Literature DB >> 32882751

The minimum intensity of a mixed exposure that increases the risk of an outcome.

Ionut Bebu1, Barbara H Braffett2, John M Lachin1.   

Abstract

Semi-quantitative exposures, such as smoking and alcohol consumption, are common in clinical studies. Their association with outcomes is captured using either a single quantitative variable that includes nonexposed with a value of zero, or using two variables by adding an additional binary variable exposed versus not exposed. Herein, we propose two approaches to determine a lower bound on the amount of such an exposure (eg, number of cigarettes smoked per day) that significantly increases the risk of outcomes. Using smoking as illustration, the first approach consists of sequentially testing the effect of 1, 2, and so on, cigarettes per day, which requires an adjustment for multiplicity to protect the overall type-I error. An alternative gatekeeping approach is also described. The proposed methods are illustrated for the association of smoking with clinically confirmed neuropathy in a logistic regression model, and for the association of smoking with the risk of CVD in a Cox PH regression model.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gatekeeping procedures; modeling exposure; multiple testing; semi-quantitative covariate; smoking and smoking intensity

Year:  2020        PMID: 32882751      PMCID: PMC8150102          DOI: 10.1002/sim.8705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  6 in total

1.  Modeling smoking history: a comparison of different approaches.

Authors:  Karen Leffondré; Michal Abrahamowicz; Jack Siemiatycki; Bernard Rachet
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Centring in regression analyses: a strategy to prevent errors in statistical inference.

Authors:  Helena C Kraemer; Christine M Blasey
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Stepwise gatekeeping procedures in clinical trial applications.

Authors:  Alex Dmitrienko; Ajit C Tamhane; Xin Wang; Xun Chen
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.207

4.  Gatekeeping Strategies for Avoiding False-Positive Results in Clinical Trials With Many Comparisons.

Authors:  Kabir Yadav; Roger J Lewis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Models to Assess the Association of a Semiquantitative Exposure With Outcomes.

Authors:  John M Lachin; Ionut Bebu; Barbara Braffett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  The diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study at 30 years: overview.

Authors:  David M Nathan
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 19.112

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.