Literature DB >> 32869448

Lakes in the era of global change: moving beyond single-lake thinking in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services.

Jani Heino1, Janne Alahuhta2, Luis Mauricio Bini3, Yongjiu Cai4, Anna-Stiina Heiskanen1, Seppo Hellsten1, Pirkko Kortelainen1,5, Niina Kotamäki1, Kimmo T Tolonen1,6, Petteri Vihervaara5, Annika Vilmi1, David G Angeler7,8.   

Abstract

The Anthropocene presents formidable threats to freshwater ecosystems. Lakes are especially vulnerable and important at the same time. They cover only a small area worldwide but harbour high levels of biodiversity and contribute disproportionately to ecosystem services. Lakes differ with respect to their general type (e.g. land-locked, drainage, floodplain and large lakes) and position in the landscape (e.g. highland versus lowland lakes), which contribute to the dynamics of these systems. Lakes should be generally viewed as 'meta-systems', whereby biodiversity is strongly affected by species dispersal, and ecosystem dynamics are contributed by the flow of matter and substances among locations in a broader waterscape context. Lake connectivity in the waterscape and position in the landscape determine the degree to which a lake is prone to invasion by non-native species and accumulation of harmful substances. Highly connected lakes low in the landscape accumulate nutrients and pollutants originating from ecosystems higher in the landscape. The monitoring and restoration of lake biodiversity and ecosystem services should consider the fact that a high degree of dynamism is present at local, regional and global scales. However, local and regional monitoring may be plagued by the unpredictability of ecological phenomena, hindering adaptive management of lakes. Although monitoring data are increasingly becoming available to study responses of lakes to global change, we still lack suitable integration of models for entire waterscapes. Research across disciplinary boundaries is needed to address the challenges that lakes face in the Anthropocene because they may play an increasingly important role in harbouring unique aquatic biota as well as providing ecosystem goods and services in the future.
© 2020 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biological diversity; ecosystem change; fresh waters; meta-system; monitoring; resilience; restoration

Year:  2020        PMID: 32869448     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  5 in total

1.  Global hydro-environmental lake characteristics at high spatial resolution.

Authors:  Bernhard Lehner; Mathis L Messager; Maartje C Korver; Simon Linke
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.444

2.  Human pressure drives biodiversity-multifunctionality relationships in large Neotropical wetlands.

Authors:  Dieison A Moi; Fernando M Lansac-Tôha; Gustavo Q Romero; Thadeu Sobral-Souza; Bradley J Cardinale; Pavel Kratina; Daniel M Perkins; Franco Teixeira de Mello; Erik Jeppesen; Jani Heino; Fábio A Lansac-Tôha; Luiz F M Velho; Roger P Mormul
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 19.100

3.  Environmental DNA captures native and non-native fish community variations across the lentic and lotic systems of a megacity.

Authors:  Shan Zhang; Yitao Zheng; Aibin Zhan; Chunxia Dong; Jindong Zhao; Meng Yao
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Spatiotemporal variability in Swedish lake ecosystems.

Authors:  Tarsha Eason; Ahjond Garmestani; David G Angeler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Protist Diversity and Metabolic Strategy in Freshwater Lakes Are Shaped by Trophic State and Watershed Land Use on a Continental Scale.

Authors:  Rebecca E Garner; Susanne A Kraemer; Vera E Onana; Yannick Huot; Irene Gregory-Eaves; David A Walsh
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 7.324

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.