Literature DB >> 32878998

Ataxin-1 regulates B cell function and the severity of autoimmune experimental encephalomyelitis.

Alessandro Didonna1, Ester Canto Puig2, Qin Ma2, Atsuko Matsunaga2, Brenda Ho2, Stacy J Caillier2, Hengameh Shams2, Nicholas Lee2, Stephen L Hauser2, Qiumin Tan3, Scott S Zamvil2,4, Jorge R Oksenberg2.   

Abstract

Ataxin-1 (ATXN1) is a ubiquitous polyglutamine protein expressed primarily in the nucleus where it binds chromatin and functions as a transcriptional repressor. Mutant forms of ataxin-1 containing expanded glutamine stretches cause the movement disorder spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 (SCA1) through a toxic gain-of-function mechanism in the cerebellum. Conversely, ATXN1 loss-of-function is implicated in cancer development and Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis. ATXN1 was recently nominated as a susceptibility locus for multiple sclerosis (MS). Here, we show that Atxn1-null mice develop a more severe experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) course compared to wildtype mice. The aggravated phenotype is mediated by increased T helper type 1 (Th1) cell polarization, which in turn results from the dysregulation of B cell activity. Ataxin-1 ablation in B cells leads to aberrant expression of key costimulatory molecules involved in proinflammatory T cell differentiation, including cluster of differentiation (CD)44 and CD80. In addition, comprehensive phosphoflow cytometry and transcriptional profiling link the exaggerated proliferation of ataxin-1 deficient B cells to the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways. Lastly, selective deletion of the physiological binding partner capicua (CIC) demonstrates the importance of ATXN1 native interactions for correct B cell functioning. Altogether, we report a immunomodulatory role for ataxin-1 and provide a functional description of the ATXN1 locus genetic association with MS risk.
Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B cells; antigen presentation; ataxin-1; autoimmunity; multiple sclerosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32878998      PMCID: PMC7519225          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2003798117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


The discovery of the ATXN1 gene and the subsequent molecular characterization of its protein product ataxin-1 have taken place mostly in the context of spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 (SCA1) (1). Ataxin-1 contains an unstable polyglutamine (polyQ) domain, which can undergo pathological expansion and cause the selective neurodegeneration of cerebellar Purkinje cells—the principal site of SCA1 pathology—resulting in progressive motor incoordination. Mutant ataxin-1 escapes the standard cellular systems of protein degradation and accumulates within the nuclear compartment of neuronal cells, where it exerts its pathogenic activity through a toxic gain-of-function mechanism (2). Ataxin-1 is able to bind chromatin and interacts with a number of known transcriptional repressors, indicating a role in the regulation of gene expression (3). However, the full spectrum of ataxin-1 functions is far from being fully described. Mice lacking ataxin-1 are viable, fertile, and do not show any evidence of ataxia or neurodegeneration. Notwithstanding the lack of gross phenotypes, Atxn1-null mice display decreased exploratory behavior and impaired performance on the rotarod apparatus and water maze test (4). A body of experimental evidence also supports a role for ataxin-1 in neurodevelopment, adult neurogenesis, and extracellular matrix remodeling (5–7). In addition, ataxin-1 controls cell proliferation and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of cancer cells (8). More recently, ataxin-1 loss-of-function was shown to elevate beta secretase 1 (BACE1) expression and aggravate Aβ pathology, proposing ataxin-1 as a potential contributor to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk (9). Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disorder of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by focal lymphocyte infiltration, breakdown of myelin sheaths, proliferation of astrocytes, and axonal degeneration. Although the primary etiology remains unknown, the interplay between genetic and environmental factors is believed to initiate MS pathogenesis (10). In a recent large-scale genomic effort, the locus containing the ATXN1 gene was found associated with MS susceptibility (11). Here, we build on this discovery to characterize the role of ataxin-1 in the context of CNS autoimmunity. By employing the MS model experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in Atxn1-null mice, we show that ataxin-1 exerts a B cell-mediated protective effect on autoimmune demyelination, enabled by native interactions with the transcriptional repressor capicua (CIC).

Results

Ataxin-1 Exerts a Protective Activity on Autoimmune Demyelination.

The known genetic contributions to MS risk consist of 232 autosomal risk variants (11). This map includes a region in chromosome 6p22.3 (position 16672769 in hg19), in which the marker rs719316 in the third intron of the ATXN1 gene represents the strongest association (P = 1.62 × 10−13, odds ratio (OR) = 1.072) in both fixed- and random-effects models (Fig. 1). Subsequent analysis in African Americans possibly refined the association, with the top single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs932411 mapping within the seventh intron of ATXN1 (P = 0.0022) (12).
Fig. 1.

