Rufina Lee1, Jennifer Scodes2, Els van der Ven3, Jean-Marie Alves-Bradford2, Franco Mascayano2, Stephen Smith2, Lisa Dixon2,4. 1. Hunter College Silberman School of Social Work, City University of New York, New York, New York, USA. 2. New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA. 3. Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA. 4. Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
AIM: To examine differences in demographic, clinical, social, functional and help-seeking characteristics of homeless vs housed individuals enrolled in specialized early intervention teams in the United States. METHODS: Participants comprised 1349 individuals enrolled across 21 teams. Teams report individual-level data including homelessness status at admission. Bivariate differences between homeless and housed participants were analysed using Wilcoxon-rank, chi-square, Fisher-exact and t tests, as appropriate. RESULTS: Approximately 5% of participants were homeless at admission. Homeless participants were less likely to be enrolled in school and/or employed (12.2% vs 43.4%); to have more involvement in the legal system (23.0% vs 6.2%); and to have had a more restrictive pathway to care, than housed participants. CONCLUSIONS: Homeless young people with recent-onset psychosis have a substantially greater need for a diversity of services for psychosocial needs. Homeless individuals may also have a more adverse pathway to care and directed outreach to engage this population may be needed.
AIM: To examine differences in demographic, clinical, social, functional and help-seeking characteristics of homeless vs housed individuals enrolled in specialized early intervention teams in the United States. METHODS: Participants comprised 1349 individuals enrolled across 21 teams. Teams report individual-level data including homelessness status at admission. Bivariate differences between homeless and housed participants were analysed using Wilcoxon-rank, chi-square, Fisher-exact and t tests, as appropriate. RESULTS: Approximately 5% of participants were homeless at admission. Homeless participants were less likely to be enrolled in school and/or employed (12.2% vs 43.4%); to have more involvement in the legal system (23.0% vs 6.2%); and to have had a more restrictive pathway to care, than housed participants. CONCLUSIONS: Homeless young people with recent-onset psychosis have a substantially greater need for a diversity of services for psychosocial needs. Homeless individuals may also have a more adverse pathway to care and directed outreach to engage this population may be needed.
Authors: David P Folsom; William Hawthorne; Laurie Lindamer; Todd Gilmer; Anne Bailey; Shahrokh Golshan; Piedad Garcia; Jürgen Unützer; Richard Hough; Dilip V Jeste Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Christoph U Correll; Britta Galling; Aditya Pawar; Anastasia Krivko; Chiara Bonetto; Mirella Ruggeri; Thomas J Craig; Merete Nordentoft; Vinod H Srihari; Sinan Guloksuz; Christy L M Hui; Eric Y H Chen; Marcelo Valencia; Francisco Juarez; Delbert G Robinson; Nina R Schooler; Mary F Brunette; Kim T Mueser; Robert A Rosenheck; Patricia Marcy; Jean Addington; Sue E Estroff; James Robinson; David Penn; Joanne B Severe; John M Kane Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 21.596