| Literature DB >> 32883314 |
G Donisi1, G Capretti2,3, N Cortese4, A Rigamonti4,5, F Gavazzi1, G Nappo1, A Pulvirenti1, M Sollai6, P Spaggiari6, A Zerbi1,7, F Marchesi8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA) is a rare yet aggressive malignancy, with increasing incidence in the last decades. Its low frequency has hampered a thorough understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease and of its biology, limiting the identification of tailored therapeutic options. A large body of evidence has clearly shown the clinical relevance of immune cells in solid tumors, correlating immune features with post-surgical prognosis. The aim of this study was to analyze the immune contexture in a cohort of duodenal adenocarcinomas surgically resected at our Institution and define its correlation with clinical variables.Entities:
Keywords: Duodenal cancer; Prognosis; Tumor infiltrating cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32883314 PMCID: PMC7470614 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-020-02508-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Demographic and clinico-pathological characteristics of included patients and pathological tumor characteristics
| Patients and tumor characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Variable | Adenocarcinomas (n = 15) |
| Sexa | |
| Female | 3 (20%) |
| Male | 12 (80%) |
| Age at operationb | 73 (65–78) |
| Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIba | 5 (33%) |
| Post-operative mortalitya | 3 (20%) |
| DA on adenomaa | 3 (20%) |
| Portion of duodenum involveda | |
| I | 1 (7%) |
| II | 13 (86%) |
| III | 1 (7%) |
| IV | 0 (0%) |
| TNM staging 7th edition | |
| Ta | |
| 1–2 | 2 (13%) |
| 3–4 | 13 (87%) |
| Na | |
| 0 | 7 (47%) |
| 1 | 2 (13%) |
| 2 | 6 (40%) |
| Stage grouping 7th editiona | |
| I | 2 (13%) |
| II | 5 (34%) |
| III | 8 (53%) |
| Histological grade (G)a | |
| 1–2 | 7 (46%) |
| 3–4 | 8 (54%) |
| Resection status (R)a | |
| 0, n (%) | 14 (93%) |
| 1, n (%) | 1 (7%) |
| 2, n (%) | 0 (0%) |
| n° of retrieved lymph nodesb | 23 (14–28) |
| n° of positive lymph nodesb | 2 (0–3) |
| Lymph node ratiob | 0.689 (0–0.115) |
| Perineural invasiona | 5 (33%) |
| Lymphovascular invasiona | 5 (33%) |
| Adjuvant chemotherapya | 6 (40%) |
| Adjuvant radiotherapya | 0 (0%) |
| Disease recurrencea | 3 (20%) |
| Disease related deatha | 3 (20%) |
Only adenocarcinoma patients have been included. a n (%); b median (IQR)
Fig. 1Immunohistochemical evaluation of immune cells in human duodenal cancer. a Representative picture of a human duodenal adenocarcinoma specimen; the invasive front (orange arrow) and tumor core regions (black arrow) are indicated. b–h Representative pictures of CD45RO-TILs (b), CD8-TILs (c), IL17+ cells (d), PD1-TILs (e), CD20-TILs (f), CD68-TAM (h) at the invasive margin and CD20-TLT (g) in the tumor stroma. Scale bars = 500 μm (a), 200 μm (b–h). TILs: tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; TLT: tertiary lymphoid tissue; TAM: tumor-associated macrophages
Fig. 2Distribution of immune cells in duodenal cancer specimens. a Density (IRA%, percentage of immunoreactive area) of immune cells at the invasive margin (n = 18). b Correlation between density (IRA%) of CD45RO-TILs and IL17+ cells at the invasive margin (n = 18; r = 0.61; p = 0.007 by Spearman analysis). c Correlation between density (IRA %) of CD8-TILs and PD1-TILs at the invasive margin (n = 18; r = 0.53; p = 0.023 by Spearman analysis). d Comparison between density (IRA%) of CD45RO-TILs and CD8-TILs in the tumor core (TC) and at the invasive margin (IM) (n = 18; p = ns by Mann–Whitney). e, f Correlation between density of immune cell infiltration at invasive margin (IM) and tumor core (TC) of CD45RO-TILs (n = 18, r = 0.68; p = 0.002 by Spearman analysis) (e) and CD8-TILs (f) (n = 18, r = 0.64; p = 0.004 by Spearman analysis)
Fig. 3Distribution of immune populations according to histopathological features. a Immune cell density (IRA%) in DA (Duodenal Adenocarcinoma; n = 12); DA on Ad (Duodenal Adenocarcinoma progressed from Adenoma; n = 3) and Ad (Adenoma; n = 3). b Density of immune cells in duodenal cancer specimens according to histotype: NOS (Not Otherwise Specified; n = 7); MUC (Mucinous histotype; n = 5); INT (Intestinal histotype; n = 1); AD SQ (Adenosquamous histotype; n = 1). * p = 0.01 by Mann–Whitney
Spearman’s Rho correlation between immune cells and lymphnode invasion
| LNR | n° LN+ | |
|---|---|---|
| CD45RO mean %area | ||
| Correlation coefficient | − .452 | − .369 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .091 | .176 |
| CD8 mean % area | ||
| Correlation coefficient | − .625(*) | − .596(*) |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .013 | .019 |
| CD20 TIL mean %area | ||
| Correlation coefficient | − .136 | − .110 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .630 | .697 |
| CD20 TLT mean %area | ||
| Correlation coefficient | − .422 | − .340 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .117 | .215 |
| CD68 mean %area | ||
| Correlation coefficient | − .463 | − .361 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .082 | .186 |
| IL-17 mean %area | ||
| Correlation coefficient | − .429 | − .390 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .110 | .150 |
| PD-1 mean %area | ||
| Correlation coefficient | − .177 | − .125 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .528 | .657 |
*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)
LNR: Lymph node ratio. n° LN+ : number of metastatic lymph nodes
Fig. 4Correlation of immune cell density with clinical variables. a, left Density (IRA %) of CD8-TILs according to presence (N+ ; n = 8) or not (N0; n = 7) of metastatic lymphnodes (p = 0.093 by Mann–Whitney). a, right Density (IRA %) of CD8-TILs according to N stage (N0: no lymph nodes, n = 7; N1: 1 metastatic lymph node, n = 2; N2, more than 1 metastatic lymph node, n = 6; p = 0.064 by Kruskal–Wallis). b Density (IRA %) of CD8-TILs (left) in patients with recurrence (n = 3) and no recurrence (n = 9; p = 0.09 by Mann–Whitney) and density (IRA %) of CD68-TAMs (right) in patients with recurrence (n = 3) and no recurrence (n = 9; p = 0.036 by Mann–Whitney)