Ataxin-1 exerts a protective effect on autoimmune demyelination. (A) The association P values derived from meta-analysis of all reported MS case–control studies in European ancestry populations for the SNPs at 6p22 locus are plotted. X-axis displays genomic positions based on hg19 and y-axis shows −log10 (P value). Top SNP (rs719316) is shown in purple and locates to the third intron of ATXN1 gene. The other SNPs are colored by the strength of linkage disequilibrium (LD) (r) with the top SNP. (B) Analysis of the predicted regulatory effect (PRE) of rs719316 in the ATXN1 locus. In the heatmap, each column represents a different cell type while each row represents a gene. The colors indicate positive (red), neutral (white) or negative (blue) PRE values. C = CNS, B = B cells, M = monocytes, T = T cells, O = others. (C) EAE induction in Atxn1 mice results in exacerbated disease course in comparison to controls. Heterozygous animals show instead a phenotype in between the homozygous animals (n = 19 knockout mice, n = 20 heterozygous mice, n = 38 wildtype mice). (D) A similar gene-dose effect is observed in mortality rates at EAE end point (30 dpi). (E and F) EAE induction in SCA1 knock-in mice (Atxn1) results in similar severity and mortality as compared to controls. The only exception is represented by the days 22 to 23 dpi where knock-in mice show increased scores as compared to controls (n = 23 knock-in mice, n = 21 wildtype mice). Differences between scores in each day were assessed by two-tailed Student’s t test while differences in mortality rates were assessed by Fisher’s exact test. * (knockout vs. wildtype) or (knock-in vs. wildtype); #, +, and ° (heterozygous vs. wildtype). * or #P ≤ 0.05, ** or +P ≤ 0.01, *** or ° P ≤ 0.001.

Ataxin-1 exerts a protective effect on autoimmune demyelination. (A) The association P values derived from meta-analysis of all reported MS case–control studies in European ancestry populations for the SNPs at 6p22 locus are plotted. X-axis displays genomic positions based on hg19 and y-axis shows −log10 (P value). Top SNP (rs719316) is shown in purple and locates to the third intron of ATXN1 gene. The other SNPs are colored by the strength of linkage disequilibrium (LD) (r) with the top SNP. (B) Analysis of the predicted regulatory effect (PRE) of rs719316 in the ATXN1 locus. In the heatmap, each column represents a different cell type while each row represents a gene. The colors indicate positive (red), neutral (white) or negative (blue) PRE values. C = CNS, B = B cells, M = monocytes, T = T cells, O = others. (C) EAE induction in Atxn1 mice results in exacerbated disease course in comparison to controls. Heterozygous animals show instead a phenotype in between the homozygous animals (n = 19 knockout mice, n = 20 heterozygous mice, n = 38 wildtype mice). (D) A similar gene-dose effect is observed in mortality rates at EAE end point (30 dpi). (E and F) EAE induction in SCA1 knock-in mice (Atxn1) results in similar severity and mortality as compared to controls. The only exception is represented by the days 22 to 23 dpi where knock-in mice show increased scores as compared to controls (n = 23 knock-in mice, n = 21 wildtype mice). Differences between scores in each day were assessed by two-tailed Student’s t test while differences in mortality rates were assessed by Fisher’s exact test. * (knockout vs. wildtype) or (knock-in vs. wildtype); #, +, and ° (heterozygous vs. wildtype). * or #P ≤ 0.05, ** or +P ≤ 0.01, *** or ° P ≤ 0.001. However, seven genes map to the ATXN1 locus, each one representing a potential candidate that could explain the association with MS susceptibility. To discern among them, we applied a recently developed in silico approach, computing the regulatory potential of rs719316 to all of the neighboring genes in the extended haplotype block in the context of cell-specific protein networks (13). ATXN1 showed the highest scores in all of the cell types analyzed (Fig. 1), adding support to consider ATXN1 as the most plausible disease risk gene within the locus. Concurrently, expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis in both brain and immune tissues [Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Portal] excluded long-range effects targeting genes outside the locus. Therefore, we decided to functionally validate this prediction in vivo exploring the role of ATXN1 in EAE, a murine disease that recapitulates several clinical, immunological, and histopathological features of MS (14). We generated Atxn1 knockout (Atxn1), heterozygous (Atxn1), and wildtype (Atxn1) mice on a pure C57BL/6J background (), and we immunized 8 to 10 wk female mice of each genotype with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) peptide 35 to 55 (MOG35–55). Atxn1 knockout mice exhibited significant greater disease severity and higher mortality rates as compared to wildtype littermates (Fig. 1 ). Heterozygous animals showed a disease profile intermediate between the knockout and wildtype mice, suggesting an Atxn1 gene dosage effect on EAE progression. Ataxin-1 deficiency did not affect disease onset. We then tested whether the protective function of ataxin-1 was dependent upon its polyglutamine domain. No significant differences were found in the disease course of knock-in animals bearing an Atxn1 gene containing 154 cytosine-adenine-guanine (CAG) repeats (Atxn1) and wildtype controls (Atxn1) (), except for a short time window (22 to 23 dpi) (Fig. 1 ). Interestingly, the EAE profile of knock-in mice resembles EAE in Atxn1 animals. As expanded ataxin-1 forms insoluble aggregates within the nucleus, Atxn1 mice may function as partial knockout models for ataxin-1 physiological activity.

Ataxin-1 Regulates Th1 Differentiation.

Ataxin-1 is expressed ubiquitously (15). Consequently, the exacerbated EAE course in constitutive knockout animals may be the result of ataxin-1 deficiency in multiple cells and tissues. In wildtype mice, the levels of Atxn1 transcript and those of a splicing isoform are up-regulated in splenocytes at the EAE peak (Fig. 2), pointing out at a possible regulatory function of ataxin-1 in the immune system. To specifically address this hypothesis, we carried out adoptive transfer experiments in which splenocytes from MOG peptide-primed knockout animals were injected into wildtype recipients. Consistent with the active EAE experiments, mice that received Atxn1 cells developed more severe clinical and histopathological EAE phenotypes as compared to control animals injected with wildtype cells (Fig. 2 and ), confirming that ataxin-1 ablation in the immune system is sufficient per se to drive the aggravated disease. In agreement, a higher percentage of T helper type 1 (Th1) cells was measured in knockout splenocytes. In contrast, there were no significant changes in the frequencies of Th17 and regulatory T cells (Treg) populations between the two genotypes (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.

