Literature DB >> 32887190

Cesarean section one hundred years 1920-2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly.

Clarel Antoine1, Bruce K Young1.   

Abstract

In present-day obstetrics, cesarean delivery occurs in one in three women in the United States, and in up to four of five women in some regions of the world. The history of cesarean section extends well over four centuries. Up until the end of the nineteenth century, the operation was avoided because of its high mortality rate. In 1926, the Munro Kerr low transverse uterine incision was introduced and became the standard method for the next 50 years. Since the 1970's, newer surgical techniques gradually became the most commonly used method today because of intraoperative and postpartum benefits. Concurrently, despite attempts to encourage vaginal birth after previous cesareans, the cesarean delivery rate increased steadily from 5 to 30-32% over the last 10 years, with a parallel increase in costs as well as short- and long-term maternal, neonatal and childhood complications. Attempts to reduce the rate of cesarean deliveries have been largely unsuccessful because of the perceived safety of the operation, short-term postpartum benefits, the legal climate and maternal request in the absence of indications. In the United States, as the cesarean delivery rate has increased, maternal mortality and morbidity have also risen steadily over the last three decades, disproportionately impacting black women as compared to other races. Extensive data on the prenatal diagnosis and management of cesarean-related abnormal placentation have improved outcomes of affected women. Fewer data are available however for the improvement of outcomes of cesarean-related gynecological conditions. In this review, the authors address the challenges and opportunities to research, educate and change health effects associated with cesarean delivery for all women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean delivery; cesarean section; surgical technique; uterine closure; vaginal birth after cesarean

Year:  2020        PMID: 32887190     DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Med        ISSN: 0300-5577            Impact factor:   1.901


  8 in total

1.  The Anesthetic Effect and Safety of Dexmedetomidine in Cesarean Section: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gang Pang; Yuanmao Zhu; Yan Zhou; Shanshan Tong
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  Investigating service delivery and perinatal outcomes during the low prevalence first year of COVID-19 in a multiethnic Australian population: a cohort study.

Authors:  Sarah J Melov; James Elhindi; Therese M McGee; Vincent W Lee; N Wah Cheung; Seng Chai Chua; Justin McNab; Thushari I Alahakoon; Dharmintra Pasupathy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA.

Authors:  Rahul S Yerrabelli; Nicholas Peterman; Bradley Kaptur; Eunhae Yeo; Kristine Carpenter
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-07-15

4.  Validation and Clinical Utility of the Korean Version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery Score (ObsQoR-11) Following Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  RyungA Kang; Seungwon Lee; Eunkyung Lee; Yoon Jee Cho; Ji Seon Jeong; Soo Joo Choi; Mi Sook Gwak; Woo Seog Sim; Duk Kyung Kim; Justin Sangwook Ko
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-24

5.  Demonstration of the application of the global cesarean section rate model (C-Model) and the Robson Classification to estimate and characterize excess numbers of institutional c-sections

Authors:  John Jairo Zuleta-Tobón
Journal:  Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol       Date:  2021-12-30

Review 6.  Effect of Intravenous Ketamine on Hypocranial Pressure Symptoms in Patients with Spinal Anesthetic Cesarean Sections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoshen Liang; Xin Yang; Shuang Liang; Yu Zhang; Zhuofeng Ding; Qulian Guo; Changsheng Huang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Birth Order, Caesarean Section, or Daycare Attendance in Relation to Child- and Adult-Onset Type 1 Diabetes: Results from the German National Cohort.

Authors:  Justine Tanoey; Christina Baechle; Hermann Brenner; Andreas Deckert; Julia Fricke; Kathrin Günther; André Karch; Thomas Keil; Alexander Kluttig; Michael Leitzmann; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Nadia Obi; Tobias Pischon; Tamara Schikowski; Sabine M Schipf; Matthias B Schulze; Anja Sedlmeier; Ilais Moreno Velásquez; Katharina S Weber; Henry Völzke; Wolfgang Ahrens; Sylvia Gastell; Bernd Holleczek; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Verena Katzke; Wolfgang Lieb; Karin B Michels; Börge Schmidt; Henning Teismann; Heiko Becher
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Prediction of Scar Myometrium Thickness and Previous Cesarean Scar Defect Using the Three-Dimensional Vaginal Ultrasound.

Authors:  Liang Shi; Keke Du
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.009

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.