Literature DB >> 32868208

Influence of different energy patterns on efficacy of radial shock wave therapy.

Tomonori Kenmoku1, Nahoko Iwakura2, Nobuyasu Ochiai3, Takashi Saisu4, Seiji Ohtori3, Kenji Takahashi5, Toshiyuki Nakazawa6, Michinari Fukuda7, Masashi Takaso6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the mechanisms of the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for impaired muscle coordination of limbs is the destruction of Acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) at neuromuscular junction. The highly increased density of AChRs can change the acoustic impedance, and this change of the acoustic impedance can be the reason that radial shock wave (rESW) destroy AChRs selectively. However, the relationship between applied energy of rESWs and the therapeutic efficacy remains unclear, although some studies compared the clinical efficacy of rESWT between high- and low-energy applications. This study aimed to compare the CMAP change among different energy and pulses of rESW application.
METHODS: Male Sprauger-Dawley rats were used. A device that generates radial shock waves pneumatically, was used to apply the following six patterns of radial extracorporeal shockwaves in different energy flux densities and pulses to the right calf of each rat: 1, 8000 pulses at 0.045 mJ/mm2; 2, 4000 pulses at 0.09 mJ/mm2; 3, 2000 pulses at 0.18 mJ/mm2; 4, 4000 pulses at 0.045 mJ/mm2; 5, 2000 pulses at 0.09 mJ/mm2; 6, 1000 pulses at 0.18 mJ/mm2. Left calf muscles were considered controls.
RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in CMAP amplitude between control and rESW-exposed muscles in the group applied 4000 pulses with EFD at 0.09 mJ/mm2 and the group applied 2000 pulses with EFD at 0.18 mJ/mm2. However, the group applied 8000 pulses with EFD at 0.045 mJ/mm2 and all groups which was exposed to total 180 mJ rESW application did not show a significantly decreased CMAP amplitude compared with the untreated side.
CONCLUSIONS: Total energy and energy flux density correlate with a decrease in CMAP amplitude by rESW application. These findings could be availed by clinicians in actual clinical setting for the proper application of rESW.
Copyright © 2020 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32868208     DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  3 in total

Review 1.  The Effects of the Exposure of Musculoskeletal Tissue to Extracorporeal Shock Waves.

Authors:  Tobias Wuerfel; Christoph Schmitz; Leon L J Jokinen
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-06

2.  Effectiveness of Focused Shockwave Therapy versus Radial Shockwave Therapy for Noncalcific Rotator Cuff Tendinopathies: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Chengxin Li; Zhizhuo Li; Lijun Shi; Peixu Wang; Fuqiang Gao; Wei Sun
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Two methods of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy in a rat model of secondary lymphedema: a pilot study.

Authors:  Hee Kyung Cho; Woo Jung Sung; Youn Ju Lee; Sang Gyu Kwak; Kang Lip Kim
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.671

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.