Ataxin-1 regulates the immune response. (A) All Atxn1 variants are up-regulated in spleens of EAE mice (20 dpi) as compared to controls (n = 3 mice per group). (B) Adoptive transfer of Atxn1 splenocytes drives a more severe passive EAE as compared to Atxn1 cells (n = 18 knockout mice, n = 17 wildtype mice). (C) A higher percentage of Th1 cells was measured in Atxn1 splenocytes from MOG peptide-primed mice restimulated in vitro (n = 5 mice per group). (D) Similar percentages of Th1, Th17, and Treg cells were measured for both genotypes in pure cultures of naïve CD4+ T cells (n = 6 mice per group). (E) Surface levels of CD44 and CD80 were assessed in naïve splenocytes. In the heatmap, each column represents the mean of all mice in the group for each cytotype and each row the levels of a specific marker. The levels of both markers are increased in knockout B cells (PCD44 = 0.003; PCD80 = 0.0006) while CD44 is more expressed in wildtype CD4+ (P = 0.05) and CD8+ (P = 0.009) cells (n = 11 mice per group). (F) CD44 and CD80 surface levels were measured in splenocytes from MOG peptide-primed mice and restimulated in vitro. Higher levels of CD80 were detected in knockout B cells (PMOG1 = 0.01; PMOG10 = 0.002) and monocytes (PMOG1 = 0.03; PMOG10 = 0.05) (n = 8 mice per group). (G) Naïve CD4+ T cells from 2D2 mice were cocultured with B cells in the presence of increasing concentrations of MOG peptide. Knockout B cells showed increased antigen presenting activity as demonstrated by higher T cell proliferation rates (n = 3 mice per group). Differences between groups were assessed by two-tailed Student’s t test. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001.

Ataxin-1 regulates the immune response. (A) All Atxn1 variants are up-regulated in spleens of EAE mice (20 dpi) as compared to controls (n = 3 mice per group). (B) Adoptive transfer of Atxn1 splenocytes drives a more severe passive EAE as compared to Atxn1 cells (n = 18 knockout mice, n = 17 wildtype mice). (C) A higher percentage of Th1 cells was measured in Atxn1 splenocytes from MOG peptide-primed mice restimulated in vitro (n = 5 mice per group). (D) Similar percentages of Th1, Th17, and Treg cells were measured for both genotypes in pure cultures of naïve CD4+ T cells (n = 6 mice per group). (E) Surface levels of CD44 and CD80 were assessed in naïve splenocytes. In the heatmap, each column represents the mean of all mice in the group for each cytotype and each row the levels of a specific marker. The levels of both markers are increased in knockout B cells (PCD44 = 0.003; PCD80 = 0.0006) while CD44 is more expressed in wildtype CD4+ (P = 0.05) and CD8+ (P = 0.009) cells (n = 11 mice per group). (F) CD44 and CD80 surface levels were measured in splenocytes from MOG peptide-primed mice and restimulated in vitro. Higher levels of CD80 were detected in knockout B cells (PMOG1 = 0.01; PMOG10 = 0.002) and monocytes (PMOG1 = 0.03; PMOG10 = 0.05) (n = 8 mice per group). (G) Naïve CD4+ T cells from 2D2 mice were cocultured with B cells in the presence of increasing concentrations of MOG peptide. Knockout B cells showed increased antigen presenting activity as demonstrated by higher T cell proliferation rates (n = 3 mice per group). Differences between groups were assessed by two-tailed Student’s t test. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001. Considering the heterogeneity of splenocyte cultures, the increased Th1 polarization could reflect an intrinsic property of knockout cluster of differentiation (CD)4+ T cells or, alternatively, an indirect mechanism where ataxin-1 loss in antigen-presenting cells (APCs) influences T cell differentiation. To discern between these two scenarios, we measured the propensity of isolated naïve CD4+ T cells to differentiate toward Th1, Th17, and Treg lineages in response to nonselective T cell receptor stimulation via anti-CD3/anti-CD28 engagement. Under these conditions, no differences were detected between naïve knockout and wildtype T cells (Fig. 2), suggesting that the elevated Th1 differentiation postimmunization and exacerbated phenotype of the Atxn1 strain could result from an indirect effect on APC function. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed by flow cytometry the cell surface expression of CD44 and CD80 in splenic T cells (CD4+ and CD8+), B cells, and monocytes. Both proteins are critical costimulatory molecules in T cell activation and promote Th1 differentiation (16, 17). Basal expression of both markers in naïve mice was increased in knockout B cells while CD44 was decreased in knockout T cells (Fig. 2 and ). A similar increase in CD44 and CD80 levels was also measured in knockout B cells and monocytes upon MOG peptide stimulation (Fig. 2 and ). B cells participate in Th1 reactivation in the nervous system (18, 19), and when used in vitro, B cells from Atxn1 mice were able to induce maximal T cell proliferation in CD4+ lymphocytes from MOG-2D2 mice at lower concentrations of MOG peptide as compared to wildtype B cells (Fig. 2), confirming that ataxin-1 ablation compromised their immunoregulatory function.

B Cells Are the Primary Target of Ataxin-1 in the Immune System.

