| Literature DB >> 32880685 |
Sabine Daemen1, Anne Gemmink1, Alexandra Paul2,3, Nils Billecke4, Katrina Rieger4, Sapun H Parekh5,6, Matthijs K C Hesselink7.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Intramyocellular lipid (IMCL) content associates with development of insulin resistance, albeit not in insulin-sensitive endurance-trained athletes (trained). Qualitative and spatial differences in muscle lipid composition may underlie this so-called athlete's paradox. Here we studied triacylglycerol (TAG) composition of individual myocellular lipid droplets (LDs) in trained individuals and individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Entities:
Keywords: Athlete’s paradox; CARS microscopy; Intramyocellular lipid storage; Lipid composition; Lipid droplet chemical composition; Lipid droplets; Type 2 diabetes
Year: 2020 PMID: 32880685 PMCID: PMC7641925 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-020-05266-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetologia ISSN: 0012-186X Impact factor: 10.122
Participant characteristics
| Variable | Trained | T2DM |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 26.0 ± 1.8 | 60.6 ± 2.0* |
| Body weight (kg) | 72.4 ± 2.6 | 95.9 ± 2.8* |
| % Fat mass | 13.4 ± 0.5 | 28.3 ± 0.9* |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.0 ± 0.6 | 29.6 ± 0.8* |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/l) | 5.1 ± 0.1 | 7.4 ± 0.5* |
| GIR (μmol [kg LBM]−1 min−1) | 93.8 ± 6.6 | 25.7 ± 5.3* |
| 71.0 ± 1.6 | 36.8 ± 1.5* | |
| IMCL (%) | 3.49 ± 0.69 | 2.48 ± 0.29 |
| Fasting insulin (pmol/l) | – | 107.7 ± 25.7 |
| HOMA-IR (%) | – | 5.5 ± 1.0 |
| Glucose-lowering medication (number of individuals) | Metformin ( | |
| DPP-4 inhibitor ( | ||
| Sulfonylurea ( |
Data are mean ± SEM, n = 8 for each group, except where shown otherwise
*p < 0.05 vs Trained
T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus
Fig. 1TAG chain length and saturation of LDs does not differ between trained and type 2 diabetic individuals. (a) Representative images of the integrated CH2 intensity (2840–2855 cm−1), revealing the LDs in type I and type II fibres of trained and type 2 diabetic (T2DM) individuals, with fibre borders indicated in white; scale bars, 20 μm. (b, c) Average CARS spectra of LDs of trained and type 2 diabetic individuals, showing fingerprint intensity and intensity in the CH region (2800–3100 cm−1), in type I (b) and type II (c) fibres (mean ± SD); the enlarged, framed peaks in (c) have been broadened to show differences and similarities more clearly. (d) Number of carbons per acyl chain and (e) number of double bonds per acyl chain (C=C number) within LDs for all fibres, type I fibres and type II fibres of trained and type 2 diabetic individuals (mean ± SD). n = 8 for each group
Fig. 2Saturation is higher in SS LDs. (a) CH2 intensity image (left) and spatial maps of chain length (middle) and C=C number (right) of a representative image of a trained participant, with magnified images below (indicated in the original image by a red box; note that the resolution of the zoomed images is the maximum possible, given the system used). Colour scales represent number of carbons per acyl chain (middle) or C=C number (right). In these images the SS region was identified by using an individual predetermined SS diameter (as illustrated by the blue area in the CH2 intensity image). Fibre borders are indicated in white and black; scale bars, 20 μm. (b, c) Acyl chain length (b) and C=C number (c) of SS and IMF LDs in all fibres, type I fibres and type II fibres of all participants; n = 16 (mean ± SD). (d) C=C number in LDs in type II fibres separated for trained and type 2 diabetic (T2DM) individuals; n = 8 for each group (mean ± SD). *p < 0.05 vs SS in the same group
Fig. 3Higher chain length in large LDs. (a) CH2 intensity image (left) and spatial maps of chain length (middle) and C=C number (right) of a representative image of a type 2 diabetic (T2DM) participant. Colour scales represent number of carbons per acyl chain (middle) or C=C number (right). Small LDs indicated by black arrows, large LDs indicated by grey arrows. Fibre borders are indicated in white and black; scale bars, 20 μm. (b, c) Acyl chain length (b) and C=C number (c) of small and large LDs in all fibres, type I fibres and type II fibres (mean ± SD) *p < 0.05 vs small LDs in the same group; n = 8 for large and small LDs