| Literature DB >> 32870378 |
Joseph Brook1, Min-Young Kim1, Simos Koutsoftidis2, David Pitcher1, Danya Agha-Jaffar1, Annam Sufi1, Catherine Jenkins1, Konstantinos Tzortzis1, Suofeiya Ma1, Richard J Jabbour1, Charles Houston1, Balvinder S Handa1, Xinyang Li1, Ji-Jian Chow1, Anand Jothidasan3, Poppy Bristow4, Justin Perkins4, Sian Harding1, Anil A Bharath2, Fu Siong Ng1, Nicholas S Peters1, Chris D Cantwell2, Rasheda A Chowdhury5.
Abstract
We describe a human and large animal Langendorff experimental apparatus for live electrophysiological studies and measure the electrophysiological changes due to gap junction uncoupling in human and porcine hearts. The resultant ex vivo intact human and porcine model can bridge the translational gap between smaller simple laboratory models and clinical research. In particular, electrophysiological models would benefit from the greater myocardial mass of a large heart due to its effects on far-field signal, electrode contact issues and motion artefacts, consequently more closely mimicking the clinical setting. Porcine (n = 9) and human (n = 4) donor hearts were perfused on a custom-designed Langendorff apparatus. Epicardial electrograms were collected at 16 sites across the left atrium and left ventricle. A total of 1 mM of carbenoxolone was administered at 5 ml/min to induce cellular uncoupling, and then recordings were repeated at the same sites. Changes in electrogram characteristics were analysed. We demonstrate the viability of a controlled ex vivo model of intact porcine and human hearts for electrophysiology with pharmacological modulation. Carbenoxolone reduces cellular coupling and changes contact electrogram features. The time from stimulus artefact to (-dV/dt)max increased between baseline and carbenoxolone (47.9 ± 4.1-67.2 ± 2.7 ms) indicating conduction slowing. The features with the largest percentage change between baseline and carbenoxolone were fractionation + 185.3%, endpoint amplitude - 106.9%, S-endpoint gradient + 54.9%, S point - 39.4%, RS ratio + 38.6% and (-dV/dt)max - 20.9%. The physiological relevance of this methodological tool is that it provides a model to further investigate pharmacologically induced pro-arrhythmic substrates.Entities:
Keywords: Carbenoxolone; Contact electrogram; Ex vivo model; Gap junction uncoupling; Isolated heart; Langendorff
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32870378 PMCID: PMC7476990 DOI: 10.1007/s00424-020-02446-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pflugers Arch ISSN: 0031-6768 Impact factor: 3.657
The age, sex, reason for rejection and cause of death for all of the human donor hearts (n = 4)
| Heart | Donor age | Donor sex | Reason for rejection | Cause of death |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 32 | Female | History of meningitis | Haemorrhage |
| 9 | 36 | Male | High lactate | Drowning |
| 11 | 51 | Male | Poor function | Intracranial bleed |
| 13 | 20 | Male | Malignancy found in pancreas | Traffic accident (unrestrained passenger) |
Fig. 1a Diagram of the Langendorff apparatus. Blue: tubing for the physiological solution. Red: tubing for the surrounding heating solution. b The Langendorff apparatus, pump and aortic cannula feeding into a porcine heart. c 4 × 4 HD grid catheter by Abbott Medical, used to record the electrograms from the left ventricle and atrium. d The locations on the epicardial surface from where the HD grid catheter was placed to perform the pacing protocol. Positions 1–12 are on the epicardial surface of the left ventricle and positions 13–16 are on the epicardial surface of the left atrium. e A photograph of a human heart taken during the pacing protocol at BL to record the location of the catheter when the EGMs were gathered. In this photograph, the catheter is at position 3