In order to fully capture the contribution of B cells to the EAE phenotype and precisely dissect the function of ataxin-1 in their biology, we characterized B cell populations in Atxn1 mice. First, we performed a thorough immunophenotyping of the different B cell subsets present in the spleens of naïve and MOG peptide immunized mice (20). In both conditions, we detected a significant increase of B-1a and B-1b cells in knockout animals as compared to controls, while marginal zone (MZ) B-2 cells were slightly, yet significantly decreased (Fig. 3 and ). No differences were measured in the frequency of follicular B-2 and regulatory B cells between the two genotypes (Fig. 3 and ). This observation suggests a systemic dysregulation of the B cell compartment as a result of ataxin-1 deficiency. In contrast, ataxin-1 ablation does not appear to affect CD4+ and CD8+ T cell lineages as we did not detect any significant changes in their naïve, central memory, and effector subsets, either before or after MOG35–55 priming (). The central role of B cells is further supported by the significantly higher number of B cells detected in the spinal cord parenchyma of Atxn1 mice at disease onset, while no differences were measured in infiltrating T cells (Fig. 3 ).
Fig. 3.

Ataxin-1 controls the functions of the B cell compartment. (A) Splenocytes from Atxn1 and wildtype mice were analyzed by flow cytometry for different CD19+ B cell subpopulations. A significant increase was measured for the percentage of B-1a [CD5+,CD43+,IgMhigh, immunoglobulin D (IgD)low] and B-1b (CD5−,CD43+,IgMhigh,IgDlow) subsets in knockout animals as compared to controls, while marginal zone B-2 cells (CD5−,CD43−,IgMhigh,IgDlow) were significantly decreased. No differences were instead measured in the size of regulatory (CD5+,CD43−,IgMhigh,IgDlow) and follicular B-2 (CD5−,CD43−,IgMlow,IgDhigh) cell populations between the two genotypes (n = 4 to 5 mice per group). (B) Histological analysis of B cell infiltration into the spinal cord of Atxn1 and wildtype mice upon EAE. Paraffin-embedded sections from spinal cords (cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions) were collected at EAE onset (10 dpi) and stained for B cells using an antibody for B220. Digital images were then acquired and B cell infiltration was measured as the area positive to B220 stain relative to the total area of the spinal cord section. A significant increase in infiltrating B cells was quantified in the thoracic region of Atxn1 mice (n = 10 mice per group). (C) T cell infiltration was similarly assessed using an antibody for CD3. No significant differences were detected between genotypes (n = 10 mice per group). Scale bar: 50 μm. Differences in the size of cell populations were assessed by two-tailed Student’s t test while differences in cell infiltration were assessed by one-tailed Student’s t test. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01.

Ataxin-1 controls the functions of the B cell compartment. (A) Splenocytes from Atxn1 and wildtype mice were analyzed by flow cytometry for different CD19+ B cell subpopulations. A significant increase was measured for the percentage of B-1a [CD5+,CD43+,IgMhigh, immunoglobulin D (IgD)low] and B-1b (CD5−,CD43+,IgMhigh,IgDlow) subsets in knockout animals as compared to controls, while marginal zone B-2 cells (CD5−,CD43−,IgMhigh,IgDlow) were significantly decreased. No differences were instead measured in the size of regulatory (CD5+,CD43−,IgMhigh,IgDlow) and follicular B-2 (CD5−,CD43−,IgMlow,IgDhigh) cell populations between the two genotypes (n = 4 to 5 mice per group). (B) Histological analysis of B cell infiltration into the spinal cord of Atxn1 and wildtype mice upon EAE. Paraffin-embedded sections from spinal cords (cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions) were collected at EAE onset (10 dpi) and stained for B cells using an antibody for B220. Digital images were then acquired and B cell infiltration was measured as the area positive to B220 stain relative to the total area of the spinal cord section. A significant increase in infiltrating B cells was quantified in the thoracic region of Atxn1 mice (n = 10 mice per group). (C) T cell infiltration was similarly assessed using an antibody for CD3. No significant differences were detected between genotypes (n = 10 mice per group). Scale bar: 50 μm. Differences in the size of cell populations were assessed by two-tailed Student’s t test while differences in cell infiltration were assessed by one-tailed Student’s t test. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01. Next, we explored the role of ataxin-1 on B cell-mediated antibody production by assessing immunoglobulin levels in serum. A significant increase in total immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) was found in naïve Atxn1 mice compared to wildtype animals, and such increase in IgM levels persisted after MOG peptide immunization (). We also measured the MOG peptide-specific humoral response in immunized mice and found that Atxn1 animals produce higher levels of anti-MOG35–55 IgG antibodies while no differences were detected for anti-MOG35–55 IgM ().

Ataxin-1 Regulates B Cell Functions through Specific Genetic Programs.

RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) transcriptomic profiling of B cells from naïve and MOG peptide-primed mice were performed in order to reconstruct the genetic networks controlled by ataxin-1 in response to an autoimmune challenge. Comparative analysis identified 86 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between wildtype and knockout B cells at baseline (Fig. 4 and Dataset S1), while 562 DEGs were detected upon MOG35–55 immunization (Fig. 4 and Dataset S1). These differences are sufficient to clearly segregate the two genotypes at both states by unsupervised hierarchical clustering. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment was performed on each DEG list to capture the biological functions associated with these genes. At baseline, “regulation of cell activation” (fold increase: 5.4, Pcorr = 10−7) resulted in the top GO term (Fig. 4 and Dataset S2), while “mitotic cell cycle progress” (fold increase: 4.7, Pcorr = 10−26) was the most significant ontology in primed cells (Fig. 4 and Dataset S2). Independent validation by qRT-PCR amplification of 33 candidate genes confirmed the RNA-seq results (). Network analysis also highlighted that MOG35–55 responsive genes are enriched in protein-protein interactions (P < 10−16) as components of the mitotic molecular machinery (Fig. 4). Conversely, no enrichment in physical interactions was found for baseline DEGs. Ataxin-1 inhibits the expression of target genes through its binding partner CIC, for which specific binding motifs are known (21). Consequently, we screened the promoter regions of all of the DEGs for the presence of two known CIC-binding motifs, TGAATGAA and TGAATGGA, and observed a significant enrichment only for the former at baseline (fold increase: 2.6, P = 0.03). From these results, we conclude that baseline DEGs are likely to be direct targets of ataxin-1 while the transcriptional changes taking place after MOG35–55 stimulation represent secondary events.
Fig. 4.

