Literature DB >> 32884130

High throughput assessment of biomarkers in tissue microarrays using artificial intelligence: PTEN loss as a proof-of-principle in multi-center prostate cancer cohorts.

Stephanie A Harmon1,2, Palak G Patel3,4,5, Thomas H Sanford1,6, Isabelle Caven3,4, Rachael Iseman3,4, Thiago Vidotto7, Clarissa Picanço7, Jeremy A Squire4,7, Samira Masoudi1, Sherif Mehralivand1, Peter L Choyke1, David M Berman3,4, Baris Turkbey1, Tamara Jamaspishvili8,9.   

Abstract

Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) loss is associated with adverse outcomes in prostate cancer and has clinical potential as a prognostic biomarker. The objective of this work was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system for automated detection and localization of PTEN loss on immunohistochemically (IHC) stained sections. PTEN loss was assessed using IHC in two prostate tissue microarrays (TMA) (internal cohort, n = 272 and external cohort, n = 129 patients). TMA cores were visually scored for PTEN loss by pathologists and, if present, spatially annotated. Cores from each patient within the internal TMA cohort were split into 90% cross-validation (N = 2048) and 10% hold-out testing (N = 224) sets. ResNet-101 architecture was used to train core-based classification using a multi-resolution ensemble approach (×5, ×10, and ×20). For spatial annotations, single resolution pixel-based classification was trained from patches extracted at ×20 resolution, interpolated to ×40 resolution, and applied in a sliding-window fashion. A final AI-based prediction model was created from combining multi-resolution and pixel-based models. Performance was evaluated in 428 cores of external cohort. From both cohorts, a total of 2700 cores were studied, with a frequency of PTEN loss of 14.5% in internal (180/1239) and external 13.5% (43/319) cancer cores. The final AI-based prediction of PTEN status demonstrated 98.1% accuracy (95.0% sensitivity, 98.4% specificity; median dice score = 0.811) in internal cohort cross-validation set and 99.1% accuracy (100% sensitivity, 99.0% specificity; median dice score = 0.804) in internal cohort test set. Overall core-based classification in the external cohort was significantly improved in the external cohort (area under the curve = 0.964, 90.6% sensitivity, 95.7% specificity) when further trained (fine-tuned) using 15% of cohort data (19/124 patients). These results demonstrate a robust and fully automated method for detection and localization of PTEN loss in prostate cancer tissue samples. AI-based algorithms have potential to streamline sample assessment in research and clinical laboratories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32884130      PMCID: PMC9152638          DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-00674-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   8.209


  39 in total

1.  Digital image analysis outperforms manual biomarker assessment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Gustav Stålhammar; Nelson Fuentes Martinez; Michael Lippert; Nicholas P Tobin; Ida Mølholm; Lorand Kis; Gustaf Rosin; Mattias Rantalainen; Lars Pedersen; Jonas Bergh; Michael Grunkin; Johan Hartman
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014.

Authors:  R Salgado; C Denkert; S Demaria; N Sirtaine; F Klauschen; G Pruneri; S Wienert; G Van den Eynden; F L Baehner; F Penault-Llorca; E A Perez; E A Thompson; W F Symmans; A L Richardson; J Brock; C Criscitiello; H Bailey; M Ignatiadis; G Floris; J Sparano; Z Kos; T Nielsen; D L Rimm; K H Allison; J S Reis-Filho; S Loibl; C Sotiriou; G Viale; S Badve; S Adams; K Willard-Gallo; S Loi
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Genomic deletion of PTEN is associated with tumor progression and early PSA recurrence in ERG fusion-positive and fusion-negative prostate cancer.

