Literature DB >> 32868333

Natural Polymorphisms in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Conferring Resistance to Delamanid in Drug-Naive Patients.

Martina L Reichmuth1, Rico Hömke2,3, Kathrin Zürcher1, Peter Sander2,3, Anchalee Avihingsanon4, Jimena Collantes5, Chloé Loiseau6,7, Sonia Borrell6,7, Miriam Reinhard6,7, Robert J Wilkinson8,9,10, Marcel Yotebieng11,12, Lukas Fenner1, Erik C Böttger2,3, Sebastien Gagneux6,7, Matthias Egger1,13, Peter M Keller14,3,15.   

Abstract

Mutations in the genes of the F420 signaling pathway of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, including dnn, fgd1, fbiA, fbiB, fbiC, and fbiD, can lead to delamanid resistance. We searched for such mutations among 129 M. tuberculosis strains from Asia, South America, and Africa using whole-genome sequencing; 70 (54%) strains had at least one mutation in one of the genes. For 10 strains with mutations, we determined the MIC of delamanid. We found one strain from a delamanid-naive patient carrying the natural polymorphism Tyr29del (ddn) that was associated with a critical delamanid MIC.
Copyright © 2020 Reichmuth et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mycobacterium tuberculosiszzm321990; delamanid; drug resistance; mutations; natural polymorphism; resistance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32868333      PMCID: PMC7577131          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00513-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


TEXT

In 2014, the new antituberculosis (anti-TB) drug delamanid (also known as OPC-67683, or Deltyba) was introduced (1). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the administration of delamanid if a standard effective drug regimen cannot be prescribed due to drug toxicity or resistance (2, 3). Thus, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) conditionally approved delamanid for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB (1, 3, 4). Of note, 6 years after its market launch, robust and widely accepted breakpoints that define susceptibility and resistance to delamanid still do not exist (5). The few available studies suggest a critical MIC between 0.125 mg/liter and 0.2 mg/liter, and an epidemiological cutoff value (ECOFF) of 0.04 mg/liter (6–9). This ECOFF is in line with the WHO technical report (10). Delamanid is a drug of the bicyclic nitroimidazole class with potent anti-TB activity (1, 11). It is a prodrug that is activated by the deazaflavin (F420)-dependent nitroreductase (ddn) through hydride transfer, forming unstable intermediates, which in turn lead to the formation of reactive nitrogen species (nitric oxide, nitrous acid) (12, 13). Activated delamanid thus has a dual bactericidal mode of action: the primary decomposition product prevents mycolic acid synthesis, while the reactive nitrogen species cause respiratory poisoning (12–15). Loss-of-function mutations in ddn or one of the genes encoding the five coenzymes (fgd1, fbiA, fbiB, fbiC, and fbiD) have been proposed as a mechanism of resistance to delamanid (12, 13, 16, 17). In vitro, the frequencies of delamanid resistance-conferring mutations in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis laboratory strain H37Rv and in Mycobacterium bovis range from 2.51 × 10−5 to 6.44 × 10−6 (13). Previous studies have found several resistance-conferring mutations, including Leu107Pro (ddn), 51–101del (ddn), Trp88STOP (ddn), Gly81Asp (ddn), Gly81Ser (ddn), Gly53Asp (ddn), c.146_147insC (fgd1), Gln88Glu (fgd1), Lys250STOP (fbiA), Arg175His (fbiA), and Val318Ile (fibC) (6–8, 18–22). This multicenter study has been described in detail elsewhere and is part of the work of the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) (23). We identified putative delamanid resistance-conferring mutations in M. tuberculosis strains from TB patients living with HIV (PLWH) and delamanid-naive, HIV-negative TB patients by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and MIC determination. We collected information on the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who were recruited between 2013 and 2016 in Peru, Thailand, Côte d’Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Kenya, and South Africa (24, 25). The Cantonal Ethics Committee in Bern, Switzerland, and local institutional review boards approved the study. Written informed consent was obtained at all locations, except in South Africa, where consent was not required for archived samples. The sequencing pipeline has been described previously (25). In brief, M. tuberculosis DNA was extracted and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). For the analysis, we used the well-established pipeline TBprofiler (https://github.com/jodyphelan/TBProfiler) (26, 27). It aligns short reads to the M. tuberculosis reference strain H37Rv (GenBank accession no. NC_000962.3) with bowtie2 (v2.3.5), BWA (v0.7.17), or minimap2 (v2.16) and then calls variants with SAMtools (v1.9) (28–31). To identify putative delamanid resistance-conferring mutations, we analyzed F420 genes (ddn, fgd1, fbiA, fbiB, fbiC, and fbiD) with variant frequencies of ≥75%. A subset of M. tuberculosis strains with at least one mutation in the F420 genes was recultured in liquid medium and subjected to delamanid MIC determination (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). We assumed that 0.04 mg/liter indicates a critical MIC (9). We included 129 M. tuberculosis isolates, among them 51 isolates (39.5%) from Peru, 13 (10.1%) from Thailand, 49 (38%) from Côte d’Ivoire, 14 (10.9%) from the DRC, and 1 (0.8%) each from Kenya and South Africa. We identified 70 (54.3%) isolates with polymorphisms in at least one of the six F420 genes compared to the reference genome (Table S1). All patients infected with either of these strains were naive to delamanid. We selected strains fulfilling the following criteria: (i) mutations in a part of the gene encoding regions of catalytic or structural importance predicted by ARIBA and then the PhyResSE pipeline (32, 33), (ii) availability of a culture of the strain, and (iii) bacterial growth amenable to microdilution (25). MICs were determined for 10 isolates with mutations in the F420 genes. Four isolates showed MICs of >0.015 mg/liter: specifically, MICs of 0.5 (patient 1), 0.03 (patients 6 and 10), and >8 (patient 9) mg/liter (Table 1; Fig. S1). The isolate from patient 1 had a polymorphism in fgd1 (Lys270Met) and was susceptible to the six drugs tested (isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, pyrazinamide, moxifloxacin, and amikacin). The patient was cured. The isolate from patient 9 had two alterations: a deletion in ddn (Tyr29del) and a nucleotide change in fgd1 (T960C). The strain showed an elevated delamanid MIC and was phenotypically susceptible to six other drugs tested. The patient died. The MIC for the isolates of patients 10 and 6 was above 0.015 but below 0.04 mg/liter (Table 1). This suggests low-level resistance to delamanid (22), which could be due to the combination of various mutations: Ala416Val (fbiC), Trp678Gly (fbiC), Arg64Ser (fgd1), and T960C (fgd1).
TABLE 1