Ataxin-1 controls B cell proliferation. (A and B) Unsupervised clustering of the DEGs separates Atxn1 and wildtype B cells at baseline and 10 dpi (n = 3 per group). (C and D) Histograms showing the top five most significant GO terms at baseline and 10 dpi, respectively. (E) Protein network built using the DEGs from the primed B cells as input. (F) Validation of Ccnd1 and Ccnd2 expression by qRT-PCR (n = 3 mice per group). (G) The activation status of seven phosphoproteins was assessed in naïve splenocytes (n = 11 mice per group). p38MAPK was hyperphosphorylated in Atxn1 B cells as compared to wildtype cells (P = 0.008). (H) The same phosphoproteins were also tested in splenocytes at 10 dpi (n = 8 mice per group). ERK1/2 was hyperphosphorylated in all of the tested knockout cytotypes (PCD4 = 0.002; PCD8 = 0.01; PB cells = 0.007). The same trend was observed for STAT1 (PCD4 = 0.0002; PCD8 = 0.0004; PB cells = 0.0003), while p38MAPK was hyperphosphorylated only in knockout T cells (PCD4 = 0.01; PCD8 = 0.03). STAT3 was hyperphosphorylated only in knockout CD4+ cells (P = 0.04) and STAT6 only in knockout CD8+ cells (P = 0.02). (I) The same seven phosphoproteins were analyzed in primed splenocytes restimulated in vitro (n = 8 mice per group). STAT1 was hyperphosphorylated in both knockout T and B cells (PCD4 = 0.02; PCD8 = 0.008; PB cells = 0.004) while STAT3 was more activated in knockout T cells (PCD4 = 0.003; PCD8 = 0.03). ERK1/2 phosphorylation was increased in knockout CD4+ cells (P = 0.02). In the heatmaps, each column represents the mean of all mice in the group for each cytotype and each row the levels of a specific phosphoprotein. Differences between groups were assessed by two-tailed Student’s t test *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001.

Ataxin-1 controls B cell proliferation. (A and B) Unsupervised clustering of the DEGs separates Atxn1 and wildtype B cells at baseline and 10 dpi (n = 3 per group). (C and D) Histograms showing the top five most significant GO terms at baseline and 10 dpi, respectively. (E) Protein network built using the DEGs from the primed B cells as input. (F) Validation of Ccnd1 and Ccnd2 expression by qRT-PCR (n = 3 mice per group). (G) The activation status of seven phosphoproteins was assessed in naïve splenocytes (n = 11 mice per group). p38MAPK was hyperphosphorylated in Atxn1 B cells as compared to wildtype cells (P = 0.008). (H) The same phosphoproteins were also tested in splenocytes at 10 dpi (n = 8 mice per group). ERK1/2 was hyperphosphorylated in all of the tested knockout cytotypes (PCD4 = 0.002; PCD8 = 0.01; PB cells = 0.007). The same trend was observed for STAT1 (PCD4 = 0.0002; PCD8 = 0.0004; PB cells = 0.0003), while p38MAPK was hyperphosphorylated only in knockout T cells (PCD4 = 0.01; PCD8 = 0.03). STAT3 was hyperphosphorylated only in knockout CD4+ cells (P = 0.04) and STAT6 only in knockout CD8+ cells (P = 0.02). (I) The same seven phosphoproteins were analyzed in primed splenocytes restimulated in vitro (n = 8 mice per group). STAT1 was hyperphosphorylated in both knockout T and B cells (PCD4 = 0.02; PCD8 = 0.008; PB cells = 0.004) while STAT3 was more activated in knockout T cells (PCD4 = 0.003; PCD8 = 0.03). ERK1/2 phosphorylation was increased in knockout CD4+ cells (P = 0.02). In the heatmaps, each column represents the mean of all mice in the group for each cytotype and each row the levels of a specific phosphoprotein. Differences between groups were assessed by two-tailed Student’s t test *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001. Longitudinal comparisons were also performed within each genotype to identify those genes dynamically regulated along the immune response. By comparing the transcriptomic profiles at baseline and upon MOG peptide immunization, 210 DEGs were found in wildtype cells and 867 DEGs in knockout cells ( and Dataset S1), with an overlap of 107 genes (). GO analysis on the knockout B cell-specific 760 DEGs identified the term “inflammation response” as the most significantly enriched (fold increase: 3.0, Pcorr = 10−11) ( and Dataset S2). Independent qRT-PCR validation on 17 genes contributing to this ontology confirmed their up-regulation in MOG peptide-stimulated knockout B cells, including the interleukin-18 (IL-18) encoding Il18 and the complement components C1qa, C1qb, C1qc, and C6 (). No differences were measured in the expression of the same genes in wildtype B cells (). Longitudinal analysis also highlighted the significant up-regulation of genes encoding matrix metalloproteinases (Mmp8, Mmp9, Mmp11, Mmp13, Mmp14, Mmp25, Mmp27) in knockout B cells upon MOG peptide stimulation (). No differences were instead found for the Mmp genes expressed in wildtype B cells (). This is consistent with the higher B cell infiltration observed in the spinal cord of Atxn1 mice, and with previous reports implicating the ATXN1 protein family in extracellular matrix remodeling (7).

