| Literature DB >> 32878020 |
Malena Dos Santos Guilherme1, Victor F Zevallos2,3, Aline Pesi2, Nicolai M Stoye1, Vu Thu Thuy Nguyen1, Konstantin Radyushkin4, Andreas Schwiertz5, Ulrich Schmitt4, Detlef Schuppan2,6, Kristina Endres1.
Abstract
Wheat amylase trypsin inhibitors (ATIs) represent a common dietary protein component of gluten-containing cereals (wheat, rye, and <span class="Species">barley). They act as toll-like receptor 4 ligands, and are largely resistant to intestinal proteases, eliciting a mild inflammatory response within the intestine after oral ingestion. Importantly, nutritional ATIs exacerbated inflammatory bowel disease and features of fatty liver disease and the metabolic syndrome in mice. For Alzheimer's disease (AD), both inflammation and altered insulin resistance are major contributing factors, impacting onset as well as progression of this devastating brain disorder in patients. In this study, we evaluated the impact of dietary ATIs on a well-known rodent model of AD (5xFAD). We assessed metabolic, behavioral, inflammatory, and microbial changes in mice consuming different dietary regimes with and without ATIs, consumed ad libitum for eight weeks. We demonstrate that ATIs, with or without a gluten matrix, had an impact on the metabolism and gut microbiota of 5xFAD mice, aggravating pathological hallmarks of AD. If these findings can be translated to patients, an ATI-depleted diet might offer an alternative therapeutic option for AD and warrants clinical intervention studies.Entities:
Keywords: 5xFAD; ATI; Aβ; TLR4; gluten; inflammation; intestine; microbiota; plaque; wheat sensitivity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32878020 PMCID: PMC7503408 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21176288
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Acceptance of diet, and body weight development of 5xFAD mice fed with a standardized diet containing no, high or low amounts of wheat amylase trypsin inhibitors (ATIs) on a gluten-containing or gluten-free background. (a) Schematic representation of the diets and experimental regime. Mice were aged 4 weeks when all animals received the diet without gluten or ATI for 4 weeks to achieve a basal condition. Afterwards, animals were assigned to the four different diets for 8 weeks. Animals were sacrificed at a final age of 16 weeks. (b) Food consumption per day in the start phase (week 1–4) and on the different diets. (c) Body weight at sacrifice (n ≥ 8 per group; all data presented as mean + SEM; One Way ANOVA with Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparisons test; *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01).
Figure 2Activity and metabolic capacity of 5xFAD mice under the 4 different diets. (a) Locomotive activity during dark and light phase was assessed by light-beam sensors. (b) Oxygen consumption. Mice were placed in metabolic cages for 48 h and one cycle of measurement including 24 h was used for analysis (n ≥ 7 per group). The dark phase is indicated by a grey box. Shown are means per time point; SEMs and p-values of multiple t-test comparison are not shown for clearness of the graphs (p-values are given in Table S2).
Figure 3Micromorphological measurements and quantitation of inflammatory markers in the small intestine of 5xFAD mice fed with ATI-deficient or ATI-supplemented diet. Tissue specimens were drop-fixed and subsequently two slices per tissue sample and animal were used for HE staining. Length of two villi and the thickness of the underneath located muscularis were measured per slide. (a) Exemplary pictures of duodenum and terminal ileum. For an example of measures of villus length (1) or muscularis thickness (2), see the magnified segment of the terminal ileum on the right. (b) Relative measures of duodenal villi. (c) Thickness of muscularis from duodenum. (d) Villus length within terminal ileum sections. (e) Muscularis thickness within terminal ileum sections. All data are given as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed by One Way ANOVA (Sidak’s multiple comparisons test; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; n = 7 animals per group). (f) Interleukin 1 β (IL1β) and (g) C–C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) mRNA levels of terminal ileum were quantified by qPCR and normalized to beta actin mRNA levels. Data present mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed by One Way ANOVA (Uncorrected Fisher’s LSD test; *, p < 0.05; n = 4–8 animals per group).
Figure 4Fecal microbial communities in animals are changed by nutritional ATIs. Fecal samples were collected during sacrifice and subjected to quantitative PCR-based analysis. (a) Ratio of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes. (b) Bifidobacteria in relation to total bacterial cell counts. (c) Lactobacilli in relation to total bacterial cell counts. (d) Ratio of Lactobacilli to Enterococci. All data are given as mean + SEM. Statistical analysis was performed by One Way ANOVA (Sidak’s multiple comparisons test; *, p < 0.05; n ≥ 6 per group).
Figure 5Influence of the quantity of ATI supplied in the diets on hippocampus-dependent tasks in 5xFAD mice. Mice were subjected to fear conditioning learning and memory recall in a context (a)- or cue (b)-dependent manner. (c) Nesting score. Mice were habituated to a special nesting material and nests were scored after overnight construction. All data are presented as mean with SEM. Statistical analysis was performed by pairwise Student’s t-test (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; n ≥ 6 per group).
Figure 6Inflammatory markers and plaque deposition in the brain of 5xFAD mice ingesting different levels of ATIs. (a) IL1β and (b) CCL2 mRNA levels were quantified by qPCR and normalized to beta actin mRNA levels. Data present means ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed by One Way ANOVA (n = 4–6 animals per group). (c) Positioning of densitometric analysis areas on the brain slides (S: Subiculum; Dg: Dentate gyrus). Exemplarily, a slide derived from a mouse fed with gluten- and ATI-free diet is shown. (d) Quantitative analysis of Aβ-containing depositions. Measurements have been corrected for background (Bkg) and are presented as staining relative to area in % of gluten-free/ATI-free diet. Two slides per animal were analyzed (n = 5–8). All data are given as mean + SEM. Statistical analysis was performed by One Way ANOVA (*, p < 0.05).