Literature DB >> 32876796

The darn technique for small (< 2 cm diameter) midline hernias.

M Pawlak1, M Newman2, A C de Beaux2, B Tulloh2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Primary midline hernias arising in the linea alba are common. While mesh repair has been shown to reduce recurrence rates even in small hernias, many surgeons still use a suture repair for defects of less than 2 cm. The recent European and Americas Hernia Societies Guidelines recommended suture repair only for hernias smaller than 1 cm. A suture repair implies edge-to-edge or overlapping fascial margins, which necessarily involves tension on the repair. A darn is a tension-free repair where, in effect, a "mesh" is hand-woven across the defect in situ.
METHODS: The darn repair is a modification of the darn techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Eligible patients undergoing this repair at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2017 were identified from a prospective computer-based medical record system and their case notes reviewed. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with a primary midline abdominal wall defect smaller than 2 cm in the widest diameter of the hernia defect measured intra-operatively. Patients were followed up by telephone in 2019. Those who reported possible recurrence or other symptoms in the region of their hernia repair were reviewed in the outpatient clinic.
RESULTS: 47 suture-darn repairs were undertaken over the 10-year period. Fifteen of the darn repair operations (32%) were performed under local anaesthesia. Forty-one patients were followed up with a mean of 80 ± 35 and median of 87 months after surgery. Six patients (13%) were lost to follow-up. Recurrence was found in two cases (5%) and one patient has since been diagnosed with a new epigastric hernia some 5 cm cranial to the previous repair.
CONCLUSIONS: The darn repair for small primary midline hernias is quick and inexpensive with promising long-term results. It can be performed under local anaesthesia. It can serve as an alternative to mesh repair for defects less than 2 cm in maximum dimension.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Darn repair; Epigastric hernia; Suture repair; Umbilical hernia

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32876796     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02283-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  10 in total

1.  Hernia mesh complications may have affected up to 170 000 patients, investigation finds.

Authors:  Jacqui Wise
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-09-27

2.  Long-term follow-up after elective adult umbilical hernia repair: low recurrence rates also after non-mesh repairs.

Authors:  J Dalenbäck; C Andersson; D Ribokas; G Rimbäck
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Author response to: Comment on: Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society.

Authors:  N A Henriksen; A Montgomery
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Current trends in hernia surgery in NHS England.

Authors:  M Pawlak; B Tulloh; A de Beaux
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Factors Associated With Long-term Outcomes of Umbilical Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Divya A Shankar; Kamal M F Itani; William J O'Brien; Vivian M Sanchez
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Long-term recurrence and chronic pain after repair for small umbilical or epigastric hernias: a regional cohort study.

Authors:  Mette W Christoffersen; Frederik Helgstrand; Jacob Rosenberg; Henrik Kehlet; Pernille Strandfelt; Thue Bisgaard
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia in adults: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial.

Authors:  Ruth Kaufmann; Jens A Halm; Hasan H Eker; Pieter J Klitsie; Jeroen Nieuwenhuizen; Dick van Geldere; Maarten P Simons; Erwin van der Harst; Martijne van 't Riet; Bronno van der Holt; Gert Jan Kleinrensink; Johannes Jeekel; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Open mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Donna Shrestha; Alice Shrestha; Badri Shrestha
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 6.071

9.  Reoperation versus clinical recurrence rate after ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Frederik Helgstrand; Jacob Rosenberg; Henrik Kehlet; Pernille Strandfelt; Thue Bisgaard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Lower Risk of Recurrence After Mesh Repair Versus Non-Mesh Sutured Repair in Open Umbilical Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  T Bisgaard; R Kaufmann; M W Christoffersen; P Strandfelt; L L Gluud
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.360

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.