Emilie Wawer1,2, Marie Viprey3,4, Bernard Floccard5, Mohamed Saoud2, Fabien Subtil6,7, Hashim Wafa4, Elodie Rheims2, Thomas Rimmelé5, Emmanuel Poulet1. 1. Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Service des Urgences Psychiatriques, Lyon, France. 2. Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Service de Psychiatrie de l'adulte, Lyon, France. 3. Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service des Données de Santé, Lyon, France. 4. Univ. Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, HESPER EA 7425, Lyon, France. 5. Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lyon, France. 6. Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Santé Publique, Service de Biostatistique, Lyon, France. 7. Université Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Impact Event Scale-Revisited assessed following ICU discharge to predict the emergence of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms at 3 months. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Three medical or surgical ICU of a French university hospital (Lyon, France). PATIENTS: Patients greater than or equal to 18 years old, leaving ICU after greater than or equal to 2 nights of stay, between September 2017 and April 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Patients completed the Impact Event Scale-Revisited and the Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire within 8 days after ICU discharge and the Impact Event Scale-Revisited again at 3 months by phone. Patients having an Impact Event Scale-Revisited greater than or equal to 35 at 3 months were considered as having post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among the 208 patients screened, 174 were included and 145 reassessed by phone at 3 months. Among the patients included at baseline, 43% presented symptoms of acute stress. At 3 months, 13% had an Impact Event Scale-Revisited greater than or equal to 35 and 17% had a score between 12 and 34. Regarding the performance of the Impact Event Scale-Revisited performed within 8 days after the ICU discharge to predict post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms at 3 months, the area under the curve was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.80-0.99), and an Impact Event Scale-Revisited greater than or equal to 12 had a sensitivity of 90%, a specificity of 71%, a positive predictive value of 32%, and a negative predictive value of 98%. History of anxiety disorder odds ratio = 3.7 (95% CI, 1.24-11.05; p = 0.02) and Impact Event Scale-Revisited greater than or equal to 12 odds ratio = 16.57 (95% CI, 3.59-76.46; p < 0.001) were identified as risk factors for post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Impact Event Scale-Revisited assessed at ICU discharge has a good ability for the detection of patients at risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. Patients with history of anxiety disorder and those presenting acute stress symptoms at ICU discharge are more at risk to develop post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Impact Event Scale-Revisited assessed following ICU discharge to predict the emergence of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms at 3 months. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Three medical or surgical ICU of a French university hospital (Lyon, France). PATIENTS: Patients greater than or equal to 18 years old, leaving ICU after greater than or equal to 2 nights of stay, between September 2017 and April 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Patients completed the Impact Event Scale-Revisited and the Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire within 8 days after ICU discharge and the Impact Event Scale-Revisited again at 3 months by phone. Patients having an Impact Event Scale-Revisited greater than or equal to 35 at 3 months were considered as having post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among the 208 patients screened, 174 were included and 145 reassessed by phone at 3 months. Among the patients included at baseline, 43% presented symptoms of acute stress. At 3 months, 13% had an Impact Event Scale-Revisited greater than or equal to 35 and 17% had a score between 12 and 34. Regarding the performance of the Impact Event Scale-Revisited performed within 8 days after the ICU discharge to predict post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms at 3 months, the area under the curve was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.80-0.99), and an Impact Event Scale-Revisited greater than or equal to 12 had a sensitivity of 90%, a specificity of 71%, a positive predictive value of 32%, and a negative predictive value of 98%. History of anxiety disorder odds ratio = 3.7 (95% CI, 1.24-11.05; p = 0.02) and Impact Event Scale-Revisited greater than or equal to 12 odds ratio = 16.57 (95% CI, 3.59-76.46; p < 0.001) were identified as risk factors for post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Impact Event Scale-Revisited assessed at ICU discharge has a good ability for the detection of patients at risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. Patients with history of anxiety disorder and those presenting acute stress symptoms at ICU discharge are more at risk to develop post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms.