Hayley M Belli1, Sara K Chokshi2, Roshini Hegde3, Andrea B Troxel4, Saul Blecker2,5, Paul A Testa6,7, Judd Anderman6, Christina Wong6, Devin M Mann2,5,6. 1. Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Hayley.Belli@nyulangone.org. 2. Division of Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 3. Fern Health, New York, NY, USA. 4. Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 6. Medical Center Information Technology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA. 7. Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intensive glycemic control is of unclear benefit and carries increased risk for older adults with diabetes. The American Geriatrics Society's (AGS) Choosing Wisely (CW) guideline promotes less aggressive glycemic targets and reduction in pharmacologic therapy for older adults with type II diabetes. Meanwhile, behavioral economic (BE) approaches offer promise in influencing hard-to-change behavior, and previous studies have shown the benefits of using electronic health record (EHR) technology to encourage guideline adherence. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and pilot test an intervention that leverages BE with EHR technology to promote appropriate diabetes management in older adults. DESIGN: A pilot study within the New York University Langone Health (NYULH) EHR and Epic system to deliver BE-inspired nudges at five NYULH clinics at varying time points from July 12, 2018, through October 31, 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Clinicians across five practices in the NYULH system whose patients were older adults (age 76 and older) with type II diabetes. INTERVENTIONS: A BE-EHR module comprising six nudges was developed through a series of design workshops, interviews, user-testing sessions, and clinic visits. BE principles utilized in the nudges include framing, social norming, accountable justification, defaults, affirmation, and gamification. MAIN MEASURES: Patient-level CW compliance. KEY RESULTS: CW compliance increased 5.1% from a 16-week interval at baseline to a 16-week interval post intervention. From February 14 to June 5, 2018 (prior to the first nudge launch in Vanguard clinics), CW compliance for 1278 patients was mean (95% CI)-16.1% (14.1%, 18.1%). From July 3 to October 22, 2019 (after BE-EHR module launch at all five clinics), CW compliance for 680 patients was 21.2% (18.1%, 24.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The BE-EHR module shows promise for promoting the AGS CW guideline and improving diabetes management in older adults. A randomized controlled trial will commence to test the effectiveness of the intervention across 66 NYULH clinics. NIH TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: NCT03409523.
BACKGROUND: Intensive glycemic control is of unclear benefit and carries increased risk for older adults with diabetes. The American Geriatrics Society's (AGS) Choosing Wisely (CW) guideline promotes less aggressive glycemic targets and reduction in pharmacologic therapy for older adults with type II diabetes. Meanwhile, behavioral economic (BE) approaches offer promise in influencing hard-to-change behavior, and previous studies have shown the benefits of using electronic health record (EHR) technology to encourage guideline adherence. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and pilot test an intervention that leverages BE with EHR technology to promote appropriate diabetes management in older adults. DESIGN: A pilot study within the New York University Langone Health (NYULH) EHR and Epic system to deliver BE-inspired nudges at five NYULH clinics at varying time points from July 12, 2018, through October 31, 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Clinicians across five practices in the NYULH system whose patients were older adults (age 76 and older) with type II diabetes. INTERVENTIONS: A BE-EHR module comprising six nudges was developed through a series of design workshops, interviews, user-testing sessions, and clinic visits. BE principles utilized in the nudges include framing, social norming, accountable justification, defaults, affirmation, and gamification. MAIN MEASURES: Patient-level CW compliance. KEY RESULTS: CW compliance increased 5.1% from a 16-week interval at baseline to a 16-week interval post intervention. From February 14 to June 5, 2018 (prior to the first nudge launch in Vanguard clinics), CW compliance for 1278 patients was mean (95% CI)-16.1% (14.1%, 18.1%). From July 3 to October 22, 2019 (after BE-EHR module launch at all five clinics), CW compliance for 680 patients was 21.2% (18.1%, 24.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The BE-EHR module shows promise for promoting the AGS CW guideline and improving diabetes management in older adults. A randomized controlled trial will commence to test the effectiveness of the intervention across 66 NYULH clinics. NIH TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: NCT03409523.
Entities:
Keywords:
behavioral economics; clinical decision support; diabetes; electronic health records
Authors: Lorenzo Moja; Koren H Kwag; Theodore Lytras; Lorenzo Bertizzolo; Linn Brandt; Valentina Pecoraro; Giulio Rigon; Alberto Vaona; Francesca Ruggiero; Massimo Mangia; Alfonso Iorio; Ilkka Kunnamo; Stefanos Bonovas Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Daniella Meeker; Jeffrey A Linder; Craig R Fox; Mark W Friedberg; Stephen D Persell; Noah J Goldstein; Tara K Knight; Joel W Hay; Jason N Doctor Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: William Duckworth; Carlos Abraira; Thomas Moritz; Domenic Reda; Nicholas Emanuele; Peter D Reaven; Franklin J Zieve; Jennifer Marks; Stephen N Davis; Rodney Hayward; Stuart R Warren; Steven Goldman; Madeline McCarren; Mary Ellen Vitek; William G Henderson; Grant D Huang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-12-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tiffany Brown; Theresa A Rowe; Ji Young Lee; Lucia C Petito; Ryan Chmiel; Jody D Ciolino; Jason N Doctor; Craig R Fox; Noah J Goldstein; Darren Kaiser; Jeffrey A Linder; Daniella Meeker; Yaw Peprah; Stephen D Persell Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Hayley M Belli; Andrea B Troxel; Saul B Blecker; Judd Anderman; Christina Wong; Tiffany R Martinez; Devin M Mann Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2021-10-27
Authors: Su-Ying Liang; Cheryl D Stults; Veena G Jones; Qiwen Huang; Jeremy Sutton; Guy Tennyson; Albert S Chan Journal: JMIR Hum Factors Date: 2022-03-30
Authors: Arnold G Vulto; Isabelle Huys; Yannick Vandenplas; Steven Simoens; Florian Turk Journal: Appl Health Econ Health Policy Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 3.686
Authors: Tiffany Brown; Brittany Zelch; Ji Young Lee; Jason N Doctor; Jeffrey A Linder; Mark D Sullivan; Noah J Goldstein; Theresa A Rowe; Daniella Meeker; Tara Knight; Mark W Friedberg; Stephen D Persell Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2022-09-07 Impact factor: 2.762