| Literature DB >> 32878170 |
Herman M Chambaro1,2,3, Michihito Sasaki1, Edgar Simulundu4,5, Isaac Silwamba4, Yona Sinkala3, Gabriel Gonzalez6, David Squarre7,8, Paul Fandamu3, Caesar H Lubaba3, Musso Munyeme4, Alikhadio Maseko3, Choopa Chimvwele3, Liywalii Mataa3, Lynnfield E Mooya2,3, Andrew N Mukubesa4, Hayato Harima1, Kenny L Samui4, Hetron M Munang'andu9, Martin Simuunza4, King S Nalubamba4, Yongjin Qiu10, Michael J Carr6,11, William W Hall6,11,12, Yuki Eshita10, Hirofumi Sawa1,11,12, Yasuko Orba1,11.
Abstract
Bluetongue (BT) is an arthropod-borne viral disease of ruminants with serious trade and socio-economic implications. Although the disease has been reported in a number of countries in sub-Saharan Africa, there is currently no information on circulating serotypes and disease distribution in Zambia. Following surveillance for BT in domestic and wild ruminants in Zambia, BT virus (BTV) nucleic acid and antibodies were detected in eight of the 10 provinces of the country. About 40% (87/215) of pooled blood samples from cattle and goats were positive for BTV nucleic acid, while one hartebeest pool (1/43) was positive among wildlife samples. Sequence analysis of segment 2 revealed presence of serotypes 3, 5, 7, 12 and 15, with five nucleotypes (B, E, F, G and J) being identified. Segment 10 phylogeny showed Zambian BTV sequences clustering with Western topotype strains from South Africa, intimating likely transboundary spread of BTV in Southern Africa. Interestingly, two Zambian viruses and one isolate from Israel formed a novel clade, which we designated as Western topotype 4. The high seroprevalence (96.2%) in cattle from Lusaka and Central provinces and co-circulation of multiple serotypes showed that BT is widespread, underscoring the need for prevention and control strategies.Entities:
Keywords: Reoviridae; Zambia; bluetongue; bluetongue virus; domestic ruminants; sero-surveillance; serotypes; topotypes; wild ruminants
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32878170 PMCID: PMC7552058 DOI: 10.3390/v12090963
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1Map showing sample collection sites, bluetongue virus nucleic acid detection, antibody and serotyping results in selected districts and provinces of Zambia.
Summary of blood and serum samples collected from domestic and wild ruminants in selected provinces Zambia.
| Province | District | Species | Blood † | Sera | Year (Season) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copperbelt | Mpongwe | Cattle | 100 (10) | - | 2018 (Dry) |
| Eastern | Lundazi | Cattle | 350 (35) | - | 2018 (Wet) |
| Northern | Mbala | Cattle | 200 (20) | - | 2016 (Wet) |
| Kasama | Cattle | 243 (25) | - | 2016 (Wet) | |
| Mpika | Cattle | 200 (20) | - | 2016 (Wet) | |
| North-Western ‡ | Ikelenge | Buffalo | 5(1) | - | 2017 (Dry) |
| Western | Mongu | Cattle | 210 (21) | - | 2018 (Dry) |
| Goats | 84 (9) | - | 2018 (Dry) | ||
| Sheep | 6 (1) | - | 2018 (Dry) | ||
| Senanga | Cattle | 350 (35) | - | 2017 (Dry) | |
| Southern | Livingstone | Cattle | 104 (11) | - | 2019 (Dry) |
| Livingstone | Goats | 99 (10) | - | 2019 (Dry) | |
| Livingstone | Buffalo | 11 (5) | - | 2017 (Dry) | |
| Namwala | Cattle | 188 (19) | - | 2017 (Wet) | |
| Kafue National Park | Mumbwa | Impala | 98 (21) | - | 2017 (Dry) |
| Hartebeest | 29 (8) | - | 2017 (Dry) | ||
| Lusaka ‡ | Chongwe | Hartebeest | 76 (8) | - | 2018 (Dry) |
| Central | Shibuyunji | Cattle | 110 | 2017 (Dry) | |
| Mumbwa | Cattle | 115 | 2017 (Wet) | ||
| Itezhi tezhi | Cattle | 114 | 2017 (Wet) | ||
| Lusaka | Chongwe | Cattle | 110 | 2017 (Wet) | |
| Total | 2353 (259) | 449 |
† Total number of samples (pooled samples), ‡ private game ranch.
