Literature DB >> 32883579

Development and Validation of WeCares, a Survey Instrument to Assess Hospitalized Patients' and Family Members' "Willingness to Engage in Your Care and Safety".

Po-Yin Yen, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann, Julia Snyder, Kumiko Schnock, Brittany Couture, Ann Smith, Nicole Pearl, Esteban Gershanik, William Martinez, Patricia C Dykes, David W Bates, Sarah Collins Rossetti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient engagement is recognized as a method to improve care quality and safety. A research team developed WeCares (Willingness to Engage in Your Care and Safety), a survey instrument assessing patients' and families' engagement in the safety of their care during their hospital stay. The objective of this study is to establish the preliminary construct validity and internal consistency of WeCares.
METHODS: WeCares was distributed to patients and families. With the survey responses, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to identify the factorial structure of WeCares. The internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Descriptive and comparative analysis was also performed to summarize patients' and families' responses.
RESULTS: A total of 247 patients and families responded to the WeCare survey, of which 224 were used for EFA. EFA resulted in a 13-item, four-factor structure, including (1) comfortable sharing concerns, (2) responsibility for preventing errors, (3) perception of care team members' attitude, and (4) patients'/families' role in preventing errors. The Cronbach alphas were 0.716-0.866, indicating acceptable internal consistency. Overall, patients and families were comfortable sharing concerns with clinicians but preferred to remain anonymous. They believed that the care team members hold most responsibility for error prevention, however, and agreed on their ability to help prevent errors.
CONCLUSION: WeCares was developed to assess patients' and families' willingness to engage. WeCares can also be used to facilitate conversation about safety concerns and shared responsibility. The study team believes this would lead to patient activation in guarding their own care and ultimately improve patient outcomes and safety.
Copyright © 2020 The Joint Commission. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32883579      PMCID: PMC9472245          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf        ISSN: 1553-7250


  39 in total

1.  Speak Up! Addressing the Paradox Plaguing Patient-Centered Care.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Kelly M Smith; Kimberly A Fisher; Thomas H Gallagher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  What can hospitalized patients tell us about adverse events? Learning from patient-reported incidents.

Authors:  Saul N Weingart; Odelya Pagovich; Daniel Z Sands; Joseph M Li; Mark D Aronson; Roger B Davis; David W Bates; Russell S Phillips
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Patient involvement in patient safety: what factors influence patient participation and engagement?

Authors:  Rachel E Davis; Rosamond Jacklin; Nick Sevdalis; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.

Authors:  J Ware; M Kosinski; S D Keller
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  We want to know: patient comfort speaking up about breakdowns in care and patient experience.

Authors:  Kimberly A Fisher; Kelly M Smith; Thomas H Gallagher; Jim C Huang; James C Borton; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  Patients' perspectives on engaging in their healthcare while hospitalised.

Authors:  Teresa Jerofke-Owen; Jennifer Dahlman
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 8.  Health literacy screening instruments for eHealth applications: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; Leanne M Currie; Suzanne Bakken; David K Vawdrey; Patricia W Stone
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 6.317

9.  An exploratory study of patient's feelings about asking healthcare professionals to wash their hands.

Authors:  C Duncan
Journal:  J Ren Care       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar

10.  Development and validation of an instrument to measure patient engagement in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

Authors:  Richard Huan Xu; Annie Wai-Ling Cheung; Eliza Lai-Yi Wong
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.711

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience.

Authors:  Nathalie Clavel; Jesseca Paquette; Vincent Dumez; Claudio Del Grande; Djahanchah Philip Sacha Ghadiri; Marie-Pascale Pomey; Louise Normandin
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.377

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.