Literature DB >> 32868871

Inbred lab mice are not isogenic: genetic variation within inbred strains used to infer the mutation rate per nucleotide site.

Jobran Chebib1, Benjamin C Jackson2, Eugenio López-Cortegano2, Diethard Tautz3, Peter D Keightley4.   

Abstract

For over a century, inbred mice have been used in many areas of genetics research to gain insight into the genetic variation underlying traits of interest. The generalizability of any genetic research study in inbred mice is dependent upon all individual mice being genetically identical, which in turn is dependent on the breeding designs of companies that supply inbred mice to researchers. Here, we compare whole-genome sequences from individuals of four commonly used inbred strains that were procured from either the colony nucleus or from a production colony (which can be as many as ten generations removed from the nucleus) of a large commercial breeder, in order to investigate the extent and nature of genetic variation within and between individuals. We found that individuals within strains are not isogenic, and there are differences in the levels of genetic variation that are explained by differences in the genetic distance from the colony nucleus. In addition, we employ a novel approach to mutation rate estimation based on the observed genetic variation and the expected site frequency spectrum at equilibrium, given a fully inbred breeding design. We find that it provides a reasonable per nucleotide mutation rate estimate when mice come from the colony nucleus (~7.9 × 10-9 in C3H/HeN), but substantially inflated estimates when mice come from production colonies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32868871      PMCID: PMC7852876          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-020-00361-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  25 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of quantitative trait loci that influence animal behavior.

Authors:  Jonathan Flint
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  2003-01

2.  A new standard genetic map for the laboratory mouse.

Authors:  Allison Cox; Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell; Beth L Dumont; Yueming Ding; Jordana Tzenova Bell; Gudrun A Brockmann; Jon E Wergedal; Carol Bult; Beverly Paigen; Jonathan Flint; Shirng-Wern Tsaih; Gary A Churchill; Karl W Broman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Repbase Update, a database of repetitive elements in eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Weidong Bao; Kenji K Kojima; Oleksiy Kohany
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2015-06-02

4.  Inbred mouse strains and genetic stability: a review.

Authors:  J Casellas
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Genealogies of mouse inbred strains.

Authors:  J A Beck; S Lloyd; M Hafezparast; M Lennon-Pierce; J T Eppig; M F Festing; E M Fisher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Distributions of selectively constrained sites and deleterious mutation rates in the hominid and murid genomes.

Authors:  Lél Eory; Daniel L Halligan; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  How pure are inbred strains of mice?

Authors:  D W Bailey
Journal:  Immunol Today       Date:  1982-08

8.  Significant Strain Variation in the Mutation Spectra of Inbred Laboratory Mice.

Authors:  Beth L Dumont
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  SLiM 3: Forward Genetic Simulations Beyond the Wright-Fisher Model.

Authors:  Benjamin C Haller; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Tissue-specific mutation accumulation in human adult stem cells during life.

Authors:  Francis Blokzijl; Joep de Ligt; Myrthe Jager; Valentina Sasselli; Sophie Roerink; Nobuo Sasaki; Meritxell Huch; Sander Boymans; Ewart Kuijk; Pjotr Prins; Isaac J Nijman; Inigo Martincorena; Michal Mokry; Caroline L Wiegerinck; Sabine Middendorp; Toshiro Sato; Gerald Schwank; Edward E S Nieuwenhuis; Monique M A Verstegen; Luc J W van der Laan; Jeroen de Jonge; Jan N M IJzermans; Robert G Vries; Marc van de Wetering; Michael R Stratton; Hans Clevers; Edwin Cuppen; Ruben van Boxtel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Meiotic drive in house mice: mechanisms, consequences, and insights for human biology.

Authors:  Uma P Arora; Beth L Dumont
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.620

2.  Interfering With Contextual Fear Memories by Post-reactivation Administration of Propranolol in Mice: A Series of Null Findings.

Authors:  Wouter R Cox; Leonidas Faliagkas; Amber Besseling; Rolinka J van der Loo; Sabine Spijker; Merel Kindt; Priyanka Rao-Ruiz
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.617

3.  Behavioral characterization of withdrawal following chronic voluntary ethanol consumption via intermittent two-bottle choice points to different susceptibility categories.

Authors:  Natalia A Quijano Cardé; Mariella De Biasi
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.928

4.  Major oscillations in spontaneous home-cage activity in C57BL/6 mice housed under constant conditions.

Authors:  Karin Pernold; Eric Rullman; Brun Ulfhake
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A novel CD4 knockout mouse strain with a spontaneous frameshift mutation in the CD4 locus.

Authors:  Mathangi Janakiraman; Shin-Young Na; Gurumoorthy Krishnamoorthy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  A roadmap for translational cancer glycoimmunology at single cell resolution.

Authors:  Andreia Peixoto; Andreia Miranda; Lúcio Lara Santos; José Alexandre Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-04-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.