Literature DB >> 32868158

Development and decay of procedural skills in surgery: A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation-based medical education interventions.

Mark Higgins1, Christopher Madan2, Rakesh Patel3.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Changes to surgical training programmes in the UK has led to a reduction in theatre time for trainees, and an increasing reliance on simulation to provide procedural experience. Whilst simulation offers opportunity for repetitive practice, the effectiveness of simulation as an educational intervention for developing procedural surgical skills is unclear.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was undertaken to retrieve all studies describing simulation-based medical education (SBME) interventions for the development of procedural surgical skills using the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE and PUBMED databases. Studies measuring skill retention or demonstrating transferability of skills for improving patient outcomes were included in the review.
RESULTS: SBME is superior to no training and can lead to improvement in procedural surgical skills, such that skills transfer from simulated environments into theatre. SBME results in minimal skill degradation after 2 weeks, although more significant decay results after >90 days. Many studies recruited <10 participants, used a variety of methods and were restricted to endoscopic surgical techniques. All studies did not compare interventions with non-SBME teaching methods for developing procedural surgical skills. No studies compared the curriculum design of different surgical training programmes.
CONCLUSIONS: SBME interventions are effective for developing procedural skills in surgery. SBME interventions are also effective for preventing the decay of procedural surgical skills. Although no studies demonstrate non-inferiority of SBME interventions compared to time in theatre developing skills, SBME interventions do enable the transfer of skills into theatre, and the potential for improving patient outcomes. Crown
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Simulation; Simulation based medical education (SBME); Skills training; Surgery; Surgical simulation; Surgical training

Year:  2020        PMID: 32868158     DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgeon        ISSN: 1479-666X            Impact factor:   2.392


  3 in total

1.  Which Way Would You Slice It? Evaluation of 3 Educational Models for the Loop Drainage Technique.

Authors:  Lauren S Rosenblatt; Samantha A King; Michele E Callahan; R Gentry Wilkerson
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2022-03-23

2.  Virtual-Augmented Reality and Life-Like Neurosurgical Simulator for Training: First Evaluation of a Hands-On Experience for Residents.

Authors:  Salvatore Petrone; Fabio Cofano; Federico Nicolosi; Giannantonio Spena; Marco Moschino; Giuseppe Di Perna; Andrea Lavorato; Michele Maria Lanotte; Diego Garbossa
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-19

3.  Robotics and AI for Teleoperation, Tele-Assessment, and Tele-Training for Surgery in the Era of COVID-19: Existing Challenges, and Future Vision.

Authors:  Navid Feizi; Mahdi Tavakoli; Rajni V Patel; S Farokh Atashzar
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-04-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.