Literature DB >> 32869716

Midterm Results of Retrograde In Situ Needle Fenestration During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Aortic Arch Pathologies.

Mingyao Luo1,2, Kun Fang1, Bowen Fan1, Quanming Li3, Ming Li3, Hao He3, Xin Li3, Yuanyuan Guo2, Yunfei Xue1, Jiawei Zhao1, Tun Wang3, Chenzi Yang3, Jiehua Li3, Christoph A Nienaber4, Chang Shu1,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of the in situ needle fenestration (ISNF) technique for reconstruction of the left subclavian artery (LSA) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of complicated aortic arch pathologies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted from January 2014 to December 2019 of 50 patients (mean age 60.2±11.1; 45 men) who underwent ISNF to revascularize the LSA during TEVAR. Twenty-one of the patients also required revascularization of the left common carotid artery (LCCA; n=19) and innominate artery (IA; n=2) using physician-modified in vitro fenestration. Overall, 73 supra-aortic branches were targeted for revascularization.
RESULTS: ISNF was successful in 48 patients (96%); one LSA could not be stented and a tortuous LSA prevented the needle from fenestrating the graft. No perioperative major adverse event occurred. There were no type I and 4 type III endoleaks (8%), 3 of which occurred among the first 20 cases. Types II and IV endoleaks were found in 3 (6%) and 6 (12%) cases, respectively; all disappeared during a median follow-up of 15 months (range 3-66). One death (2%) occurred within 12 months due to cerebral hemorrhage. Two patients (4%) required open reinterventions at 6 and 62 months.
CONCLUSION: ISNF for revascularization of the LSA during TEVAR seems to be feasible with acceptable midterm outcomes. The learning curve and evolving patient selection criteria affected technical success, complications, and the need for reinterventions. Long-term durability requires further evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic arch; in situ fenestration; innominate artery; left common carotid artery; left subclavian artery; physician-modified stent-graft; revascularization; supra-aortic branches; thoracic endovascular aortic repair; thoracic stent-graft

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32869716     DOI: 10.1177/1526602820953406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  4 in total

1.  First-in-Human Implantation of Gutter-Free Design Stent-Graft in in situ Fenestration TEVAR for Aortic Arch Pathology.

Authors:  Xin Li; Chang Shu; Lunchang Wang; Quanming Li; Kun Fang; Mingyao Luo; Weichang Zhang; Yang Zhou; Haiyang Zhou
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-30

Review 2.  Type 1A Endoleak after TEVAR in the Aortic Arch: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Lucia Scurto; Nicolò Peluso; Federico Pascucci; Simona Sica; Francesca De Nigris; Marco Filipponi; Fabrizio Minelli; Tommaso Donati; Giovanni Tinelli; Yamume Tshomba
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-08-04

3.  Single-center experience with a unibody single-branched stent graft for zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Xiang Kong; Peng Ruan; Jiquan Yu; Tianshu Chu; Lei Gao; Hui Jiang; Jianjun Ge
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-09

4.  Comparison of techniques for left subclavian artery preservation during thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of both endovascular and surgical revascularization.

Authors:  Yuchong Zhang; Xinsheng Xie; Ye Yuan; Chengkai Hu; Enci Wang; Yufei Zhao; Peng Lin; Zheyun Li; Fandi Mo; Weiguo Fu; Lixin Wang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.