MAPK and STAT Signaling Pathways Are Modulated by Ataxin-1 in B Cells.

Collectively, our analysis highlights a repressing activity for ataxin-1 on B cell activation, cytokine production, and proliferation. In fact, key factors for G-to-S phase transition such as cyclins D1 and D2 (Ccnd1 and Ccnd2) were overexpressed in knockout cells as confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR (Fig. 4). A link between ataxin-1 and cell proliferation has been recently described, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling was shown to be critical in mediating this function (22). The “regulation of MAPK cascade” term was found enriched also in our GO analysis, supporting its possible involvement in B cell proliferation. We sought to experimentally test this hypothesis by employing phosphoflow cytometry to profile the activation status of the main intracellular pathways in different immune cell populations before and after MOG stimulation. Multiple cascades were hyperactivated in knockout cells. Among them, the MAPK pathways p38 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 showed higher phosphorylation levels in knockout B cells respectively at baseline (Fig. 4 and ) and after MOG peptide stimulation (Fig. 4 and ). Furthermore, several signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) cascades were found hyperphosphorylated in both knockout T and B cells after MOG peptide priming, and their activation persisted also upon MOG peptide restimulation in vitro (Fig. 4 and ). Notably, STAT1 activation in CD4+ T cells is required for optimal Th1 development (23).

The ATXN1-CIC Axis Is Critical for B Cell-Dependent Immunomodulation.

From a molecular standpoint, ataxin-1 works in concert with its paralog ataxin-1 like (ATXN1L) protein to bind and stabilize CIC (7, 24). Notably, Cic is significantly down-regulated in B cells upon MOG peptide stimulation while no differences were detected in the levels of Atxn1 and Atxn1l transcripts (). To confirm in vivo the role of ataxin-1 in B cells and assess whether its immunomodulatory activity is mediated by the same set of native interactions, we generated a panel of conditional knockout lines to selectively disrupt the ATXN1-ATXN1L-CIC complex in relevant immune cell lineages. Specifically, we bred transgenic mice in which Atxn1l or Cic gene has been floxed (5) with Cd19-Cre or Cd79a-Cre drivers for B cell-targeted knockout (25, 26). As a control, we also crossed them with a driver line in which the Cre-recombinase is under the control of the human CD2 promoter, for efficient deletion in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (27). We then induced EAE in each conditional knockout line and followed disease course up to 30 dpi. We found that mice lacking CIC in B cells display a significantly more severe disease at peak (15 to 16 dpi) than floxed controls (Fig. 5), while no differences were measured in mice lacking ATXN1L in B cells (Fig. 5). This is likely due to insufficient CIC destabilization as a consequence of ATXN1L ablation (). Also, as suggested by our in vitro experiments on isolated CD4+ T cells, knocking out neither Cic nor Atxn1l in T lymphocytes influenced the EAE course (Fig. 5 ).
Fig. 5.

Ataxin-1 mediates its immunoregulatory function in B cells through CIC interactions. (A and B) EAE was induced in conditional knockout lines in which the ataxin-1 interactors CIC and ATXN1L were selectively ablated in the B cell lineage using B cell-specific Cre drivers (Cd19-Cre or Cd79-Cre). B cell-specific CIC-null mice showed more severe disease at peak (15 to 16 dpi) as compared to floxed littermates (Cre), while no statistically significant differences were detected in the EAE course of B cell-specific ATXN1L-null animals and controls (n = 18 Cd19-Cre;Cic mice, n = 12 Cd19-Cre;Cic mice, n = 8 Cd79-Cre;Atxn1l mice, n = 8 Cd79-Cre;Atxn1l mice). (C and D) Conditional knockout lines in which CIC and ATXN1L were selectively ablated in T cells were also generated using a CD2-Cre driver. No differences in the EAE phenotype were measured in both lines as compared to their floxed littermates (n = 18 CD2-Cre;Cic mice, n = 13 CD2-Cre;Cic mice, n = 9 CD2-Cre;Atxn1l mice, n = 17 CD2-Cre;Atxn1l mice). Differences between scores in each day were assessed by two-tailed Student’s t test *P ≤ 0.05.

Ataxin-1 mediates its immunoregulatory function in B cells through CIC interactions. (A and B) EAE was induced in conditional knockout lines in which the ataxin-1 interactors CIC and ATXN1L were selectively ablated in the B cell lineage using B cell-specific Cre drivers (Cd19-Cre or Cd79-Cre). B cell-specific CIC-null mice showed more severe disease at peak (15 to 16 dpi) as compared to floxed littermates (Cre), while no statistically significant differences were detected in the EAE course of B cell-specific ATXN1L-null animals and controls (n = 18 Cd19-Cre;Cic mice, n = 12 Cd19-Cre;Cic mice, n = 8 Cd79-Cre;Atxn1l mice, n = 8 Cd79-Cre;Atxn1l mice). (C and D) Conditional knockout lines in which CIC and ATXN1L were selectively ablated in T cells were also generated using a CD2-Cre driver. No differences in the EAE phenotype were measured in both lines as compared to their floxed littermates (n = 18 CD2-Cre;Cic mice, n = 13 CD2-Cre;Cic mice, n = 9 CD2-Cre;Atxn1l mice, n = 17 CD2-Cre;Atxn1l mice). Differences between scores in each day were assessed by two-tailed Student’s t test *P ≤ 0.05.