The experiment duration for all whole heart Langendorff experiments performed (n = 13)
| Heart | Duration of experiment (minutes) | Type of heart |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 89 | Porcine |
| 2 | 88 | Porcine |
| 3 | 117 | Porcine |
| 4 | 116 | Porcine |
| 5 | 116 | Porcine |
| 6* | 34 | Human donor |
| 7 | 102 | Porcine |
| 8 | 90 | Porcine |
| 9 | 85 | Human donor |
| 10 | 88 | Porcine |
| 11 | 78 | Human donor |
| 12 | 98 | Porcine |
| 13 | 182 | Human donor |
Fig. 2a Example ECG (i) when initially restarted. (ii) Reduction in ischemic features following stabilisation. b Extracted unipolar EGM traces from porcine and human hearts, taken at baseline. The porcine and human recordings were made from the same anatomical locations in the left ventricle and left atrium
Fig. 3a Electrogram traces from a porcine and human donor heart, recorded from the same catheter position and paced at 750 cl. (i) The (-dV/dt)max was measured 114.8 ms after the pacing stimulus, recorded with a porcine heart at BL. (ii) The (-dV/dt)max was measured 164.1 ms after the pacing stimulus, recorded with a porcine heart after 50 ml of 1 mM CBX administered over 10 min. (iii) The (-dV/dt)max was measured 108.6 ms after the pacing stimulus, recorded with a human donor heart at BL. b Dose response curve for CBX. The mean time delay and standard deviation from the pacing stimulus to the (-dV/dt)max, measured from all electrodes in contact with the myocardium. The progression of gap junction uncoupling caused by the administered CBX can be seen by the increased time delay from the pacing stimulus to the (-dV/dt)max of the myocardium as more CBX is administered
The mean, standard deviation and percentage change of each feature at BL and with CBX. T tests have been performed to determine if the changes in features are statistically significant
| Feature | BL mean (SD) | CBX mean (SD) | Percentage change (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RS interval | 182.01 (1093.43) | 149.96 (1061.53) | 0.42 | − 17.61 |
| QR interval | 68.59 (154.71) | 63.21 (164.99) | 0.34 | − 7.84 |
| QS interval | 250.60 (1151.87) | 213.17 (1159.46) | 0.37 | − 14.94 |
| EGM duration | 292.98 (1155.80) | 265.20 (1163.59) | 0.51 | − 9.48 |
| Q point | 0.81 (0.96) | 0.92(1.05) | 0.002* | 13.86 |
| R point | 3.13 (7.92) | 2.55 (2.12) | 0.03* | − 18.60 |
| S point | − 3.40 (3.06) | − 4.74 (2.66) | − 39.40 | |
| Endpoint amplitude | − 0.24 (2.02) | − 0.50 (2.14) | 0.0005* | − 106.85 |
| RS gradient | − 0.31 (1.01) | − 0.36 (0.33) | 0.11 | − 17.79 |
| QR gradient | 0.06 (0.24) | 0.06 (0.10) | 0.91 | − 1.49 |
| S-endpoint gradient | 0.17 (0.29) | 0.26 (1.40) | 54.93 | |
| Fractionation index | 29.27 (89.76) | 83.52 (327.44) | 185.30 | |
| R width | 159.59 (613.57) | 138.19 (635.67) | 0.34 | − 13.41 |
| S width | 133.39 (553.10 | 127.01 (127.01) | 0.75 | − 4.78 |
| RS ratio | − 1.35 (1.81) | − 0.83 (1.06) | 38.58 | |
| RS width ratio | 1.95 (4.28) | 1.97 (8.06) | 0.91 | 1.04 |
| RS width/EGM duration | 0.50 (0.21) | 0.48 (0.23) | 0.005* | − 4.30 |
| (-dV/dt) max | 2.17 (7.83) | 1.72 (2.01) | 0.08 | − 20.94 |
| Amplitude | 6.53 (9.39) | 7.28 (3.21) | 0.02* | 11.58 |
Fig. 4a The mean and SD of each feature extracted at BL and with CBX added. b The percentage change in EGM features from BL following the administration of 1 mM CBX