Literature DB >> 32879427

The Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in COVID-19.

Alessandro Gozzetti1, Enrico Capochiani2, Monica Bocchia3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32879427      PMCID: PMC7467142          DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-01038-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


× No keyword cloud information.
With great interest, we had the opportunity to read the paper by La Rosée F et al. [1] in which between March 30th and April 15th, 2020, using a newly developed COVID-19 Inflammation Score (CIS), patients were prospectively stratified for targeted inhibition of cytokine signaling by the Janus Kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib (Rux). Fourteen patients were treated up to 14 days with Rux at 7.5 mg per day (at an intermediate dose between GvHD, 5 mg bid, and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, 15 mg bid) with a CIS ≥ 10 out of 16 points. The authors reported that 12/14 patients achieved significant reduction of CIS by ≥25% on day 7 with a sustained clinical improvement in 11/14 patients. We would like to report our results in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) while employing a different Rux schedule at higher doses than those reported by La Rosée. The Ruxolitinib for the treatment of ARDS (RESPIRE, NCT04361903) study was approved by the National Ethics Committee. For each patient treated with Rux, parameters of inflammation and organ function were measured before treatment and again every 12, 24, or 48 h. Between March 10th and April 7th we treated 18 hospitalized patients (12 males/6 females; median age 62.5 years, range 28–86) with Rux 20 mg bid for the first 48 h and subsequent two-step de-escalation at 10 mg bids and 5 mg bids for a maximum of 14 days of treatment. Major endpoint of the treatment was to avoid respiratory worsening and progression to mechanical ventilation. Main inflammatory laboratory findings at baseline were: Fibrinogen (g/L) 4.4 (2.1–21.6) Ferritin (ng/mL) 841 (321–3348) CRP (mg/L) 17.8 (4–82) PCT (ng/ml) 0.6 (0.1–3.3) LDH (IU/L) 301 (189–506) ALT (U/L) 55 (34–213) D-Dimer (ng/mL) 747 (202–1724) TNF-alpha (pg/ml) 2.2 (1–10.6) MCP-1 (pg/ml) 524 (152–1471) IL-6 (pg/ml) 24.5 (4.5–111). The median time from the onset of COVID-19-related symptoms and to the beginning of Rux therapy was 9 days (range 4–15). Fourteen out of 18 patients had parameters evaluable for CIS, 12/14 had CIS > 10. All 18 patients started Rux treatment on progressive ARDS, showing a median PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 159 (range 106–208) on noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and they were in imminent need to proceed to mechanical ventilation in accordance with the guidelines of our ICUs. Overall, after the introduction of Rux no evolution from NIV to mechanical ventilation was seen in 16/18 patients and no response in two patients. Interestingly, the CIS in these two patients was 14 and 8. Sixteen out of 18 patients showed a significant improvement in respiratory response already in the first 48 h. After 7 days of Rux treatment, 11/18 patients showed fully recovered respiratory function (pO2 > 98% in spontaneous breathing), 4/18 patients had minimal oxygen requirement (2–4 L/min) 1/18 patients showed stable disease, and 2/18 patients showed progressive disease. At day 14 of Rux treatment, 16/18 patients showed complete respiratory function. No patient died. Our results confirm the efficacy of Rux in reducing severe respiratory distress. Rux is a potent and selective inhibitor of JAK 1 and 2, with selectivity against tyrosine kinase (TYK)2 and JAK3, resulting in a powerful anti-inflammatory activity. We decided to delay mechanical ventilation in favor of Rux treatment with the assumption that in unselected COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure this drug could reduce the hyperinflammatory status causing ARDS, thus potentially lower intubation rates and ultimately improve patient outcome. Differently from the study of La Rosée et al., we used higher doses of Rux, with the intent to achieve a rapid and clinically evident response, given the severity of the patients treated. Larger studies are warranted in order to assess the best dosage and timing while using this powerful drug. As shown by our efforts, the use of Rux has proven to be quite promising with this short-term high dose schedule, in rapidly improving COVID-19-related severe ARDS.
  1 in total

1.  The Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in COVID-19 with severe systemic hyperinflammation.

Authors:  F La Rosée; H C Bremer; I Gehrke; A Kehr; A Hochhaus; S Birndt; M Fellhauer; M Henkes; B Kumle; S G Russo; P La Rosée
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 11.528

  1 in total
  13 in total

1.  JAK-inhibitors for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chong-Xiang Chen; Jiao-Jiao Wang; Huan Li; Le-Tao Yuan; Robert Peter Gale; Yang Liang
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 2.  Critical Determinants of Cytokine Storm and Type I Interferon Response in COVID-19 Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Santhamani Ramasamy; Selvakumar Subbian
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  TextEssence: A Tool for Interactive Analysis of Semantic Shifts Between Corpora.

Authors:  Denis Newman-Griffis; Venkatesh Sivaraman; Adam Perer; Eric Fosler-Lussier; Harry Hochheiser
Journal:  Proc Conf       Date:  2021-06

Review 4.  COVID-19: Before the Fall, An Evidence-Based Narrative Review of Treatment Options.

Authors:  Nicholas Rebold; Dana Holger; Sara Alosaimy; Taylor Morrisette; Michael Rybak
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2021-01-25

5.  COVID-19: High-JAKing of the Inflammatory "Flight" by Ruxolitinib to Avoid the Cytokine Storm.

Authors:  Cirino Botta; Alessia Indrieri; Eugenio Garofalo; Flavia Biamonte; Andrea Bruni; Pino Pasqua; Francesco Cesario; Francesco Saverio Costanzo; Federico Longhini; Francesco Mendicino
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  Cytokines and Chemokines in SARS-CoV-2 Infections-Therapeutic Strategies Targeting Cytokine Storm.

Authors:  Alexandra Pum; Maria Ennemoser; Tiziana Adage; Andreas J Kungl
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-01-12

Review 7.  Aging, Immunity, and COVID-19: How Age Influences the Host Immune Response to Coronavirus Infections?

Authors:  Varnica Bajaj; Nirupa Gadi; Allison P Spihlman; Samantha C Wu; Christopher H Choi; Vaishali R Moulton
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 8.  COVID-19 as a mediator of interferon deficiency and hyperinflammation: Rationale for the use of JAK1/2 inhibitors in combination with interferon.

Authors:  H C Hasselbalch; V Skov; L Kjær; C Ellervik; A Poulsen; T D Poulsen; C H Nielsen
Journal:  Cytokine Growth Factor Rev       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 7.638

Review 9.  COVID-19 vaccines: The status and perspectives in delivery points of view.

Authors:  Jee Young Chung; Melissa N Thone; Young Jik Kwon
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 17.873

Review 10.  Potential therapeutic and pharmacological strategies for SARS-CoV2.

Authors:  Doaa A Ghareeb; Samar R Saleh; Mohammed S Nofal; Mohamed M Y Kaddah; Salma F Hassan; Inas K Seif; Sally A El-Zahaby; Shaimaa M Khedr; Marwa Y Kenawy; Aliaa A Masoud; Salma A Soudi; Ahmed A Sobhy; Jaillan G Sery; Miral G Abd El-Wahab; Alshimaa A Abd Elmoneam; Abdulaziz Mohsen Al-Mahallawi; Maha A El-Demellawy
Journal:  J Pharm Investig       Date:  2021-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.