Discussion

Here, we present the functional characterization of the MS risk locus mapping to chromosome 6p22 in which the strongest association was detected in the ataxin-1 encoding ATXN1 gene. Specifically, ataxin-1 controls distinct genetic programs that limit excessive proliferation and activation of B cells in a proinflammatory milieu. The lack of ataxin-1 regulatory activity results in an exaggerated immune activation that eventually leads to a Th1/Th2 ratio imbalance, amplifying the autoimmune injury. The current working hypothesis for MS pathogenesis postulates that aberrant immune responses are driven by the transcriptional dysregulation of a specific set of genes (11, 28, 29). The present findings further support this paradigm whereby ataxin-1 represents a high-rank repressor of gene expression for multiple genes and biochemical pathways. Several studies aimed at identifying the genetic targets of ataxin-1. For instance, microarray profiling of cerebellar tissues from Atxn1-null mice identified alterations in the expression of genes regulated by Sp1-dependent transcription, such as dopamine receptor D2 (Drd2) and retinoic acid/thyroid hormone (30). Gene expression analysis in the cerebellum of the knock-in SCA1 model highlighted alterations in the insulin-like growth factor pathway (31), and the use of laser-capture to isolate Purkinje neurons from knock-in mouse cerebella led to the identification of the vascular endothelial growth factor (Vegf) as a direct target of ataxin-1 (32). Our transcriptional profiling of Atxn1 B cells showed that numerous components of the mitotic apparatus including the cyclins D1 and D2 are up-regulated in response to MOG peptide stimulation. This correlates with the expansion of specific B cell subsets that can modulate EAE pathology such as B-1a cells (33). B-1 cells have been also found increased in the cerebrospinal fluid of MS patients and CD5 expression on their surface correlates with disease activity (34, 35). Interestingly, increased levels of cyclin D1 were also reported in the cerebellum of SCA1 knock-in mice (36), pointing at cell cycle dysregulation of specific cell niches as an underlying mechanism in both neurodegeneration and autoimmunity. Consistent with this model, the pathological expansion of cerebellar stem cells has been recently found in postnatal SCA1 mice (37). Transcriptomic analysis also revealed that specific genes encoding proinflammatory factors are selectively up-regulated in Atxn1 B cells upon MOG peptide stimulation. Noteworthy, among them, the IL-18 cytokine promotes Th1 activity and self-reactive IgG and IgM antibody responses (38, 39), which is consistent with our observations of increased Th1 lymphocytes and antibody titers in Atxn1 mice. Genes encoding complement proteins were also up-regulated in primed knockout B cells. This cascade modulates EAE progression and is required for development of maximal disease (40). Complement genes are also associated with neurodegenerative phenotypes in MS (41). In addition to exaggerated cell proliferation, we found an increased humoral response as a consequence of ataxin-1 deficiency in B cells. Autoantibodies against murine recombinant MOG and MOG peptide are not generally considered pathogenic due to a proline to serine substitution at position 42 between murine and human proteins (42). However, a small body of experimental evidence exists, suggesting the potential involvement of antibodies anti-murine MOG peptide in modulating disease. Serum levels of anti-MOG35–55 IgGs correlate with disease progression (43), and passive transfer of serum from MOG peptide immunized mice was shown to aggravate EAE severity in wildtype mice (44). Moreover, anti-MOG35–55 antibodies were confirmed to target neural precursor cells (NPCs) in the subventricular zone of the hippocampus and trigger apoptotic pathways (45). Another relevant finding of the present study is the central role that ATXN1-CIC interactions play in mediating the immunomodulatory effects on B cells. CIC is a transcriptional repressor of the high mobility group (HMG)-box family, which binds specific DNA sites in target genes. Beyond its role in SCA1 and neurodevelopment, CIC’s repressing activity was shown to exert tumor suppressive functions, and damaging mutations in the CIC gene have been associated with the development and progression of several neoplastic syndromes (46). Intriguingly, CIC loss-of-function was also demonstrated to promote aberrant activation of adaptive immunity via excessive development of follicular helper T cells and germinal center (GC) responses (47). Our data add to this picture a suppressive function for CIC also on exaggerated activation and proliferation of B cells in response to encephalitogenic challenges. At the molecular level, CIC is a downstream effector of the ERK pathway and its binding to target genes is abolished by phosphorylation at conserved serine residues (48), either due to decreased protein stability or increased cytoplasmic translocation. The phosphoflow analysis conducted here found this cascade significantly hyperactivated in Atxn1 B cells. Hence, we argue that cell cycle dysregulation in knockout B cells presumably takes place via ERK-dependent CIC inactivation. It is interesting that ablation of the other ataxin-1 interactor ATXN1L failed to recapitulate the effects on EAE phenotype of ataxin-1 or CIC depletion. These results indicate that CIC is the likely downstream effector of ataxin-1 activity while ATXN1L’s presence in the complex is dispensable, probably due to its redundancy with ataxin-1. In fact, we did not observe a reduction in CIC levels upon ATXN1L ablation in B cells. This is in line with previous reports showing that Atxn1l knockout mice could only partially phenocopy double Atxn1-Atxn1l animals (7). Lastly, these results further support the pathogenic role for B cells in starting CNS autoimmunity linked, at least in part, to the individual genetic signature. The interest in B cells in MS pathogenesis has been recently fueled by successful therapeutic depleting strategies (49). In EAE, B cells can exert opposite effects, either pathogenic or protective, depending on the specific encephalitogen adopted for immunization and reflecting the engagement of distinct B cell subsets and mechanisms of action (50). In the MOG35–55 paradigm, B cell depletion was demonstrated to worsen the disease due to the removal of interleukin 10 (IL-10) producing regulatory B cells (51). Some authors have also reported that B cell depletion after immunization ameliorates the phenotype through ablation of interleukin 6 (IL-6) producing pathogenic B cells (52). EAE is an imperfect model for MS and a number of caveats should be considered when translating evidence collected in this animal disease to the human counterpart. Although the contribution of ataxin-1-mediated mechanisms taking place in CNS cells cannot be ruled out, the data highlight a previously unrecognized role of ataxin-1 in B cell biology and neuroinflammation, and suggests the ataxin-1-CIC pathway as a possible checkpoint to target autoimmune demyelination.

