Literature DB >> 32879771

International Retinal Laser Society Guidelines For Subthreshold Laser Treatment.

Jan E E Keunen1, Maurizio Battaglia-Parodi2, Stela Vujosevic3, Jeffrey K Luttrull4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32879771      PMCID: PMC7443116          DOI: 10.1167/tvst.9.9.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol        ISSN: 2164-2591            Impact factor:   3.283


× No keyword cloud information.
The recent advent of new laser approaches has revolutionized the laser treatment techniques for retinal diseases. In particular, the goal of modern subthreshold laser (STL) treatment is now retinal preservation and normalization, rather than destruction.– Despite the proven effectiveness of STL, lack of standardization has limited its clinical application and usefulness.– The International Retinal Laser Society (LIGHT) would like to provide simple evidence-based treatment guidelines to optimize STL application for all users.

The Target

The target of treatment is the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). The therapeutic effects of retinal laser are the result of RPE cell hyperthermia caused by laser absorption in RPE melanosomes.–

Low-Intensity Treatment

All therapeutic effects of STL arise from RPE cells affected, but not killed, by laser exposure, through thermal activation and enhanced function of intra-RPE heat-shock proteins (HSPs).–, As an enzymatic threshold phenomenon, the response at the cellular level is switch-like; “on/off,” all-or-nothing, rather than graduated. Treatment intensities exceeding the HSP activation threshold increase the risk of retinal damage but do not improve therapeutic effects. Designed to respond to acute existential threats, HSP activation is catalytic; initiating reparative cascades within the cell, locally, and systemically to normalize function.–, The therapeutic range (TR) is the zone wherein treatment is therapeutically effective and safe, sublethal to the retina. The breadth of the TR, and thus likelihood of clinical treatment safety, varies markedly depending on laser mode and parameters., The TR is broadened and safety maximized by use of longer wavelengths, longer pulse durations, and low-frequency pulse trains,, (Table).
Table.

Example Treatment Parameters for Various Laser Modes and Settings and Effects on Therapeutic (Clinical Safety) Ranges

LaserWavelengthRetinalPowerDutySpot DurationTherapeutic
Mode(nm)Spot (um)(Watts)Cycle (%)(Seconds)Rangeg (Watts)
Nanoa532400∼24(mJ)dCW3 × 10−90
Microb532100∼ 0.117dCW0.000020.010
MP8 c,e5771050.25050.200.29
MP6 c,e8102101.450.154h
MP c,e,f8105251.750.3015h

aNanosecond continuous wave (CW).

bMicrosecond CW.

cMicropulsed.

dEstimate, by titration.

eFixed, published.

fFixed, currently preferred; used in over 20,000 consecutive panmacular treatments (Luttrull, unpublished data 2020).

gCalculated difference between the laser power at given laser parameters required for reaching the activation threshold of 1.0 for the Arrhenius integrals of the therapeutic reset effect (lower limit of TR) and the 50/50 risk of thermal cell death (upper limit of TR).

hNote that the TR of these 810nm laser parameters exceed the maximum available power of current retinal lasers allowing use in all eyes of all patients for all indications, safely and effectively.

Example Treatment Parameters for Various Laser Modes and Settings and Effects on Therapeutic (Clinical Safety) Ranges aNanosecond continuous wave (CW). bMicrosecond CW. cMicropulsed. dEstimate, by titration. eFixed, published. fFixed, currently preferred; used in over 20,000 consecutive panmacular treatments (Luttrull, unpublished data 2020). gCalculated difference between the laser power at given laser parameters required for reaching the activation threshold of 1.0 for the Arrhenius integrals of the therapeutic reset effect (lower limit of TR) and the 50/50 risk of thermal cell death (upper limit of TR). hNote that the TR of these 810nm laser parameters exceed the maximum available power of current retinal lasers allowing use in all eyes of all patients for all indications, safely and effectively.

High-density Treatment

Normalization of RPE function at the cellular level requires amplification to achieve and maximize therapeutic clinical effects. This is accomplished by confluent treatment of broad areas of dysfunctional retina to recruit and normalize the RPE en masse. The most common error with modern retinal laser therapy is undertreatment; characterized by too few spot applications, of insufficient density, over too small areas –

Titration?

