Literature DB >> 32876731

When is the circumferential stabilization necessary for subaxial cervical fracture dislocations? The posterior ligament-bone injury classification and severity score: a novel treatment algorithm.

Jun-Song Yang1,2, Peng Liu2, Tuan-Jiang Liu2, Hai-Ping Zhang2, Zheng-Ping Zhang2, Liang Yan2, Yuan Tuo2, Hao Chen2, Peng Zou2, Qing-Da Li2, Yuan-Ting Zhao2, Ding-Jun Hao3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To propose a novel classification and scoring system called the posterior ligament-bone injury classification and severity score (PLICS) that offers a quantitative score to guide the need for posterior stabilization in addition to anterior reconstruction for subaxial cervical fracture dislocations (SCFDs).
METHODS: A total of 456 patients with SCFDs were prospectively included. Patients with PLICS ≥ 7 together with extremely unstable lateral mass fracture (EULMF) were classified as high-risk group, and the other patients were classified as low-risk group. For patients in the low-risk group, anterior-only reconstruction was performed; for patients in the high-risk group, additional posterior lateral mass fixation and fusion was performed after anterior reconstruction. Clinical outcome evaluation included using the visual analogue score (VAS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale. The change in the local sagittal alignment kyphosis Cobb angle was also recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 370 patients (81.1%) completed the minimal 12-month follow-ups, including 321 patients of low-risk group and 49 patients of high-risk group. Compared with the average VAS score preoperatively, the score at 12-month follow-up was significantly improved (from 6.1 + 0.3 to 1.1 + 0.2 in the low-risk group, P < 0.001; from 6.4 + 0.2 to 1.4 + 0.2 in the high-risk group, P < 0.001). The average NDI score at the 12-month follow-up was statistically low in the low-risk group (8.8 + 2.5 vs 13.8 + 3.4, P = 0.034). At least more than one grade improvement in the ASIA scale was observed in 80.5% of all patients. The local kyphosis Cobb angle at the injured segment averaged improved in both groups.
CONCLUSION: A PLICS score ≥ 7 together with EULMF can be the threshold for posterior stabilization in addition to anterior reconstruction for the patients with SCFDs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fracture dislocation; Radiological failure; Subaxial cervical spine injury; Treatment algorithms

Year:  2020        PMID: 32876731     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06580-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  17 in total

1.  Cervical spine injury severity score. Assessment of reliability.

Authors:  Paul A Anderson; Timothy A Moore; Kirkland W Davis; Robert W Molinari; Daniel K Resnick; Alexander R Vaccaro; Christopher M Bono; John R Dimar; Bizhan Aarabi; Glen Leverson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Controversies in the treatment of cervical spine dislocations.

Authors:  Joon Y Lee; Ahmad Nassr; Jason C Eck; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  A single-stage posterior approach with open reduction and pedicle screw fixation in subaxial cervical facet dislocations.

Authors:  Jin Hoon Park; Sung Woo Roh; Seung Chul Rhim
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-04-24

4.  AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system.

Authors:  Alexander R Vaccaro; John D Koerner; Kris E Radcliff; F Cumhur Oner; Maximilian Reinhold; Klaus J Schnake; Frank Kandziora; Michael G Fehlings; Marcel F Dvorak; Bizhan Aarabi; Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran; Gregory D Schroeder; Christopher K Kepler; Luiz R Vialle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Subaxial cervical spine injury classification systems.

Authors:  Bizhan Aarabi; Beverly C Walters; Sanjay S Dhall; Daniel E Gelb; R John Hurlbert; Curtis J Rozzelle; Timothy C Ryken; Nicholas Theodore; Mark N Hadley
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Anterior Reduction and Fusion of Cervical Facet Dislocations.

Authors:  Christian B Theodotou; George M Ghobrial; Andrew L Middleton; Michael Y Wang; Allan D Levi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Posterior approach for cervical fracture-dislocations with traumatic disc herniation.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nakashima; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Keigo Ito; Masaaki Machino; Hany El Zahlawy; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Subaxial cervical spine trauma classification: the Subaxial Injury Classification system and case examples.

Authors:  Alpesh A Patel; Andrew Dailey; Darrel S Brodke; Michael Daubs; Paul A Anderson; R John Hurlbert; Alexander R Vacccaro
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.047

9.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with structural allograft and plates for the treatment of unstable posterior cervical spine injuries.

Authors:  Richard S Woodworth; William J Molinari; Daniel Brandenstein; William Gruhn; Robert W Molinari
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-02

10.  Traumatic Cervical Unilateral and Bilateral Facet Dislocations Treated With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Has a Low Failure Rate.

Authors:  Alireza K Anissipour; Julie Agel; Matthew Baron; Erik Magnusson; Carlo Bellabarba; Richard J Bransford
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Biomechanical effects of different lateral mass injury patterns on subaxial cervical fracture dislocations after anterior cervical surgery: a finite element study.

Authors:  Junsong Yang; Qingda Li; Peng Liu; Liang Yan; Tuanjiang Liu; Jijun Liu; Qinpeng Zhao; Baorong He; He Zhao; Bing Qian; Yuanting Zhao; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.940

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.