Observed polymorphisms in F420 genes and MIC values of delamanid

Patient no. or referenceLineageCountryHIV statusAge (yr) at TB diagnosisGenderMutation(s) in the F420 genesTreatment outcomeMIC (mg/liter) in the microdilution
ReferenceH37Rv (ATCC 27294)Control (wt)≤0.015
1L4.1.2.1Côte d’IvoireNegative29Femalefgd1 Lys270MetCured0.5
2L4.6.2.2Côte d’IvoireNegative51Maleddn C168TDied≤0.015
3L2.2.1KenyaPositive40Malefgd1 T960CDied≤0.015
4L2.2.1PeruPositive28Malefgd1 T960CUnknown≤0.015
5L4.3.2PeruNegative21MalefbiC C1161TCured≤0.015
6L4.1.2.1PeruPositive45Malefgd1 Lys270MetUnknown0.03
7L4.1.2.1PeruPositive36MalefbiC G-11A, fgd1 Lys270MetUnknown≤0.015
8L4.1.2South AfricaNegative57FemalefbiA Ile208ValCured≤0.015
9L2.2.1ThailandUnknown76Malefgd1 T960C, ddn 85-87del (Tyr29del)Died>8
10L1.1.1ThailandNegative42MalefbiC Ala416Val Trp678Gly, fgd1 Arg64Ser T960CUnknown0.03

All patients were treated with 2 months of daily isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol, followed by 4 months of daily rifampin and isoniazid. Data for isolates for which the MIC was >0.015 are shown in boldface. wt, wild type; L, lineage.

