BACKGROUND:Clinical decision support (CDS) is a promising tool for reducing antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections (ARIs). OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of previously effective CDS on antibiotic-prescribing rates for ARIs when adapted and implemented in diverse primary care settings. DESIGN: Cluster randomized clinical trial (RCT) implementing a CDS tool designed to guide evidence-based evaluation and treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis and pneumonia. SETTING:Two large academic health system primary care networks with a mix of providers. PARTICIPANTS: All primary care practices within each health system were invited. All providers within participating clinic were considered a participant. Practices were randomized selection to a control or intervention group. INTERVENTIONS: Intervention practice providers had access to an integrated clinical prediction rule (iCPR) system designed to determine the risk of bacterial infection from reason for visit of sore throat, cough, or upper respiratory infection and guide evidence-based evaluation and treatment. MAIN OUTCOME(S): Change in overall antibiotic prescription rates. MEASURE(S): Frequency, rates, and type of antibiotics prescribed in intervention and controls groups. RESULTS:33 primary care practices participated with 541 providers and 100,573 patient visits. Intervention providers completed the tool in 6.9% of eligible visits. Antibiotics were prescribed in 35% and 36% of intervention and control visits, respectively, showing no statistically significant difference. There were also no differences in rates of orders for rapid streptococcal tests (RR, 0.94; P = 0.11) or chest X-rays (RR, 1.01; P = 0.999) between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The iCPR tool was not effective in reducing antibiotic prescription rates for upper respiratory infections in diverse primary care settings. This has implications for the generalizability of CDS tools as they are adapted to heterogeneous clinical contexts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02534987). Registered August 26, 2015 at https://clinicaltrials.gov.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support (CDS) is a promising tool for reducing antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections (ARIs). OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of previously effective CDS on antibiotic-prescribing rates for ARIs when adapted and implemented in diverse primary care settings. DESIGN: Cluster randomized clinical trial (RCT) implementing a CDS tool designed to guide evidence-based evaluation and treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis and pneumonia. SETTING: Two large academic health system primary care networks with a mix of providers. PARTICIPANTS: All primary care practices within each health system were invited. All providers within participating clinic were considered a participant. Practices were randomized selection to a control or intervention group. INTERVENTIONS: Intervention practice providers had access to an integrated clinical prediction rule (iCPR) system designed to determine the risk of bacterial infection from reason for visit of sore throat, cough, or upper respiratory infection and guide evidence-based evaluation and treatment. MAIN OUTCOME(S): Change in overall antibiotic prescription rates. MEASURE(S): Frequency, rates, and type of antibiotics prescribed in intervention and controls groups. RESULTS: 33 primary care practices participated with 541 providers and 100,573 patient visits. Intervention providers completed the tool in 6.9% of eligible visits. Antibiotics were prescribed in 35% and 36% of intervention and control visits, respectively, showing no statistically significant difference. There were also no differences in rates of orders for rapid streptococcal tests (RR, 0.94; P = 0.11) or chest X-rays (RR, 1.01; P = 0.999) between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The iCPR tool was not effective in reducing antibiotic prescription rates for upper respiratory infections in diverse primary care settings. This has implications for the generalizability of CDS tools as they are adapted to heterogeneous clinical contexts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02534987). Registered August 26, 2015 at https://clinicaltrials.gov.
Authors: Shobha Phansalkar; Heleen van der Sijs; Alisha D Tucker; Amrita A Desai; Douglas S Bell; Jonathan M Teich; Blackford Middleton; David W Bates Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jeffrey A Linder; Jeffrey L Schnipper; Ruslana Tsurikova; D Tony Yu; Lynn A Volk; Andrea J Melnikas; Matvey B Palchuk; Maya Olsha-Yehiav; Blackford Middleton Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: P S Heckerling; T G Tape; R S Wigton; K K Hissong; J B Leikin; J P Ornato; J L Cameron; E M Racht Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1990-11-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Safiya Richardson; Rebecca Mishuris; Alexander O'Connell; David Feldstein; Rachel Hess; Paul Smith; Lauren McCullagh; Thomas McGinn; Devin Mann Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Ralph Gonzales; Tammy Anderer; Charles E McCulloch; Judith H Maselli; Frederick J Bloom; Thomas R Graf; Melissa Stahl; Michelle Yefko; Julie Molecavage; Joshua P Metlay Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-02-25 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: David A Feldstein; Rachel Hess; Thomas McGinn; Rebecca G Mishuris; Lauren McCullagh; Paul D Smith; Michael Flynn; Joseph Palmisano; Gheorghe Doros; Devin Mann Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Katharine E Henry; Roy Adams; Cassandra Parent; Hossein Soleimani; Anirudh Sridharan; Lauren Johnson; David N Hager; Sara E Cosgrove; Andrew Markowski; Eili Y Klein; Edward S Chen; Mustapha O Saheed; Maureen Henley; Sheila Miranda; Katrina Houston; Robert C Linton; Anushree R Ahluwalia; Albert W Wu; Suchi Saria Journal: Nat Med Date: 2022-07-21 Impact factor: 87.241