Bluetongue virus nucleic acid detection results in pooled blood from domestic and wild ruminants in selected provinces of Zambia.
| Province | District | Species | Pools Tested | qRT-PCR † | Season |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copperbelt | Mpongwe | Cattle | 10 | 1 (10) | Dry |
| Eastern | Lundazi | Cattle | 35 | 16 (45.7) | Wet |
| Northern | Mbala | Cattle | 20 | 16 (80) | Wet |
| Kasama | Cattle | 25 | 18 (72) | Wet | |
| Mpika | Cattle | 20 | 11 (55) | Wet | |
| North-Western ‡ | Ikelenge | Buffalo | 1 | 0 (0) | Dry |
| Western | Mongu | Cattle | 21 | 4 (19) | Dry |
| Goats | 9 | 2 (22.2) | Dry | ||
| Sheep | 1 | 0 (0) | Dry | ||
| Senanga | Cattle | 35 | 2 (5.7) | Dry | |
| Southern | Livingstone | Cattle | 11 | 6 (54.5) | Dry |
| Goats | 10 | 8 (80) | Dry | ||
| Buffalo | 5 | 0 (0) | Dry | ||
| Namwala | Cattle | 19 | 2 (10.5) | Wet | |
| Kafue National Park | Mumbwa | Impala | 21 | 0 (0) | Dry |
| Hartebeest | 8 | 1 (12.5) | Dry | ||
| Lusaka ‡ | Chongwe | Hartebeest | 8 | 0 (0) | Wet |
| Total | 259 | 87 (33.6) |
† Positive (percent), ‡ private game ranch.
Pooled prevalence of bluetongue virus nucleic acid during different seasons in domestic and wild ruminants from Zambia.
| Species | Sampling Season | Pools † | Pooled Prevalence ‡ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cattle, goats, buffalo, impala, hartebeest | Wet, Dry | 87/259 (33.6) | 4.4 (3.6–5.4) |
| Cattle, goats, buffalo, impala, hartebeest | Dry | 17/99 (17.2) | 2.2 (1.4–3.2) |
| Cattle | Wet and Dry | 76/196 (38.8) | 4.8 (3.8–6.0) |
| Cattle | Wet | 63/119 (52.9) | 7.3 (5.6–9.3) |
| Cattle | Dry | 13/77 (16.9) | 1.8 (1.0–3.1) |
| Goats | Wet | - | - |
| Goats | Dry | 10/19 (52.6) | 7.2 (3.3–13.1) |
| Cattle and Goats | Dry | 23/96 (24.0) | 2.7 (1.7–4.0) |
| Wildlife | Dry | 1/43 (2.3) | 0.4% (0.0–1.8]) |
† Positive pools/total no. tested (% positive), ‡ percent (95% CI); %, percent; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2Phylogenetic tree of segment 2 gene of viruses detected in this study. The tree was generated using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the general time reversable (GTR) model with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Numbers at branch nodes indicate bootstrap values (>60%). Viruses characterized in the present study are in red text. Shaded area and letters represent BTV nucleotypes. References sequences for BTV1 to 28 are in black text. Bar—number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Abbreviations: EP, Eastern Province; SP, Southern Province; WP, Western Province; NP, Northern Province; LZ, Lundazi; MG, Mongu; LIV, Livingstone; NM, Namwala; MB, Mbala; KS, Kasama; MPK, Mpika.
Figure 3Phylogenetic tree of segment 10 gene of viruses detected in this study. The tree was generated using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura 3-parameter (T92) model with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Numbers at branch nodes indicate bootstrap values (> 60%). Viruses characterized in the present study are in red text. Novel topotype is in green text. Right brackets—clade. Shaded area—topotype. Reference sequences for Western and Eastern topotypes are in black text. Bar—number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Abbreviations: EP, Eastern Province; SP, Southern Province; WP, Western Province; NP, Northern Province; LZ, Lundazi; MG, Mongu; NM, Namwala; MB, Mbala; KS, Kasama; MPK, Mpika.