| Literature DB >> 32879653 |
Ahmad Khusairi Azemi1, Siti Safiah Mokhtar1, Aida Hanum Ghulam Rasool1,2.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is associated with endothelial dysfunction; it causes progressive vascular damage resulting from an impaired endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation. In the diabetes state, presence of hyperglycemia and insulin resistance predisposes to endothelial dysfunction. Clinacanthus nutans, widely used as a traditional medicine for diabetes is reported to have hypoglycemic, hypolipidemic, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties. However, the possibility of C. nutans affecting the vascular endothelial function in diabetes remains unclear. This study was aimed at evaluating the effects of C. nutans methanolic leaves extract (CNME) on endothelial function in a type 2 diabetes (T2DM) rat model. Sixty male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into five groups (n = 12 per group): nondiabetic control, nondiabetic treated with four weeks of CNME (500 mg/kg/daily), untreated diabetic rats, diabetic treated with metformin (300 mg/kg/daily), and diabetic treated with CNME (500 mg/kg/daily). T2DM was induced by a single intraperitoneal injection of low-dose streptozotocin (STZ) to rats fed with high-fat diet (HFD). Endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent relaxations and contractions of the thoracic aorta were determined using the organ bath. Aortic endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression was determined using Western blotting. Endothelial-dependent relaxation was reduced in diabetic rats. Both diabetic groups treated with CNME or metformin significantly improved the impairment in endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation; this was associated with increased expression of aortic eNOS protein. CNME- and metformin-treated groups also reduced aortic endothelium-dependent and aortic endothelium-independent contractions in diabetics. Both of these diabetic-treated groups also reduced blood glucose levels and increased body weight compared to the untreated diabetic group. In conclusion, C. nutans improves endothelial-dependent vasodilatation and reduces endothelial-dependent contraction, thus ameliorating endothelial dysfunction in diabetic rats. This may occur due to its effect on increasing eNOS protein expression.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32879653 PMCID: PMC7448219 DOI: 10.1155/2020/7572892
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1Phytoconstituents from CNME detected using GC-MS with relative time.
Phytoconstituents identified in the CNME by GC-MS.
| Peak | Name of the compound | Peak area (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,3-Propanediamine, N,N-dimethyl | 1.47 |
| 2 | 6-Methyluracil | 1.96 |
| 3 | 4H-Pyran-4-one, 2-3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl | 2.20 |
| 4 | Coumaran/benzofuran,2,3-dihyro- | 2.31 |
| 5 | 5-Hydroxylmethylfurfural | 3.10 |
| 6 | 3-Methoxymethcathinone | 1.09 |
| 7 | Pyridine, 2,5-dimethyl- | 1.43 |
| 8 | 7-Azaindole-3-carboaldehyde | 2.93 |
| 9 | Lethane | 4.92 |
| 10 | Lethane | 4.34 |
| 11 | 3-Deoxy-d-mannoic acid | 2.13 |
| 12 | Neophytadiene | 0.76 |
| 13 | Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 0.56 |
| 14 | 9H-Pyridol[3,4-]indole, b-carboline | 1.20 |
| 15 | 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester | 1.02 |
| 16 | Phytol | 2.65 |
| 17 | Hexadecanamide | 0.61 |
| 18 | 9-Octadecenamide | 0.71 |
| 19 | Octadecanamide | 0.78 |
| 20 | Squalene | 1.18 |
| 21 | Beta-tocopherol, vitamin E | 0.26 |
| 22 | Alpha-tocopherol, vitamin E | 1.91 |
| 23 | Stigmasterol | 1.20 |
| 24 | Beta-sitosterol | 1.57 |
Body weight and FBG changes in nondiabetic and HFD-fed diabetic rats.
| C | C+CNME | DM | DM+Met | DM+CNME | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (g) (week 0) | 308.30 ± 10.57 | 292.50 ± 14.16 | 319.60 ± 10.13 | 313.80 ± 12.82 | 307.20 ± 9.54 |
| Final body weight (g) (after treatment, week 15th) | 409.30 ± 17.12$$$$ | 409.90 ± 16.33$$$$ | 260.50 ± 7.09$,#### | 321.60 ± 12.53###,∗ | 330.90 ± 13.69##,∗ |
| FBG (mmol/L) (after treatment) | 4.82 ± 0.20 | 4.78 ± 0.29 | 28.16 ± 0.85#### | 18.33 ± 0.91####,∗∗∗∗ | 19.52 ± 0.54####,∗∗∗∗ |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 12). $P < 0.05 and $$$$P < 0.0001, final body weight versus initial body weight within the same group. ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, and ####P < 0.0001 vs. C. ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001 vs. DM.
Figure 2Endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent relaxations in the thoracic aorta of rats: (a) concentration response curves to ACh (10−9 -10−4 M); (b) concentration response curves to SNP (10−9 -10−4 M). Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 12). Relaxations were expressed as a percentage of the contraction induced by PE (10−6 M). ####P < 0.0001 vs. C. ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001 vs. DM.
Relaxations to ACh and SNP in thoracic aortas.
| C | C+CNME | DM | DM+Met | DM+CNME | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acetylcholine (ACh) | |||||
| | 90.14 ± 1.37 | 88.74 ± 2.13 | 57.82 ± 2.62#### | 84.06 ± 1.98∗∗∗∗ | 83.87 ± 1.27∗∗∗∗ |
| Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) | |||||
| | 108.90 ± 4.63 | 112.40 ± 4.99 | 124.00 ± 8.30 | 114.40 ± 4.18 | 115.40 ± 6.89 |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 12). ####P < 0.0001 vs. C. ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001 vs. DM.
Figure 3Endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent contractions in the thoracic aorta of rats: (a) concentration response curves to calcium ionophore A23187 (10−9 -10−5 M); (b) concentration response curves to PE (10−9 -10−4 M). Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 12). Relaxations were expressed as a percentage of the contraction induced by PE (10−6 M). #P < 0.05 vs. C. ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. DM.
Contractions to calcium ionophore A23187 and PE in thoracic aortas.
| C | C+CNME | DM | DM+Met | DM+CNME | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium ionophore A23187 | |||||
| | 48.30 ± 3.54 | 44.14 ± 4.82 | 69.61 ± 5.55# | 44.54 ± 4.94∗ | 41.63 ± 5.11∗∗ |
| Phenylephrine (PE) | |||||
| | 105.60 ± 6.47 | 103.50 ± 7.21 | 140.00 ± 9.07# | 101.80 ± 6.06∗∗ | 98.06 ± 6.73∗∗ |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 12). #P < 0.05 vs. C. ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. DM.
Figure 4Western blot analysis of eNOS protein expression in the thoracic aorta: (a) representative Western blots showing the expression of eNOS protein of C, C+CNME, DM, DM+Met, and DM+CNME groups; (b) graphical representation of the data, normalized to β-actin. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 12). ####P < 0.0001 vs. C. ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. DM.