Materials and Methods

All animal procedures were performed in compliance with experimental guidelines approved by the University of California, San Francisco Committee on Animal Research (CAR). Details on the different mouse lines employed in this study as well as on the protocols for inducing EAE and for histopathological analyses are provided in the . Details on antibodies, Western blotting, cell activation and differentiation assays, T-B cell cocultures, phosphoflow cytometry, immunophenotyping, immunoglobulin quantification, RNA-seq, quantitative RT-PCR, bioinformatic and statistical analyses are also provided in the .
  52 in total

1.  B-cell activation influences T-cell polarization and outcome of anti-CD20 B-cell depletion in central nervous system autoimmunity.

Authors:  Martin S Weber; Thomas Prod'homme; Juan C Patarroyo; Nicolas Molnarfi; Tara Karnezis; Klaus Lehmann-Horn; Dimitry M Danilenko; Jeffrey Eastham-Anderson; Anthony J Slavin; Christopher Linington; Claude C A Bernard; Flavius Martin; Scott S Zamvil
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 10.422

2.  Ocrelizumab in Primary Progressive and Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Stephen L Hauser; Shibeshih Belachew; Ludwig Kappos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  ATAXIN-1 interacts with the repressor Capicua in its native complex to cause SCA1 neuropathology.

Authors:  Yung C Lam; Aaron B Bowman; Paymaan Jafar-Nejad; Janghoo Lim; Ronald Richman; John D Fryer; Eric D Hyun; Lisa A Duvick; Harry T Orr; Juan Botas; Huda Y Zoghbi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Multiple sclerosis genomic map implicates peripheral immune cells and microglia in susceptibility.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Transcript specific regulation of expression influences susceptibility to multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Maria Ban; Wenjia Liao; Amie Baker; Alastair Compston; John Thorpe; Paul Molyneux; Mary Fraser; Jyoti Khadake; Joanne Jones; Alasdair Coles; Stephen Sawcer
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  IL-18 directs autoreactive T cells and promotes autodestruction in the central nervous system via induction of IFN-gamma by NK cells.

Authors:  F D Shi; K Takeda; S Akira; N Sarvetnick; H G Ljunggren
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  B cells promote induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by facilitating reactivation of T cells in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Emily R Pierson; Ingunn M Stromnes; Joan M Goverman
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Mice lacking ataxin-1 display learning deficits and decreased hippocampal paired-pulse facilitation.

Authors:  A Matilla; E D Roberson; S Banfi; J Morales; D L Armstrong; E N Burright; H T Orr; J D Sweatt; H Y Zoghbi; M M Matzuk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  B cell depletion therapy ameliorates autoimmune disease through ablation of IL-6-producing B cells.

Authors:  Tom A Barr; Ping Shen; Sheila Brown; Vicky Lampropoulou; Toralf Roch; Sarah Lawrie; Boli Fan; Richard A O'Connor; Stephen M Anderton; Amit Bar-Or; Simon Fillatreau; David Gray
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Capicua deficiency induces autoimmunity and promotes follicular helper T cell differentiation via derepression of ETV5.

Authors:  Sungjun Park; Seungwon Lee; Choong-Gu Lee; Guk Yeol Park; Hyebeen Hong; Jeon-Soo Lee; Young Min Kim; Sung Bae Lee; Daehee Hwang; Youn Soo Choi; John D Fryer; Sin-Hyeog Im; Seung-Woo Lee; Yoontae Lee
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Genetics and functional genomics of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Woori Kim; Nikolaos A Patsopoulos
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 9.623

2.  The novel multiple sclerosis susceptibility gene ATXN1 regulates B cell receptor signaling in B-1a cells.

Authors:  Qin Ma; Alessandro Didonna
Journal:  Mol Brain       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.041

3.  Pan-Cancer Analysis Reveals the Multidimensional Expression and Prognostic and Immunologic Roles of VSTM2L in Cancer.

Authors:  Shuyi Zhang; Hailin Xiong; Jiahui Yang; Xia Yuan
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-01-27

4.  Epigenetic control of ataxin-1 in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Qin Ma; Jorge R Oksenberg; Alessandro Didonna
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 5.430

5.  TopoDB: a novel multifunctional management system for laboratory animal colonies.

Authors:  Adam Renschen; Atsuko Matsunaga; Jorge R Oksenberg; Adam Santaniello; Alessandro Didonna
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.451

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.