Literature DB >> 32877507

Fertility patients under COVID-19: attitudes, perceptions and psychological reactions.

Reut Ben-Kimhy1,2, Michal Youngster3,4, Tamar R Medina-Artom5,6, Sarit Avraham3,4, Itai Gat3,4,7, Lilach Marom Haham8, Ariel Hourvitz3,4, Alon Kedem3,4.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: What are the perceptions of infertility patients and the factors correlating with their psychological distress, following suspension of fertility treatments during the Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic? SUMMARY ANSWER: Most patients preferred to resume treatment given the chance regardless of background characteristics; higher self-mastery and greater perceived social support were associated with lower distress, while feeling helpless was associated with higher distress. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Infertility diagnosis and treatment frequently result in significant psychological distress. Recently published data have shown that clinic closure during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a sharp increase in the prevalence of anxiety and depression among infertile patients undergoing IVF and was perceived as an uncontrollable and stressful event. Personal resources play an important protective role in times of crisis, helping reduce levels of distress. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This cross-sectional questionnaire study included patients whose fertility treatment was suspended following the COVID-19 pandemic, in a tertiary hospital. The survey was delivered to 297 patients within 12 days at the beginning of April 2020. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: The self-administered questionnaire included items addressing: (i) patients' demographic characteristics, (ii) anxiety related to COVID-19 infection risk and level of social support, (iii) patients' perceptions of the new guidelines and description of subsequently related emotions and (iv) two validated scales assessing levels of emotional distress and self-mastery. Multivariate analysis was conducted to assess factors alleviating or increasing emotional distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There were 168 patients who completed the survey, giving a response rate of 57%. Study variables in the regression model explained 38.9% of the variance in psychological distress experienced by patients during treatment suspension. None of the background characteristics (e.g. age, marital status, parity, economic level or duration of treatments) had a significant contribution. Feeling helpless following the suspension of treatments was associated with higher distress (P < 0.01). Higher self-mastery and greater perceived social support were associated with lower distress (P < 0.01). Despite the ministry of health's decision, 72% of patients wished to resume treatment at the time of survey. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This was a cross-sectional study, thus information about patients' characteristics prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was not available. The length and implications of this pandemic are unknown. Therefore, the ability to draw conclusions about the psychological consequences of the crisis is limited at this point of time. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Personal resources play an important protective role in times of crisis, helping to reduce levels of distress. Study findings suggest that attention should be paid to strengthening and empowering patients' personal resources together with directly confronting and containing feelings of helplessness. In line with the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) guidelines, especially at this time of high levels of distress, it is imperative to offer emotional support to reduce stress and concerns. Furthermore, as the pandemic is stabilizing, resumption of treatment should be considered as soon as appropriate according to local conditions. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by the IVF unit of the Shamir Medical Center. All authors declare no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; IVF; fertility treatments; infertility; stress

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32877507      PMCID: PMC7499650          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  15 in total

1.  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on infertility patients and endometriosis patients in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Kimmy Rosielle; Jasmijn Bergwerff; Anneke M F Schreurs; José Knijnenburg; Bianca De Bie; Jacques W M Maas; Annemiek W Nap; Madelon van Wely; Cornelis B Lambalk; Mariëtte Goddijn; Inge M Custers; Laura L van Loendersloot; Velja Mijatovic
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Infertility Management Disruption During the COVID-19 Outbreak in a Middle-Income Country: Patients' Choices, Attitudes, and Concerns.

Authors:  Nadia Muhaidat; Mohammad A Alshrouf; Abdulrahman M Karam; Mohammed Elfalah
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  Sexual and psychological health of couples with azoospermia in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Meng Dong; Yanqiang Tao; Shanshan Wu; Zhengtao Li; Xiaobin Wang; Jichun Tan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination and infertility treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Sarit Avraham; Alon Kedem; Hilli Zur; Michal Youngster; Odelia Yaakov; Gil M Yerushalmi; Itai Gat; Yariv Gidoni; Alyssa Hochberg; Micha Baum; Ariel Hourvitz; Ettie Maman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 7.490

5.  Changes in sexual behaviour, anxiety symptoms, and quality of couple relationship of patients with infertility during the COVID-19 lockdown.

Authors:  Meng Dong; Yanqiang Tao; Shanshan Wu; Lin Kong; Feifei Zhou; Jichun Tan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Investigating the impact of asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection on female fertility and in vitro fertilization outcomes: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Meng Wang; Qiyu Yang; Xinling Ren; Juan Hu; Zhou Li; Rui Long; Qingsong Xi; Lixia Zhu; Lei Jin
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-07-06

7.  The Impact of Postponed Fertility Treatment on the Sexual Health of Infertile Patients Owing to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Meng Dong; Shanshan Wu; Yanqiang Tao; Feifei Zhou; Jichun Tan
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-10

8.  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women seeking fertility treatment: the patient's perspective.

Authors:  Shona Wedner-Ross; Cordula Schippert; Frauke von Versen-Höynck
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  Expectant Management Before In vitro Fertilization in Women Aged 39 or Above and Unexplained Infertility Does Not Decrease Live Birth Rates Compared to Immediate Treatment.

Authors:  Andrea Roberto Carosso; Rik van Eekelen; Alberto Revelli; Stefano Canosa; Noemi Mercaldo; Ilaria Stura; Stefano Cosma; Carlotta Scarafia; Chiara Benedetto; Gianluca Gennarelli
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Perceptions of the COVID-19 Pandemic among Women with Infertility: Correlations with Dispositional Optimism.

Authors:  Amanda J Dillard; Ava E Weber; Amanda Chassee; Mili Thakur
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.