Literature DB >> 32871586

Long-term results of PET-guided radiation in patients with advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP.

Ciara L Freeman1,2, Kerry J Savage1,2, Diego R Villa1,2, David W Scott1,2, Line Srour3, Alina S Gerrie1,2, Maura J Brown4, Graham W Slack5, Pedro Farinha5, Brian Skinnider5, James Morris6, François Bénard7, Christina Aquino-Parsons6, Andrea Lo6, Tom Pickles6, Don C Wilson7, Petter Tonseth7, Joseph M Connors1,2, Laurie H Sehn1,2.   

Abstract

Consolidative radiation therapy (RT) for advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains controversial, with routine practice continuing to include RT in patients with initial bulky disease or residual masses. Positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography is a sensitive modality for detecting the presence of residual disease at the end of treatment (EOT). A PET-guided approach to selectively administering RT has been the policy in British Columbia since 2005. Patients with advanced-stage DLBCL diagnosed from 1 January 2005 to 1 March 2017 and treated with at least 6 cycles of R-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone plus rituximab), who underwent EOT PET, were included in this analysis. Those with complete metabolic response (PET-negative [PET-NEG]) were observed; those with PET-positive (PET-POS) scans were offered consolidative RT, when feasible. Of the patient records reviewed, 723 were identified, with median follow-up of 4.3 years: 517 (72%) were PET-NEG; 206 (28%) were PET-POS. Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) at 3 years were 83% vs 56% and 87% vs 64%, in patients with PET-NEG and PET-POS scans, respectively. PET-POS patients with nonprogressing disease treated with consolidative RT (109 and 206; 53%) had outcomes approaching those of PET-NEG patients, with 3-year estimates of 76% and 80% for TTP and OS. PET-NEG patients who had bulky disease (≥10 cm) at diagnosis had outcomes indistinguishable from those without bulk, despite the omission of RT. These data suggest that patients with advanced-stage DLBCL who are PET-NEG at EOT and receive no RT have excellent outcomes. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET can reliably guide selective administration of consolidative RT, even in patients with initially bulky disease.
© 2021 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 32871586     DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020005846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  9 in total

1.  The prognostic value of end-of-treatment FDG-PET/CT in diffuse large B cell lymphoma: comparison of visual Deauville criteria and a lesion-to-liver SUVmax ratio-based evaluation system.

Authors:  Ying-He Li; Yu-Mo Zhao; Yong-Luo Jiang; Si Tang; Mei-Ting Chen; Zi-Zheng Xiao; Wei Fan; Ying-Ying Hu; Xu Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Two-Year Event-Free Survival Prediction in DLBCL Patients Based on In Vivo Radiomics and Clinical Parameters.

Authors:  Zsombor Ritter; László Papp; Katalin Zámbó; Zoltán Tóth; Dániel Dezső; Dániel Sándor Veres; Domokos Máthé; Ferenc Budán; Éva Karádi; Anett Balikó; László Pajor; Árpád Szomor; Erzsébet Schmidt; Hussain Alizadeh
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 3.  Role of Radiomics-Based Baseline PET/CT Imaging in Lymphoma: Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Response Assessment.

Authors:  Han Jiang; Ang Li; Zhongyou Ji; Mei Tian; Hong Zhang
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.484

4.  PET2 response associated with survival in newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results of two independent prospective cohorts.

Authors:  Sanjal H Desai; Levi Pederson; Betsy LaPlant; Raphael Mwangi; Matthew Maurer; Jason R Young; William R Macon; Rebecca L King; Yucai Wang; James R Cerhan; Andrew Feldman; David J Inwards; Ivana Micallef; Patrick Johnston; Luis F Porrata; Stephen M Ansell; Thomas M Habermann; Thomas E Witzig; Grzegorz S Nowakowski
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 9.812

5.  Moving the goalposts while scoring-the dilemma posed by new PET technologies.

Authors:  Julian M M Rogasch; Ronald Boellaard; Lucy Pike; Peter Borchmann; Peter Johnson; Jürgen Wolf; Sally F Barrington; Carsten Kobe
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  A comparison of FDG PET/MR and PET/CT for staging, response assessment, and prognostic imaging biomarkers in lymphoma.

Authors:  Trine Husby; Håkon Johansen; Trond Bogsrud; Kari Vekseth Hustad; Birte Veslemøy Evensen; Ronald Boellard; Guro F Giskeødegård; Unn-Merete Fagerli; Live Eikenes
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.673

7.  Salvage radiotherapy is associated with durable response for a subset of patients with limited-stage refractory DLBCL.

Authors:  Jemima H Miller; Michael Gilbertson; Michael P MacManus; Andrew Wirth; Stephen S Opat; Gareth P Gregory
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-12-14

8.  Role of radiation therapy in primary tonsil large B cell lymphoma: a SEER-based analysis.

Authors:  Jing Jia; Wenming Chen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 9.  DLBCL 1L-What to Expect beyond R-CHOP?

Authors:  Maike Stegemann; Sophy Denker; Clemens A Schmitt
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 6.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.