47 | 12.9 |
| S14 | 1190.72 | 18.9 |
| S15 | 2879.10 | 17.4 |
| S16 | 1452.55 | 28.3 |
| S17 | 3443.98 | 33.4 |
| S18 | 1820.62 | 33.1 |
| S19 | 1089.76 | 21.2 |
| S20 | 876.83 | 23.7 |
| S21 | 632.87 | 24.1 |
| S22 | 1330.89 | 12.9 |
| S23 | 1132.08 | 11.5 |
| S24 | 656.74 | 12.9 |
| S25 | 624.12 | 11.5 |
| S26 | 1099.06 | 12.7 |
| S27 | 1218.08 | 12.2 |
| S28 | 1447.48 | 4.2 |
| S29 | 1380.31 | 20.0 |
| S30 | 1908.79 | 15.5 |
| S31 | 1851.28 | 11.9 |
| R1 | 168.10 | 25.8 |
| R2 | 121.07 | 33.9 |
| R3 | 235.73 | 30.1 |
| R4 | 276.64 | 13.2 |
| R5 | 172.00 | 20.7 |
| R6 | 206.23 | 25.1 |
| R7 | 240.74 | 17.9 |
Figure 3Extracted ion chromatograms of cyanidin-3-O-glucoside, cyanidin-3-O-sambubioside and cyanidin-3-O-sambubioside-5-O-glucoside.
Total anthocyanin content determined by UHPLC-MWD-UHR-TOF-MS measurements.
| Sample | Total Anthocyanin Content (mg/kg) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|
| S1 | 4491.57 | 2 |
| S3 | 6866.07 | 4 |
| S6 | 2421.38 | 3 |
| S7 | 5718.50 | 5 |
| S9 | 5563.06 | 6 |
| S10 | 2388.63 | 4 |
| S11 | 8311.39 | 3 |
| S12 | 1154.70 | 6 |
| S13 | 2824.30 | 5 |
| S14 | 1560.03 | 1 |
| S15 | 4277.62 | 3 |
| S16 | 2136.57 | 6 |
| S17 | 4211.50 | 5 |
| S18 | 2644.24 | 5 |
| S19 | 1366.76 | 4 |
| S20 | 1196.72 | 5 |
| S21 | 823.35 | 1 |
| S22 | 1710.49 | 2 |
| S23 | 1399.16 | 3 |
| S24 | 783.02 | 1 |
| S25 | 499.43 | 6 |
| S26 | 997.69 | 5 |
| S27 | 674.17 | 2 |
| S28 | 1025.82 | 1 |
| S29 | 1581.02 | 1 |
| S30 | 1289.57 | 2 |
| S31 | 776.00 | 4 |
| R1 | <LOQ | |
| R2 | <LOQ | |
| R3 | <LOQ | |
| R4 | <LOQ | |
| R5 | <LOQ | |
| R6 | <LOQ | |
| R7 | <LOQ |
Figure 4Averaged spectra set of elderberry samples measured with Büchi NIRFlex N-500.
Figure 5NIR spectrum of cyanidin-3-O-glucoside simulated with use of quantum chemical calculations. Two arbitrary bandwidth levels shown for simulated spectra for the purpose of the discussion. Experimental spectrum was measured for pure standard, polycrystalline cyanidin-3-O-glucoside.
Assignments of NIR bands of cyanidin-3-O-glucoside based on quantum chemical calculations.
| Wavenumber [cm—1] | Assignment (a) |
|---|---|
| 6990.7 | |
| 6958.1 | |
| 6840.3 | 2 |
| 6802.7 | 2 |
| 6821.4 | 2 |
| 6782.7 | 2 |
| 6773.5 | 2 |
| 6701.6 | 2 |
| 6588.1 | 2 |
| 6576.4 | 2 |
| 6219.2 | |
| 6173.8 | |
| 6108.6 | |
| 6013.0 | ( |
| 5414.1 | |
| 5324.9 | 2( |
| 5289.9 | ( |
| 5220.8 | 2 |
| 5074.2 | |
| 5024.2 | |
| 4896.3 | |
| 4875.2 | |
| 4839.0 | |
| 4787.7 | |
| 4729.9 | |
| 4680.9 | |
| 4650.1 | |
| 4606.8 | |
| 4585.3 | |
| 4495.7 | |
| 4287.6 | |
| 4190.1 | ( |
| 4084.3 | ( |
(a) Notation used: “2” denotes first overtones; “+” sign denotes combination transitions; ν—stretching mode; δ—deformation mode; as—antisymmetric; s—symmetric (mode).
Figure 6Loadings of the partial least squares regression (PLSR) model correlating NIR spectra of sambucus fructus with UHPLC-MWD-UHR-TOF-MS reference values for TAC.
Parameters of the established partial least squares regression PLSR models.
| Reference Analysis | pH Differentiation | HPLC |
|---|---|---|
| Samples | 27 | 27 |
| Outliers | 3 | 3 |
| Factors | 3 | 3 |
| R2cal | 0.967 | 0.979 |
| R2val | 0.927 | 0.909 |
| RMSECV/RMSEC | 1.31 | 1.28 |
| RSDPLSR | 13.5% | 12.9% |
| Calibration range | 121–4342 * | 499–8311 ** |
* TAC mg/kg expressed as cyanidin-3-O-glycoside, ** summed-up concentration of mg/kg of cyanidin-3-O-glucoside, cyanidin-3-O-sambubioside and cyanidin-3-O-sambubioside-5-O-glucoside.