Authors:  Antje Krohn; Tobias Diedler; Lia Burkhardt; Pascale-Sophie Mayer; Colin De Silva; Marie Meyer-Kornblum; Darja Kötschau; Pierre Tennstedt; Joseph Huang; Clarissa Gerhäuser; Malte Mader; Stefan Kurtz; Hüseyin Sirma; Fred Saad; Thomas Steuber; Markus Graefen; Christoph Plass; Guido Sauter; Ronald Simon; Sarah Minner; Thorsten Schlomm
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Mitko Veta; Paul Johannes van Diest; Bram van Ginneken; Nico Karssemeijer; Geert Litjens; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Meyke Hermsen; Quirine F Manson; Maschenka Balkenhol; Oscar Geessink; Nikolaos Stathonikos; Marcory Crf van Dijk; Peter Bult; Francisco Beca; Andrew H Beck; Dayong Wang; Aditya Khosla; Rishab Gargeya; Humayun Irshad; Aoxiao Zhong; Qi Dou; Quanzheng Li; Hao Chen; Huang-Jing Lin; Pheng-Ann Heng; Christian Haß; Elia Bruni; Quincy Wong; Ugur Halici; Mustafa Ümit Öner; Rengul Cetin-Atalay; Matt Berseth; Vitali Khvatkov; Alexei Vylegzhanin; Oren Kraus; Muhammad Shaban; Nasir Rajpoot; Ruqayya Awan; Korsuk Sirinukunwattana; Talha Qaiser; Yee-Wah Tsang; David Tellez; Jonas Annuscheit; Peter Hufnagl; Mira Valkonen; Kimmo Kartasalo; Leena Latonen; Pekka Ruusuvuori; Kaisa Liimatainen; Shadi Albarqouni; Bharti Mungal; Ami George; Stefanie Demirci; Nassir Navab; Seiryo Watanabe; Shigeto Seno; Yoichi Takenaka; Hideo Matsuda; Hady Ahmady Phoulady; Vassili Kovalev; Alexander Kalinovsky; Vitali Liauchuk; Gloria Bueno; M Milagro Fernandez-Carrobles; Ismael Serrano; Oscar Deniz; Daniel Racoceanu; Rui Venâncio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  A Prospective Investigation of PTEN Loss and ERG Expression in Lethal Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Thomas U Ahearn; Andreas Pettersson; Ericka M Ebot; Travis Gerke; Rebecca E Graff; Carlos L Morais; Jessica L Hicks; Kathryn M Wilson; Jennifer R Rider; Howard D Sesso; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Richard Flavin; Stephen Finn; Edward L Giovannucci; Massimo Loda; Meir J Stampfer; Angelo M De Marzo; Lorelei A Mucci; Tamara L Lotan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Molecular Biomarkers in Localized Prostate Cancer: ASCO Guideline.

Authors:  Scott E Eggener; R Bryan Rumble; Andrew J Armstrong; Todd M Morgan; Tony Crispino; Philip Cornford; Theodorus van der Kwast; David J Grignon; Alex J Rai; Neeraj Agarwal; Eric A Klein; Robert B Den; Himisha Beltran
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  An augmented reality microscope with real-time artificial intelligence integration for cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen; Krishna Gadepalli; Robert MacDonald; Yun Liu; Shiro Kadowaki; Kunal Nagpal; Timo Kohlberger; Jeffrey Dean; Greg S Corrado; Jason D Hipp; Craig H Mermel; Martin C Stumpe
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Quantitative comparison of immunohistochemical staining measured by digital image analysis versus pathologist visual scoring.

Authors:  Anthony E Rizzardi; Arthur T Johnson; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Stefan E Pambuccian; Jonathan Henriksen; Amy Pn Skubitz; Gregory J Metzger; Stephen C Schmechel
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.644

9.  The need for a personalized approach for prostate cancer management.

Authors:  J P Michiel Sedelaar; Jack A Schalken
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Precision histology: how deep learning is poised to revitalize histomorphology for personalized cancer care.

Authors:  Ugljesa Djuric; Gelareh Zadeh; Kenneth Aldape; Phedias Diamandis
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2017-06-19
View more
  4 in total

1.  A practical evaluation of machine learning for classification of ultrasound images of ovarian development in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus).

Authors:  Clinten A Graham; Hamed Shamkhalichenar; Valentino E Browning; Victoria J Byrd; Yue Liu; M Teresa Gutierrez-Wing; Noel Novelo; Jin-Woo Choi; Terrence R Tierschc
Journal:  Aquaculture       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.242

2.  Integrating morphologic and molecular histopathological features through whole slide image registration and deep learning.

Authors:  Kevin Faust; Michael K Lee; Anglin Dent; Clare Fiala; Alessia Portante; Madhumitha Rabindranath; Noor Alsafwani; Andrew Gao; Ugljesa Djuric; Phedias Diamandis
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2022-01-05

3.  Leveraging artificial intelligence to predict ERG gene fusion status in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vipulkumar Dadhania; Daniel Gonzalez; Mustafa Yousif; Jerome Cheng; Todd M Morgan; Daniel E Spratt; Zachery R Reichert; Rahul Mannan; Xiaoming Wang; Anya Chinnaiyan; Xuhong Cao; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Liron Pantanowitz; Rohit Mehra
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 4.  The PTEN Conundrum: How to Target PTEN-Deficient Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel J Turnham; Nicholas Bullock; Manisha S Dass; John N Staffurth; Helen B Pearson
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 6.600

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.