Literature DB >> 32879692

Review of Junior Resident Plain Film Reporting and Audit in Singapore.

Alexander Sheng Ming Tan, Shaun Xavier Ju Min Chan, David Soon Yiew Sia, Daniel En Shen Wong, Winston Eng Hoe Lim, Andrew Gee Seng Tan, Bien Soo Tan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Graduate medical education in Singapore recently underwent significant restructuring, leading to the accreditation of residency programs by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-International (ACGME-I). In radiology, this involved a change in teaching and quality assurance of plain film (PF) reporting. PF reported by junior residents (postgraduate year 1-3) are subject to a 50% random audit. To date, national data on junior resident performance in PF reporting have not been published.
OBJECTIVE: We reviewed performance in PF reporting under the current teaching and audit framework.
METHODS: Retrospective review of junior resident reported PF audit data from all 3 radiology residency programs in Singapore. The number of residents audited, number of PF reported and audited, and major discrepancy rates were analyzed.
RESULTS: On average, 86 440 PF were audited annually nationwide from an estimated 184 288 junior resident-reported PF. Each program trained between 4 to 24 junior residents annually (mean 15), averaging about 44 each year nationwide. A mean of 28 813 PF were audited annually in each program (range 4355-50 880). An estimated mean of 4148 PF (range 1452-9752) were reported per junior resident per year, about 346 PF per month. The major discrepancy rate ranged from 0.04% to 1.13% (mean 0.34%). One resident required remediation in the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: Structured residency training in Singapore has produced a high level of junior resident competency in PF interpretation. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education 2020.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32879692      PMCID: PMC7450738          DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00678.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Grad Med Educ        ISSN: 1949-8357


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology.

Authors:  Cindy S Lee; Paul G Nagy; Sallie J Weaver; David E Newman-Toker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Identifying benchmarks for discrepancy rates in preliminary interpretations provided by radiology trainees at an academic institution.

Authors:  Alexander T Ruutiainen; Mary H Scanlon; Jason N Itri
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Radiology resident preliminary reporting in an independent call environment: multiyear assessment of volume, timeliness, and accuracy.

Authors:  Brent D Weinberg; Michael D Richter; Julie G Champine; M Craig Morriss; Travis Browning
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  The Fellowship of the Royal College of Radiologists (FRCR) examination: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  T C Booth; R deP M Martins; L McKnight; K Courtney; R Malliwal
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 5.  Error and discrepancy in radiology: inevitable or avoidable?

Authors:  Adrian P Brady
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-12-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.