Titration of laser treatment intensity is an idea rooted in the photocoagulation era, which used immediately visible physical, rather than invisible physiologic, endpoints. Titration is discouraged by LIGHT because it increases the likelihood of unintended retinal damage., Instead, LIGHT recommends use of published “fixed” laser parameters (identical settings in all eyes) shown to be reliably safe and effective (Table).

Technique

Bearing in mind the action of STL is mediated through the RPE, an extensive RPE area must be treated to maximize clinical outcomes. Thus traditional targeted focal and local treatment is discouraged. For most applications, we consider panmacular treatment the optimal approach. In panmacular treatment, the entire retina between the vascular arcades is “painted” with confluent laser spots, several times over in a single treatment session, to ensure complete coverage and avoid undertreatment. The number of laser spots required depends on the spot size. For example, panmacular treatment with a 125-μm spot may require 2000 shots, whereas a 500-μm spot requires only 400 to 450. STL can be used like a drug to treat the entire retina, repeated as necessary, and used in conjunction with surgery or drugs to maximize management options and treatment outcomes.
  10 in total

1.  Re: van Dijk et al.: Half-dose photodynamic therapy versus high-density subthreshold micropulse laser treatment in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: the PLACE trial (Ophthalmology. 2018;125:1547-1555).

Authors:  Maurizio Battaglia Parodi; Pierluigi Iacono
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  The subthreshold micropulse laser treatment of the retina restores the oxidant/antioxidant balance and counteracts programmed forms of cell death in the mice eyes.

Authors:  Stefano De Cillà; Diego Vezzola; Serena Farruggio; Stela Vujosevic; Nausicaa Clemente; Giulia Raina; David Mary; Giamberto Casini; Luca Rossetti; Laura Avagliano; Carla Martinelli; Gaetano Bulfamante; Elena Grossini
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 3.761

3.  Reply to Comment on: Focal and Diffuse Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy Treated With Half-Dose Photodynamic Therapy or Subthreshold Micropulse Laser: PLACE Trial Report No. 3.

Authors:  Thomas J van Rijssen; Elon H C van Dijk; Paula Scholz; Myrte B Breukink; Rocio Blanco-Garavito; Eric H Souied; Jan E E Keunen; Robert E MacLaren; Giuseppe Querques; Sascha Fauser; Susan M Downes; Carel B Hoyng; Camiel J F Boon
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Subthreshold grid laser treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion with micropulse infrared (810 nanometer) diode laser.

Authors:  Maurizio Battaglia Parodi; Sonela Spasse; Pierluigi Iacono; Giuseppe Di Stefano; Tiziana Canziani; Giuseppe Ravalico
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Long-term safety, high-resolution imaging, and tissue temperature modeling of subvisible diode micropulse photocoagulation for retinovascular macular edema.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Luttrull; Christopher Sramek; Daniel Palanker; Charles J Spink; David C Musch
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  SUBTHRESHOLD MICROPULSE YELLOW LASER VERSUS SUBTHRESHOLD MICROPULSE INFRARED LASER IN CENTER-INVOLVING DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: Morphologic and Functional Safety.

Authors:  Stela Vujosevic; Ferdinando Martini; Evelyn Longhin; Enrica Convento; Fabiano Cavarzeran; Edoardo Midena
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 7.  Subthreshold and micropulse diode laser photocoagulation.

Authors:  Giorgio Dorin
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.975

8.  Functionally Guided Retinal Protective Therapy for Dry Age-Related Macular and Inherited Retinal Degenerations: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Luttrull; Benjamin W L Margolis
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Comparison of Subthreshold 577 and 810 nm Micropulse Laser Effects on Heat-Shock Protein Activation Kinetics: Implications for Treatment Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  David B Chang; Jeffrey K Luttrull
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 10.  Subthreshold diode micropulse laser photocoagulation (SDM) as invisible retinal phototherapy for diabetic macular edema: a review.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Luttrull; Giorgio Dorin
Journal:  Curr Diabetes Rev       Date:  2012-07-01
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Real World Data Comparison of Standard Care vs SDM Laser Vision Protection Therapy for Prevention of Neovascular AMD.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Luttrull; Gerry Gray
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-24

2.  Subthreshold micropulse laser adjuvant to bevacizumab versus bevacizumab monotherapy in treating diabetic macular edema: one- year- follow-up.

Authors:  Leila El Matri; Ahmed Chebil; Khaled El Matri; Yousra Falfoul; Zouheir Chebbi
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.