| Literature DB >> 32875282 |
Bhoomika Mathur1, Waqar Arif2, Megan E Patton1, Rahiman Faiyaz3, Jian Liu1, Jennifer Yeh4, Sanjiv Harpavat4, Kristina Schoonjans5, Auinash Kalsotra2, Antony M Wheatley3, Sayeepriyadarshini Anakk1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver diseases are caused by many factors, such as genetics, nutrition, and viruses. Therefore, it is important to delineate transcriptomic changes that occur in various liver diseases.Entities:
Keywords: AH, alcoholic hepatitis; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; APAP, acetaminophen; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; Bile acids; CA, cholic acid; CAR, constitutive androstane receptor; Cholestasis; Cytochrome p450; DKO, double knockout; Drug metabolism; FXRKO, FXR knockout; Fxr, farnesoid X receptor; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; GSH, glutathione disulphide; Liver diseases; NAPQI, N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine; NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; Nuclear receptors; PCN, pregnenolone 16 alpha-carbonitrile; PHx, partial hepatectomy; PXR, pregnane X receptor; SHPKO, SHP knockout; Shp, small heterodimer partner; Transcriptomics; WT, wild type
Year: 2020 PMID: 32875282 PMCID: PMC7452294 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JHEP Rep ISSN: 2589-5559
Fig. 1Genome-wide profiling reveals common and unique gene networks in cholestasis, steatosis, and regeneration.
Specific up- and downregulated pathways in (A) cholestatic (double knockout [DKO]), (B) diet-induced steatosis (high-fat diet [HFD]), and (C) regenerating (partial hepatectomy [PHx]) livers are shown. (D) Venn diagrams represent the overlap of either downregulated or upregulated gene expression amongst mouse models of cholestasis, fatty, and regeneration. Bar graph exhibits DAVID Gene Ontology network analysis for the common pathways in these diseased models. (n = 2–3 mice per group; fold change >1.5; FDR <30).
Fig. 2Constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) target signatures are induced specifically in cholestatic conditions.
Bar graphs show upregulated and downregulated biological pathways in (A) CAR- and (B) pregnane X receptor (PXR)-activated livers (n = 2–3 mice per group; Unpaired Student's t test; fold change >1.5; FDR <30). Venn diagrams show major overlap of (C) phase I genes between 1,4-bis (2-[3,5-dichloropyridyloxy]) benzene (TC)-treated and double-knockout (DKO) mice. (D) Phase II genes in DKO livers are equally spaced between TC- and pregnenolone 16 alpha-carbonitrile (PCN)-treated mice. Numbers indicate total number of genes in individual conditions and overlap of DKO with TC and PCN (n = 3 per group; Unpaired Student's t test; fold change >1.5; p <0.05). Heat maps represent that the cholestatic DKO livers recapitulate profiles of (E) phase I and (F) phase II genes observed in TC-treated (CAR-activated) livers (n = 2–3 mice per group; Unpaired Student's t test; fold change >1.5, p <0.05). Importantly, some of these gene changes were mimicked in bile acid (cholic acid) diet, but not in PCN-treated (PXR activated), high-fat diet (HFD), and partial hepatectomy (PHx) livers.
Fig. 3Changes in phase I and II genes in cholestatic mice result in protection against zoxazolamine and acetaminophen (APAP) toxicity.
(A) Double-knockout (DKO) cholestatic livers show increased immunofluorescence staining for CYP2B6 compared with wild-type (WT) livers (n = 4–5 mice per group; scale bar: 50 μm). (B) Bar graph indicates that DKO mice recover faster post zoxazolamine (zox)-induced paralysis than WT mice. Inhibiting constitutive androstane receptor activity with androstanol normalises the difference in paralysis time between WT and DKO mice (n = 3–4 mice per group; mean ± SEM; one-way ANOVA; ∗∗p <0.01). (C) Schematic of acetaminophen metabolism in the liver. (D and E) qPCR analysis shows upregulation of key genes involved in APAP metabolism in DKO livers (n = 4–6 mice per group; Student's t test; ∗p <0.05). (F) Hepatic glutathione disulphide (GSH) levels at different time points post-APAP treatment in control WT and cholestatic DKO mice. (G) Histological analysis of liver sections at 0, 6, and 24 h after APAP injection shows reduced necrosis in the DKO compared with WT mice (n = 4–6 mice per group; mean ± SEM; one-way ANOVA; ∗p <0.05, ∗∗p <0.01, ∗∗∗p <0.005, ∗∗∗∗p <0.001).
Fig. 4Inhibition of constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activity makes double-knockout (DKO) cholestatic livers susceptible to acetaminophen (APAP)-mediated toxicity.
Bar graphs show (A) serum liver injury markers and (B) hepatic glutathione disulphide (GSH) levels 1 h post-APAP treatment in control wild-type (WT) and cholestatic DKO mice. (C) qPCR analysis depicts no difference in the expression of key genes involved in phase I and II detoxification. (D and E) Histological analysis at 1 h after APAP injection shows similar necrosis in both the DKO and WT liver sections. (F) Post 1 h of APAP injection; no change in CYP2E1 protein levels is observed (n = 3 mice per group; Student t test; ∗p <0.05). Bar graphs show (G) no significant difference in serum liver injury markers, but (H) lower hepatic GSH levels in DKO mice injected with androstanol, a CAR antagonist, 1 h post-APAP treatment. (I) qPCR analysis depicts an upward trend in the expression of key genes involved in phase I and II detoxification in DKO mice. (J and K) Histological analysis revealed significant necrosis in DKO livers injected with androstanol compared with those in Fig. 3. However, the injury is still less severe than WT liver sections. (L) No difference in CYP2E1 protein levels is observed (n = 5 mice per group; one way ANOVA; ∗p <0.05, ∗∗p <0.005, ∗∗∗p <0.0005).
Fig. 5Comparative transcriptomic analyses indicate that drug metabolism is not a generalised response to liver injury.
Previously conducted transcriptomic data analyses for liver injury models in patient samples with viral (both hepatitis B and C) infection, alcoholic hepatitis (AH) (Gene Expression Omnibus [GEO] data set: GSE28619), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (GEO data set: GSE126848), and biliary atresia (GEO data sets: GSE46995 and GSE122340) were mined for alterations in gene expression. (A) Venn diagrams show little overlap in gene expression amongst these liver diseases. (B) Bar graph shows upregulated and downregulated biological pathways in livers from biliary atresia patients (Unpaired Student's t test; fold change >1.5; FDR <30). Heat maps display (C) phase I and (D) phase II drug metabolic genes in the liver diseases (Unpaired Student's t test; fold change >1.5; p <0.05). Biliary atresia gene expression profile was separated either by circulating gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels or by age.
Fig. 6Biliary atresia patients demonstrate increased activation of constitutive androstane receptor downstream targets.
Based on drug metabolic gene expression, microarray data for biliary atresia (Gene Expression Omnibus data set: GSE46995) were segregated into two groups: low gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) <450 IU/L (n = 21) and high GGT >850 IU/L (n = 17). Box plots show relative expression for (A) phase I and (B) phase II genes. mRNA expression was normalised to the median value of the low-GGT group (Student t test; ∗p <0.05, ∗∗p <0.01). (C) Immunohistochemical staining of CYP2B6 reveals robust staining in biliary epithelial cells, nerves, and in hepatocytes with an overall increase in its expression in biliary atresia samples compared with control.