Observed polymorphisms in F420 genes and MIC values of delamanid All patients were treated with 2 months of daily isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol, followed by 4 months of daily rifampin and isoniazid. Data for isolates for which the MIC was >0.015 are shown in boldface. wt, wild type; L, lineage. In summary, in the subset of 10 isolates with polymorphisms in the six targeted genes, six had no elevated MIC in the microdilution, while four isolates had elevated MICs (Table 1). In line with previous studies, we found that Lys270Met in fgd1 is a natural polymorphism characteristic of M. tuberculosis lineage 4.1.2.1, which may (patients 1 and 6) or may not (patient 7) lead to an increased delamanid MIC (19, 34, 35). All 16 strains of lineage 4.1.2.1 showed this lineage-specific marker (Table S1). Furthermore, T960C (fgd1) is a synonymous substitution and was found in three other patient isolates which, as expected, did not have a critical MIC. The increase in the delamanid MIC for the isolate of patient 9 was due to the deletion in ddn (7). Our results thus suggest that Tyr29del is a natural polymorphism leading to an increased delamanid MIC. Our study was too small to estimate the prevalence of strains that are naturally resistant to delamanid. In 2020, Lee et al. screened 14,876 M. tuberculosis strains and found 2 strains with Tyr29del, for a prevalence of 0.013% (36). However, in their study, only the ddn gene was screened, and the prevalence of natural resistance could, therefore, be higher. In conclusion, we confirm that mutations in F420 genes can confer an elevated delamanid MIC (13, 19). Whether our findings also apply to the related drug pretomanid should be investigated in future studies. The occurrence of clinical M. tuberculosis isolates from previously untreated patients for which delamanid MICs are naturally elevated calls for careful drug susceptibility testing (DST) prior to delamanid treatment (5, 36). However, access to DST is limited in high-burden countries. This dilemma highlights the conflict between making new drugs available in high-burden countries and avoiding the spread of drug-resistant strains.

Data availability.

WGS data from patients’ M. tuberculosis strains shown in Table 1 have been submitted to the NCBI (BioProject accession no. PRJNA300846) (Table S1).
  32 in total

1.  Emergence of Low-level Delamanid and Bedaquiline Resistance During Extremely Drug-resistant Tuberculosis Treatment.

Authors:  Silke Polsfuss; Sabine Hofmann-Thiel; Matthias Merker; David Krieger; Stefan Niemann; Holger Rüssmann; Nicolas Schönfeld; Harald Hoffmann; Katharina Kranzer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  In Vitro Drug Susceptibility of Bedaquiline, Delamanid, Linezolid, Clofazimine, Moxifloxacin, and Gatifloxacin against Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Yu Pang; Zhaojing Zong; Fengmin Huo; Wei Jing; Yifeng Ma; Lingling Dong; Yunxu Li; Liping Zhao; Yuhong Fu; Hairong Huang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  PhyResSE: a Web Tool Delineating Mycobacterium tuberculosis Antibiotic Resistance and Lineage from Whole-Genome Sequencing Data.

Authors:  Silke Feuerriegel; Viola Schleusener; Patrick Beckert; Thomas A Kohl; Paolo Miotto; Daniela M Cirillo; Andrea M Cabibbe; Stefan Niemann; Kurt Fellenberg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Delamanid: From discovery to its use for pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB).

Authors:  Yongge Liu; Makoto Matsumoto; Hidekaza Ishida; Kinue Ohguro; Masuhiro Yoshitake; Rajesh Gupta; Lawrence Geiter; Jeffrey Hafkin
Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.131

5.  MIC of Delamanid (OPC-67683) against Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clinical Isolates and a Proposed Critical Concentration.

Authors:  Kelly Stinson; Natalia Kurepina; Amour Venter; Mamoru Fujiwara; Masanori Kawasaki; Juliano Timm; Elena Shashkina; Barry N Kreiswirth; Yongge Liu; Makoto Matsumoto; Lawrence Geiter
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Conversion of NO2 to NO by reduced coenzyme F420 protects mycobacteria from nitrosative damage.

