| Literature DB >> 32874408 |
Ahmed Trabelsi1, Mohamed Ali Khalifa1, Rim Brahem2, Mehdi Jedidi1, Karim Bouattour1, Walid Osman1, Mohamed Laziz Ben Ayeche1.
Abstract
Fractures of the radial neck accounts for 1% of all childhood fractures and 5% to 10% of childhood traumatic lesions involving the elbow. Intramedullary percutaneous nail reduction (Metaizeau technique) is considered the most effective surgical technique. The purpose of this study was to identify the main clinical features of radial neck fracture in children and to evaluate the anatomical and functional results of the Metaizeau technique. In this retrospective study, we evaluated 22 patients under the age of 16 who were treated for radial neck fracture at the orthopedic and trauma surgery department of Sahloul University Hospital in Sousse over a period of 16 years from January 2001 to April 2017. Authors used Metaizeau classification. Functional results were evaluated by Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and the radiological evaluation was based on standard images with measurement of the residual rocker. The average age was 8.6 years (5-13 years). Seven fracture were grade III injuries and three grade IV. In the immediate postoperative period, radiological measurements showed a residual rocker less than 20° in 86.3% and more than 20° in 13.7% of cases. At an average follow-up of 13 months and a half, the MEPS score was excellent and good for 17 patients. Four types of complications were found: necrosis of the radial head in 1 case, pseudarthrosis in 1 case, periarticular calcification in 2 cases and stiff-ness of the elbow in 3 cases. Despite the small number of patients in our series, we believe that the elastic stable intramedullary pinning according to the Metaizeau technique is the treatment of choice for displaced radial neck fractures in children. Copyright: Ahmed Trabelsi et al.Entities:
Keywords: Metaizeau; child; fracture; radial Neck
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32874408 PMCID: PMC7436640 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2020.36.144.22971
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Figure 1Metaizeau classification of radial neck fracture in children
Figure 2Metaizeau intramedullary nail technique
Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS)
| Variable | Definition | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Pain (maximum 45 points) | None | 45 |
| Mild | 30 | |
| Moderate | 15 | |
| Severe | 0 | |
| Range of motion, degrees (maximum 20 points) | Arc >100 | 20 |
| Arc 50-100 | 15 | |
| Arc <50 | 5 | |
| Stability (maximum 10 points) | Stable | 10 |
| Moderately unstable | 5 | |
| Grossly unstable | 0 | |
| Function (maximum 25 points) | Comb hair | 5 |
| Feed onself | 5 | |
| Personal hygiene | 5 | |
| Put on shirt | 5 | |
| Put on shoes | 5 |
Figure 3Metaphyseal fracture of the radial neck
Figure 4epiphyseal separation fracture type II of Salter and Harris
socio-demographic and clinical data of the patients
| Patient | Age (Year) | Sexe | Metaizeau classification | Technique | Follow up (month) | MEPS | Residual angulation (degree) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | F | Grade III | Metaizeau | 12 | Excellent | 0 |
| 2 | 9 | M | Grade III | Metaizeau | 7 | Excellent | 0 |
| 3 | 13 | M | Grade II | Metaizeau | 9 | Excellent | 0 |
| 4 | 5 | M | Grade II | Metaizeau + Leverage | 36 | Good | 5 |
| 5 | 10 | F | Grade III | Metaizeau | 9 | Good | 35 |
| 6 | 5 | F | Grade II | Metaizeau | 7 | Excellent | 0 |
| 7 | 5 | F | Grade II | Metaizeau | 8 | Excellent | 0 |
| 8 | 13 | M | Grade II | Metaizeau | 6 | Excellent | 0 |
| 9 | 7 | F | Grade II | Metaizeau | 12 | Excellent | 0 |
| 10 | 8 | M | Grade II | Metaizeau + Leverage | 12 | Excellent | 0 |
| 11 | 10 | F | Grade IV | Metaizeau + Open surgery | 36 | Poor | 90 |
| 12 | 13 | M | Grade II | Metaizeau | 6 | Excellent | 10 |
| 13 | 9 | F | Grade IV | Metaizeau + Open surgery | 6 | Fair | 40 |
| 14 | 11 | M | Grade II | Metaizeau | 10 | Excellent | 0 |
| 15 | 6 | F | Grade II | Metaizeau | 10 | Excellent | 0 |
| 16 | 9 | F | Grade III | Metaizeau | 7 | Excellent | 0 |
| 17 | 9 | M | Grade IV | Metaizeau | 8 | Fair | 5 |
| 18 | 8 | F | Grade III | Metaizeau + Open surgery | 6 | Excellent | 0 |
| 19 | 12 | M | Grade II | Metaizeau | 10 | Excellent | 0 |
| 20 | 9 | M | Grade II | Metaizeau | 24 | Excellent | 0 |
| 21 | 8 | M | Grade | Metaizeau + Leverage | 10 | Fair | 20 |
| 22 | 6 | F | Grade | Metaizeau | 24 | Fair | 5 |