Literature DB >> 32871817

A Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic-assisted Colectomy for Obstructive Colon Cancer.

Hiroshi Tamagawa1, Toru Aoyama2, Masakatsu Numata2, Keisuke Kazama2, Yukio Maezawa2, Yosuke Atsumi2, Kentaro Hara2, Shinnosuke Kawahara2, Kazuki Kano2, Norio Yukawa2, Hiroyuki Saeki3, Teni Godai4, Yasushi Rino2, Munetaka Masuda2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: We performed a retrospective multi-center cohort analysis to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery vs. open surgery for obstructive colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 455 patients with colon cancer with ileus underwent surgery at Yokohama City University Hospital and four related institutions from April 2000 to March 2016.
RESULTS: There were 414 cases in the open surgery group and 41 cases in the laparoscopic surgery group with no marked differences in the gender or age. The postoperative complication rate, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, was lower in the laparoscopic group compared to the open surgery group. The postoperative hospital stay was 16 days in the open surgery group and 9 days in the laparoscopic surgery group (p=0.004). Among the various factors examined, the operation approach was identified as a statistically significant independent risk factor for postoperative complications (p=0.015).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative treatment for colon cancer with ileus and elective laparoscopic surgery are thought to be useful for achieving curative treatment, avoiding colostomy, and shortening the length of hospital stay. Copyright
© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Short-term outcomes; laparoscopic-assisted colectomy; obstructive colon cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32871817      PMCID: PMC7652504          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  18 in total

1.  Endolaparoscopic left hemicolectomy and synchronous laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for obstructive carcinoma of the descending colon and renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Simon S M Ng; Raymond Y C Yiu; Jimmy C M Li; Chi Kwok Chan; Chi Fai Ng; James Y W Lau
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.878

2.  The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.

Authors:  Pierre A Clavien; Jeffrey Barkun; Michelle L de Oliveira; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Daniel Dindo; Richard D Schulick; Eduardo de Santibañes; Juan Pekolj; Ksenija Slankamenac; Claudio Bassi; Rolf Graf; René Vonlanthen; Robert Padbury; John L Cameron; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Endolaparoscopic approach vs conventional open surgery in the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hester Yui Shan Cheung; Chi Chiu Chung; Wilson Wen Chieng Tsang; James Cheuk Hoo Wong; Kevin Kwok Kay Yau; Michael Ka Wah Li
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-12

4.  Long-term results of palliative stent placement for acute malignant colonic obstruction.

Authors:  M W van den Berg; M Ledeboer; M G W Dijkgraaf; P Fockens; F ter Borg; J E van Hooft
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer in the emergency setting.

Authors:  Ik Yong Kim; Bo Ra Kim; Young Wan Kim
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Patient preferences and quality of life associated with colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  J A Dominitz; D Provenzale
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  WallFlex colonic stent placement for management of malignant colonic obstruction: a prospective study at two centers.

Authors:  Alessandro Repici; Giuseppe De Caro; Carmelo Luigiano; Carlo Fabbri; Nico Pagano; Paoletta Preatoni; Silvio Danese; Lorenzo Fuccio; Lorenzo Fucci; Pierluigi Consolo; Alberto Malesci; Nicola D'Imperio; Vincenzo Cennamo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 8.  Quality of life in colorectal cancer. Stoma vs. nonstoma patients.

Authors:  M A Sprangers; B G Taal; N K Aaronson; A te Velde
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  [Colostomy vs self-expanding metallic stents: comparison of the two techniques in acute tumoral left colonic obstruction].

Authors:  P Baqué; P Chevallier; F Karimdjee Solihi; M A Rahili; A Iannelli; E I Benizri; J-L Bernard; J-M Bereder; F Oddo; B Padovani; J Gugenheim; D Benchimol; A Bourgeon
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

10.  Long-term outcomes of palliative colonic stenting versus emergency surgery for acute proximal malignant colonic obstruction: a multicenter trial.

Authors:  Ali Siddiqui; Natalie Cosgrove; Linda H Yan; Daniel Brandt; Raymond Janowski; Ankush Kalra; Tingting Zhan; Todd H Baron; Allesandro Repici; Linda Jo Taylor; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Bowel Obstruction Due to Stenotic Sigmoid Colon Cancer in a 32-Year-Old Patient Presenting in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy: A Case Report of an Interval Surgical Approach.

Authors:  Daniel Antonio Morales Santana; Zoltan Czigany; Franziska A Meister; Georg J Wiltberger; Rebecca Caspers; Christian Enzensberger; Elmar Stickeler; Ulf P Neumann; Andreas Lambertz
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2022-05-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.