Literature DB >> 32875581

Artificial placenta and womb technology: Past, current, and future challenges towards clinical translation.

Felix R De Bie1,2, Marcus G Davey1, Abby C Larson1, Jan Deprest2, Alan W Flake1.   

Abstract

Extreme prematurity remains a major cause of neonatal mortality and severe long-term morbidity. Current neonatal care is associated with significant morbidity due to iatrogenic injury and developmental immaturity of extreme premature infants. A more physiologic approach, replacing placental function and providing a womb-like environment, is the foundational principle of artificial placenta (AP) and womb (AW) technology. The concept has been studied during the past 60 years with limited success. However, recent technological advancements and a greater emphasis on mimicking utero-placental physiology have improved the success of experimental models, bringing the technology closer to clinical translation. Here, we review the rationale for and history of AP and AW technology, discuss the challenges that needed to be overcome, and compare recent successful models. We conclude by outlining some remaining challenges to be addressed on the path towards clinical translation and opportunities for future research.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32875581     DOI: 10.1002/pd.5821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  5 in total

1.  The limits of viability of extremely preterm infants.

Authors:  Michael H Malloy; Leonard K Wang
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2022-05-05

2.  Interprofessional Consensus Regarding Design Requirements for Liquid-Based Perinatal Life Support (PLS) Technology.

Authors:  M Beatrijs van der Hout-van der Jagt; E J T Verweij; Peter Andriessen; Willem P de Boode; Arend F Bos; Frank L M Delbressine; Alex J Eggink; Jan Jaap H M Erwich; Loe M G Feijs; Floris Groenendaal; Boris W W Kramer; A Titia Lely; Rachel F A M Loop; Franziska Neukamp; Wes Onland; Martijn A Oudijk; Arjan B Te Pas; Irwin K M Reiss; Mark Schoberer; Ralph R Scholten; Marc E A Spaanderman; Myrthe van der Ven; Marijn J Vermeulen; Frans N van de Vosse; S Guid Oei
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  Impact of the Addition of a Centrifugal Pump in a Preterm Miniature Pig Model of the Artificial Placenta.

Authors:  Alex J Charest-Pekeski; Steven K S Cho; Tanroop Aujla; Liqun Sun; Alejandro A Floh; Mark J McVey; Ayman Sheta; Marvin Estrada; Lynn Crawford-Lean; Celeste Foreman; Dariusz Mroczek; Jaques Belik; Brahmdeep S Saini; Jessie Mei Lim; Olivia J Moir; Fu-Tsuen Lee; Megan Quinn; Jack R T Darby; Mike Seed; Janna L Morrison; Christoph Haller
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Editorial: Neonatal ECMO in 2019: Where Are We Now? Where Next?

Authors:  Giacomo Cavallaro; Matteo Di Nardo; Aparna Hoskote; Dick Tibboel
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.418

5.  Ethical Development of Artificial Amniotic Sac and Placenta Technology: A Roadmap.

Authors:  E J Verweij; Lien De Proost; Judith O E H van Laar; Lily Frank; Sylvia A Obermann-Borstn; Marijn J Vermeulen; Sophie van Baalen; M Beatrijs van der Hout-van der Jagt; Elselijn Kingma
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.418

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.