Alex Uhr1, Lydia Glick, Leonard G Gomella. 1. Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is a common malignancy with highly variable clinical presentation and outcomes. Diagnosis and management remain a challenge and at times become highly controversial. Novel biomarker assays have shown promise as an adjunctive tool to aid in patient shared decision-making, risk stratification, and disease management. This presentation at the 2020 Jefferson Urology Symposium provided a review of current commonly used biomarkers for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the current literature on the use of biomarkers in the diagnosis and treatment decisions in localized prostate cancer. RESULTS: Biomarker assays were reviewed and presented according to clinical application of each test. In the consideration of initial prostate biopsy the blood tests for PHI, and 4K Score, and urine tests PCA3, Select MDx and ExoDx are available. In the consideration of treatment versus active surveillance in the biopsy positive setting OncotypeDx, Prolaris and Decipher are available. In patients with an initial negative biopsy, 4K score, PCA3, ExoDx and the tissue biopsy based Confirm MDx assay can help guide the decision to perform repeat biopsy. In the consideration for adjuvant radiation following radical prostatectomy the most extensive literature available supports the use of Prolaris or Decipher tissue assays. CONCLUSIONS: With the significant burden of men being diagnosed with prostate cancer, it is desirable to appropriately risk stratify patients to avoid unnecessary biopsies and over-treatment in low risk patients and guide appropriate treatment strategies in high risk patients. Selected biomarkers presented are useful adjunctive precision medicine tools to aid in shared decision making and to direct treatment decisions.
INTRODUCTION:Prostate cancer is a common malignancy with highly variable clinical presentation and outcomes. Diagnosis and management remain a challenge and at times become highly controversial. Novel biomarker assays have shown promise as an adjunctive tool to aid in patient shared decision-making, risk stratification, and disease management. This presentation at the 2020 Jefferson Urology Symposium provided a review of current commonly used biomarkers for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the current literature on the use of biomarkers in the diagnosis and treatment decisions in localized prostate cancer. RESULTS: Biomarker assays were reviewed and presented according to clinical application of each test. In the consideration of initial prostate biopsy the blood tests for PHI, and 4K Score, and urine tests PCA3, Select MDx and ExoDx are available. In the consideration of treatment versus active surveillance in the biopsy positive setting OncotypeDx, Prolaris and Decipher are available. In patients with an initial negative biopsy, 4K score, PCA3, ExoDx and the tissue biopsy based Confirm MDx assay can help guide the decision to perform repeat biopsy. In the consideration for adjuvant radiation following radical prostatectomy the most extensive literature available supports the use of Prolaris or Decipher tissue assays. CONCLUSIONS: With the significant burden of men being diagnosed with prostate cancer, it is desirable to appropriately risk stratify patients to avoid unnecessary biopsies and over-treatment in low risk patients and guide appropriate treatment strategies in high risk patients. Selected biomarkers presented are useful adjunctive precision medicine tools to aid in shared decision making and to direct treatment decisions.
Authors: Martina Maggi; Francesco Del Giudice; Ugo G Falagario; Andrea Cocci; Giorgio Ivan Russo; Marina Di Mauro; Giuseppe Salvatore Sepe; Fabio Galasso; Rosario Leonardi; Gabriele Iacona; Peter R Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg; Angelo Porreca; Matteo Ferro; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Daniela Terracciano; Luigi Cormio; Giuseppe Carrieri; Ettore De Berardinis; Alessandro Sciarra; Gian Maria Busetto Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Brian T Helfand; Michael Paterakos; Chi-Hsiung Wang; Pooja Talaty; John Abran; John Bennett; David W Hall; Amy Lehman; Tamer Aboushwareb Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Byeongdo Song; Sung Il Hwang; Hak Jong Lee; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sangchul Lee Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2022-10-07 Impact factor: 1.817