Authors:  Endang Purwantini; Biswarup Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Genome-wide analysis of multi- and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Francesc Coll; Jody Phelan; Grant A Hill-Cawthorne; Mridul B Nair; Kim Mallard; Shahjahan Ali; Abdallah M Abdallah; Saad Alghamdi; Mona Alsomali; Abdallah O Ahmed; Stephanie Portelli; Yaa Oppong; Adriana Alves; Theolis Barbosa Bessa; Susana Campino; Maxine Caws; Anirvan Chatterjee; Amelia C Crampin; Keertan Dheda; Nicholas Furnham; Judith R Glynn; Louis Grandjean; Dang Minh Ha; Rumina Hasan; Zahra Hasan; Martin L Hibberd; Moses Joloba; Edward C Jones-López; Tomoshige Matsumoto; Anabela Miranda; David J Moore; Nora Mocillo; Stefan Panaiotov; Julian Parkhill; Carlos Penha; João Perdigão; Isabel Portugal; Zineb Rchiad; Jaime Robledo; Patricia Sheen; Nashwa Talaat Shesha; Frik A Sirgel; Christophe Sola; Erivelton Oliveira Sousa; Elizabeth M Streicher; Paul Van Helden; Miguel Viveiros; Robert M Warren; Ruth McNerney; Arnab Pain; Taane G Clark
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  ARIBA: rapid antimicrobial resistance genotyping directly from sequencing reads.

Authors:  Martin Hunt; Alison E Mather; Leonor Sánchez-Busó; Andrew J Page; Julian Parkhill; Jacqueline A Keane; Simon R Harris
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2017-09-04

9.  A revised biosynthetic pathway for the cofactor F420 in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Ghader Bashiri; James Antoney; Ehab N M Jirgis; Mihir V Shah; Blair Ney; Janine Copp; Stephanie M Stuteley; Sreevalsan Sreebhavan; Brian Palmer; Martin Middleditch; Nobuhiko Tokuriki; Chris Greening; Colin Scott; Edward N Baker; Colin J Jackson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Acquired Resistance to Bedaquiline and Delamanid in Therapy for Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Guido V Bloemberg; Peter M Keller; David Stucki; David Stuckia; Andrej Trauner; Sonia Borrell; Tsogyal Latshang; Mireia Coscolla; Thomas Rothe; Rico Hömke; Claudia Ritter; Julia Feldmann; Bettina Schulthess; Sebastien Gagneux; Erik C Böttger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparing treatment strategies to reduce antibiotic resistance in an in vitro epidemiological setting.

Authors:  Daniel C Angst; Burcu Tepekule; Lei Sun; Balázs Bogos; Sebastian Bonhoeffer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Genetic diversity of candidate loci linked to Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance to bedaquiline, delamanid and pretomanid.

Authors:  Paula J Gómez-González; Joao Perdigao; Pedro Gomes; Zully M Puyen; David Santos-Lazaro; Gary Napier; Martin L Hibberd; Miguel Viveiros; Isabel Portugal; Susana Campino; Jody E Phelan; Taane G Clark
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Application of Next Generation Sequencing for Diagnosis and Clinical Management of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: Updates on Recent Developments in the Field.

Authors:  Navisha Dookie; Azraa Khan; Nesri Padayatchi; Kogieleum Naidoo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Delamanid or pretomanid? A Solomonic judgement!

Authors:  Saskia E Mudde; Anna M Upton; Anne Lenaerts; Hannelore I Bax; Jurriaan E M De Steenwinkel
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 5.  Tuberculosis Phenotypic and Genotypic Drug Susceptibility Testing and Immunodiagnostics: A Review.

Authors:  Kizil A Yusoof; Juan Ignacio García; Alyssa Schami; Andreu Garcia-Vilanova; Holden V Kelley; Shu-Hua Wang; Adrian Rendon; Blanca I Restrepo; Marcel Yotebieng; Jordi B Torrelles
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 8.786

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.