Erin M Kirkham1, Karen Hoi2, Jonathan B Melendez2, Lauren M Henderson2, Aleda M Leis3, Michael P Puglia3, Ronald D Chervin4. 1. Department of Otolaryngology: Head & Neck Surgery, Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1540 E. Hospital Dr. CW 5-702, SPC 4241, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. ekirkham@umich.edu. 2. University of Michigan Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, Section of Pediatric Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 4. Sleep Disorders Center and Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To test for differences in DISE findings in children sedated with propofol versus dexmedetomidine. We hypothesized that the frequency of ≥ 50% obstruction would be higher for the propofol than dexmedetomidine group at the dynamic levels of the airway (velum, lateral walls, tongue base, and supraglottis) but not at the more static adenoid level. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was performed on children age 1-18 years with a diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who underwent DISE from July 2014 to Feb 2019 scored by the Chan-Parikh scale sedated with either propofol or dexmedetomidine (with or without ketamine). Logistic regression was used to test for a difference in the odds of ≥ 50% obstruction (Chan-Parikh score ≥ 2) at each airway level with the use of dexmedetomidine vs. propofol, adjusted for age, sex, previous tonsillectomy, surgeon, positional OSA, and ketamine co-administration. RESULTS: Of 117 subjects, 57% were sedated with propofol and 43% with dexmedetomidine. Subjects were 60% male, 66% Caucasian, 31% obese, 38% syndromic, and on average 6.5 years old. Thirty-three percent had severe OSA and 41% had previous tonsillectomy. There was no statistically significant difference in the odds of ≥ 50% obstruction between the two anesthetic groups at any level of the airway with or without adjustment for potential confounders. CONCLUSION: We did not find a significant difference in the degree of upper airway obstruction on DISE in children sedated with propofol versus dexmedetomidine. Prospective, randomized studies would be an important next step to confirm these findings.
PURPOSE: To test for differences in DISE findings in children sedated with propofol versus dexmedetomidine. We hypothesized that the frequency of ≥ 50% obstruction would be higher for the propofol than dexmedetomidine group at the dynamic levels of the airway (velum, lateral walls, tongue base, and supraglottis) but not at the more static adenoid level. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was performed on children age 1-18 years with a diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who underwent DISE from July 2014 to Feb 2019 scored by the Chan-Parikh scale sedated with either propofol or dexmedetomidine (with or without ketamine). Logistic regression was used to test for a difference in the odds of ≥ 50% obstruction (Chan-Parikh score ≥ 2) at each airway level with the use of dexmedetomidine vs. propofol, adjusted for age, sex, previous tonsillectomy, surgeon, positional OSA, and ketamine co-administration. RESULTS: Of 117 subjects, 57% were sedated with propofol and 43% with dexmedetomidine. Subjects were 60% male, 66% Caucasian, 31% obese, 38% syndromic, and on average 6.5 years old. Thirty-three percent had severe OSA and 41% had previous tonsillectomy. There was no statistically significant difference in the odds of ≥ 50% obstruction between the two anesthetic groups at any level of the airway with or without adjustment for potential confounders. CONCLUSION: We did not find a significant difference in the degree of upper airway obstruction on DISE in children sedated with propofol versus dexmedetomidine. Prospective, randomized studies would be an important next step to confirm these findings.
Authors: Macario Camacho; Brandyn Dunn; Carlos Torre; Jodie Sasaki; Raymond Gonzales; Stanley Yung-Chuan Liu; Dylan K Chan; Victor Certal; Benjamin B Cable Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Ronald D Chervin; Deborah L Ruzicka; Bruno J Giordani; Robert A Weatherly; James E Dillon; Elise K Hodges; Carole L Marcus; Kenneth E Guire Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Shan He; Nithin S Peddireddy; David F Smith; Angela L Duggins; Christine Heubi; Sally R Shott; Stacey L Ishman Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Carlos Flores-Mir; Mohamed Korayem; Giseon Heo; Manisha Witmans; Michael P Major; Paul W Major Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: Carole L Marcus; Reneé H Moore; Carol L Rosen; Bruno Giordani; Susan L Garetz; H Gerry Taylor; Ron B Mitchell; Raouf Amin; Eliot S Katz; Raanan Arens; Shalini Paruthi; Hiren Muzumdar; David Gozal; Nina Hattiangadi Thomas; Janice Ware; Dean Beebe; Karen Snyder; Lisa Elden; Robert C Sprecher; Paul Willging; Dwight Jones; John P Bent; Timothy Hoban; Ronald D Chervin; Susan S Ellenberg; Susan Redline Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 91.245