B M G Snijders1, M H Emmelot-Vonk2, E T D Souwer3, H A H Kaasjager4, F van den Bos2. 1. Department of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. b.m.g.snijders@gmail.com. 2. Department of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: It is important to identify which older patients attending the emergency department are at risk of adverse outcomes to introduce preventive interventions. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of a shortened screening instrument based on the Dutch national Safety Management System [Veiligheidsmanagementsysteem (VMS)] guidelines for adverse outcomes in older emergency department patients. METHODS: A cohort study was performed including patients aged 70 years or older who visited the emergency department. Adverse outcomes included hospital admission, return emergency department visits within 30 days, and 90-day mortality. The prognostic value of the VMS-score was assessed for these adverse events and, in addition, a prediction model was developed for 90-day mortality. RESULTS: A high VMS-score was independently associated with an increased risk of hospital admission [OR 2.26 (95% CI 1.32-3.86)] and 90-day mortality [HR 2.48 (95% CI 1.31-4.71)]. The individual VMS-questions regarding history of delirium and help in activities of daily living were associated with these outcomes as well. A prediction model for 90-day mortality was developed and showed satisfactory calibration and good discrimination [AUC 0.80 (95% CI 0.72-0.87)]. A cut-off point that selected 30% of patients at the highest risk yielded a sensitivity of 67.4%, a specificity of 75.3%, a positive predictive value of 28.5%, and a negative predictive value of 94.1%. CONCLUSION: The shortened VMS-based screening instrument showed to be of good prognostic value for hospitalization and 90-day mortality. The prediction model for mortality showed promising results and will be further validated and optimized.
PURPOSE: It is important to identify which older patients attending the emergency department are at risk of adverse outcomes to introduce preventive interventions. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of a shortened screening instrument based on the Dutch national Safety Management System [Veiligheidsmanagementsysteem (VMS)] guidelines for adverse outcomes in older emergency department patients. METHODS: A cohort study was performed including patients aged 70 years or older who visited the emergency department. Adverse outcomes included hospital admission, return emergency department visits within 30 days, and 90-day mortality. The prognostic value of the VMS-score was assessed for these adverse events and, in addition, a prediction model was developed for 90-day mortality. RESULTS: A high VMS-score was independently associated with an increased risk of hospital admission [OR 2.26 (95% CI 1.32-3.86)] and 90-day mortality [HR 2.48 (95% CI 1.31-4.71)]. The individual VMS-questions regarding history of delirium and help in activities of daily living were associated with these outcomes as well. A prediction model for 90-day mortality was developed and showed satisfactory calibration and good discrimination [AUC 0.80 (95% CI 0.72-0.87)]. A cut-off point that selected 30% of patients at the highest risk yielded a sensitivity of 67.4%, a specificity of 75.3%, a positive predictive value of 28.5%, and a negative predictive value of 94.1%. CONCLUSION: The shortened VMS-based screening instrument showed to be of good prognostic value for hospitalization and 90-day mortality. The prediction model for mortality showed promising results and will be further validated and optimized.
Authors: Frederike M M Oud; Sophia E J A de Rooij; Arend J Arends; Marielle H Emmelot-Vonk; René J F Melis; Simon P Mooijaart; Hanna C Willems; Barbara C van Munster Journal: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd Date: 2019-11-12
Authors: Rose Galvin; Yannick Gilleit; Emma Wallace; Gráinne Cousins; Manon Bolmer; Timothy Rainer; Susan M Smith; Tom Fahey Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Carmen S van Dam; Marijke C Trappenburg; Mike J L Peters; Laura C Blomaard; Jacinta A Lucke; Simon P Mooijaart Journal: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd Date: 2019-11-14
Authors: J de Gelder; J A Lucke; B de Groot; A J Fogteloo; S Anten; K Mesri; E W Steyerberg; C Heringhaus; G J Blauw; S P Mooijaart Journal: Neth J Med Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 1.422
Authors: J de Gelder; E Haenen; J A Lucke; H G Klop; L C Blomaard; R A J Smit; K Mesri; B de Groot; A J Fogteloo; S Anten; G J Blauw; S P Mooijaart Journal: Neth J Med Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 1.422
Authors: Frederike M M Oud; Sophia E J A de Rooij; Truus Schuurman; Karlijn M Duijvelaar; Barbara C van Munster Journal: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd Date: 2015
Authors: Laura C Blomaard; Carolien M J van der Linden; Jessica M van der Bol; Steffy W M Jansen; Harmke A Polinder-Bos; Hanna C Willems; Jan Festen; Dennis G Barten; Anke J Borgers; Jeannet C Bos; Frederiek van den Bos; Esther J M de Brouwer; Floor J A van Deudekom; Suzanne C van Dijk; Mariëlle H Emmelot-Vonk; Raya E S Geels; Esther M M van de Glind; Bas de Groot; Liesbeth Hempenius; Ad M Kamper; Linda M Kampschreur; Marre M M de Koning; Geert Labots; Roy Looman; Jacinta A Lucke; Huub A A M Maas; Francesco U S Mattace-Raso; Rachida El Moussaoui; Barbara C van Munster; Kees van Nieuwkoop; Leanne Ble Oosterwijk; Marlies Em Regtuijt; Sarah H M Robben; Rikje Ruiter; Aisha M Salarbaks; Henrike J Schouten; Orla M Smit; Rosalinde A L Smits; Petra E Spies; Ralph Vreeswijk; Oscar J de Vries; Marjolein A Wijngaarden; Caroline E Wyers; Simon P Mooijaart Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2021-01-30 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Laura C Blomaard; Carolien M J van der Linden; Jessica M van der Bol; Steffy W M Jansen; Harmke A Polinder-Bos; Hanna C Willems; Jan Festen; Dennis G Barten; Anke J Borgers; Jeannet C Bos; Frederiek van den Bos; Esther J M de Brouwer; Floor J A van Deudekom; Suzanne C van Dijk; Mariëlle H Emmelot-Vonk; Raya E S Geels; Esther M M van de Glind; Bas de Groot; Liesbeth Hempenius; Ad M Kamper; Linda M Kampschreur; Marre M M de Koning; Geert Labots; Roy Looman; Jacinta A Lucke; Huub A A M Maas; Francesco U S Mattace-Raso; Rachida El Moussaoui; Barbara C van Munster; Cees van Nieuwkoop; Leanne B L E Oosterwijk; Marlies E M Regtuijt; Sarah H M Robben; Rikje Ruiter; Aisha M Salarbaks; Henrike J Schouten; Orla M Smit; Rosalinde A L Smits; Petra E Spies; Ralph Vreeswijk; Oscar J de Vries; Marjolein A Wijngaarden; Caroline E Wyers; Simon P Mooijaart Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 10.668