Literature DB >> 32880035

Reproductive decision-making in the context of hereditary cancer: the effects of an online decision aid on informed decision-making.

Kelly Reumkens1,2, Marly H E Tummers1,2, Yil Severijns3,4, Joyce J G Gietel-Habets1,2, Sander M J van Kuijk5, Cora M Aalfs6, Christi J van Asperen7, Margreet G E M Ausems8, Margriet Collée9, Charlotte J Dommering10, Marleen Kets11, Lizet E van der Kolk12, Jan C Oosterwijk13, Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen2,14, Trudy van der Weijden15, Christine E M de Die-Smulders1,2, Liesbeth A D M van Osch1,16.   

Abstract

Individuals having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners face challenging decisions regarding their wish to have children. This study aimed to determine the effects of an online decision aid to support couples in making an informed decision regarding their reproductive options. A nationwide pretest-posttest study was conducted in the Netherlands among 131 participants between November 2016 and May 2018. Couples were eligible for participation if one partner had a pathogenic variant predisposing for an autosomal dominant hereditary cancer syndrome. Participants completed a questionnaire before use (T0), and at 3 months (T3) after use of the decision aid to assess the primary outcome measure informed decision-making, and the secondary outcome measures decisional conflict, knowledge, realistic expectations, level of deliberation, and decision self-efficacy. T0-T3 comparisons show an overall positive effect for all outcome measures (all ps < 0.05; knowledge (ES = - 1.05), decisional conflict (ES = 0.99), participants' decision self-efficacy (ES = -0.55), level of deliberation (ES = - 0.50), and realistic expectations (ES = - 0.44). Informed decision-making increased over time and 58.0% of the participants made an informed reproductive decision at T3. The online decision aid seems to be an appropriate tool to complement standard reproductive counseling to support our target group in making an informed reproductive decision. Use of the decision aid may lessen the negative psychological impact of decision-making on couples' daily life and wellbeing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision aid; Hereditary cancer; Patient participation; Preimplantation genetic testing; Prenatal diagnosis

Year:  2020        PMID: 32880035     DOI: 10.1007/s12687-020-00484-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  3 in total

Review 1.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; France Légaré; Krystina Lewis; Michael J Barry; Carol L Bennett; Karen B Eden; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Anne Lyddiatt; Richard Thomson; Lyndal Trevena
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-12

2.  Validation of client decision-making instruments in the context of psychiatry.

Authors:  H Bunn; A O'Connor
Journal:  Can J Nurs Res       Date:  1996

3.  Awareness and attitude regarding reproductive options of persons carrying a BRCA mutation and their partners.

Authors:  J J G Gietel-Habets; C E M de Die-Smulders; I A P Derks-Smeets; A Tibben; V C G Tjan-Heijnen; R van Golde; E Gomez-Garcia; C M Kets; L A D M van Osch
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Impact of BRCA Status on Reproductive Decision-Making and Self-Concept: A Mixed-Methods Study Informing the Development of Tailored Interventions.

Authors:  Sharlene Hesse-Biber; Memnun Seven; Jing Jiang; Sara Van Schaik; Andrew A Dwyer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 6.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.