Literature DB >> 32873024

Effects of acoustic nonlinearity on pulse-echo attenuation coefficient estimation from tissue-mimicking phantoms.

Andres Coila1, Michael L Oelze1.   

Abstract

The ultrasonic attenuation coefficient (ACE) can be used to classify tissue state. Pulse-echo spectral-based attenuation estimation techniques, such as the spectral-log-difference method (SLD), account for beam diffraction effects using a reference phantom having a sound speed close to the sound speed of the sample. Methods like SLD assume linear propagation of ultrasound and do not account for potential acoustic nonlinear distortion of the backscattered power spectra in both sample and reference. In this study, the ACE of a sample was computed and compared using the SLD with two independent references (high attenuating and low attenuating phantoms but with similar B/A values) and over several pressure levels. Both numerical and physical tissue-mimicking phantoms were used in the study. The results indicated that the biases in ACE increased when using a reference having low attenuation, whereas the high attenuating reference produced more consistent ACE. Furthermore, increments in ACE vs input pressure were correlated to the log-ratio of Gol'dberg numbers between the sample and reference (R2=0.979 in simulations and R2=0.734 in experiments). Therefore, the results suggest that to reduce bias in ACE using spectral-based methods, both the sound speed and the Gol'dberg number of the reference phantom should be matched to the sample.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32873024      PMCID: PMC7434466          DOI: 10.1121/10.0001690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Nonlinearity parameter for tissue-mimicking materials.

Authors:  F Dong; E L Madsen; M C MacDonald; J A Zagzebski
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Modeling nonlinear ultrasound propagation in heterogeneous media with power law absorption using a k-space pseudospectral method.

Authors:  Bradley E Treeby; Jiri Jaros; Alistair P Rendell; B T Cox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter coefficient measurements from 2 to 9 MHz.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Timothy A Stiles; Gary R Frank; Ernest L Madsen; Francis Cheng; Ernest J Feleppa; Christopher S Hall; Beom Soo Kim; Paul Lee; William D O'Brien; Michael L Oelze; Balasundar I Raju; K Kirk Shung; Thaddeus A Wilson; Jian R Yuan
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  A theoretical comparison of attenuation measurement techniques from backscattered ultrasound echoes.

Authors:  Yassin Labyed; Timothy A Bigelow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Real-time assessment of the parameter of nonlinearity in tissue using "nonlinear shadowing".

Authors:  M Fatemi; J F Greenleaf
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Attenuation Coefficient Estimation of Normal Placentas.

Authors:  Farah Deeba; Manyou Ma; Mehran Pesteie; Jefferson Terry; Denise Pugash; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Chantal Mayer; Septimiu Salcudean; Robert Rohling
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Prospective Evaluation of Hepatic Steatosis Using Ultrasound Attenuation Imaging in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Proton Density Fat Fraction as the Reference Standard.

Authors:  Sun Kyung Jeon; Jeong Min Lee; Ijin Joo; Jeong Hee Yoon; Dong Ho Lee; Jae Young Lee; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  A Quantitative Ultrasound-Based Multi-Parameter Classifier for Breast Masses.

Authors:  Haidy G Nasief; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Diffraction correction methods for insertion ultrasound attenuation estimation.

Authors:  W Xu; J J Kaufman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Tissue mimicking materials for ultrasound phantoms.

Authors:  E L Madsen; J A Zagzebski; R A Banjavie; R E Jutila
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1978 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation in nonlinear regime using an in situ calibration target.

Authors:  Andres Coila; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.482

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.